Unlearning the green revolution: Inventory of agroecological practices in Ceará, Brazil, an instrument for decolonizing territory and (re)valuing peasant knowledge

IF 4.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Peter Michael Rosset , Ivanete Ferreira Fernandes , Lia Pinheiro Barbosa , Cosma dos Santos Damasceno , Weeraboon Wisartsakul
{"title":"Unlearning the green revolution: Inventory of agroecological practices in Ceará, Brazil, an instrument for decolonizing territory and (re)valuing peasant knowledge","authors":"Peter Michael Rosset ,&nbsp;Ivanete Ferreira Fernandes ,&nbsp;Lia Pinheiro Barbosa ,&nbsp;Cosma dos Santos Damasceno ,&nbsp;Weeraboon Wisartsakul","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this article we discuss the use of an inventory or mapping of agroecological practices, part of the \"Peasant to Peasant\" (PtP) methodology that is used to promote the territorialization of peasant agroecology, as a method for the epistemic decolonization of a territory. The so-called Green Revolution involved the imposition of exogenous technologies and knowledge, causing the fragmentation and devaluation of local peasant farming knowledge and practices adapted to local conditions, while locking farmers into external dependence. It was an epistemic colonization. The construction of an emancipatory horizontal process of <em>peasant agroecology</em>, on the other hand, necessarily requires “unlearning” that externally imposed exogenous knowledge. We use the case of the PtP process in the Santana Settlement, an agrarian reform community of the Landless Rural Workers' Movement (MST) in Ceará, Brazil, in order to demonstrate and analyze the inventory as a collective tool for decolonization.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"165 ","pages":"Article 104022"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901125000383","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this article we discuss the use of an inventory or mapping of agroecological practices, part of the "Peasant to Peasant" (PtP) methodology that is used to promote the territorialization of peasant agroecology, as a method for the epistemic decolonization of a territory. The so-called Green Revolution involved the imposition of exogenous technologies and knowledge, causing the fragmentation and devaluation of local peasant farming knowledge and practices adapted to local conditions, while locking farmers into external dependence. It was an epistemic colonization. The construction of an emancipatory horizontal process of peasant agroecology, on the other hand, necessarily requires “unlearning” that externally imposed exogenous knowledge. We use the case of the PtP process in the Santana Settlement, an agrarian reform community of the Landless Rural Workers' Movement (MST) in Ceará, Brazil, in order to demonstrate and analyze the inventory as a collective tool for decolonization.
忘却绿色革命:巴西塞埃尔农业生态实践清单,领土非殖民化和(重新)重视农民知识的工具
在本文中,我们讨论了农业生态实践的清单或地图的使用,这是“农民对农民”(PtP)方法的一部分,用于促进农民农业生态的属地化,作为一种认识上的领土非殖民化方法。所谓的绿色革命涉及外源性技术和知识的强加,导致当地农民适应当地条件的农业知识和实践的碎片化和贬值,同时使农民陷入外部依赖。这是一种认知上的殖民。另一方面,农民生态农业解放的横向过程的建构,必然要求“忘却”外部强加的外生知识。我们以巴西塞埃尔无地农村工人运动(MST)的土地改革社区桑塔纳定居点(Santana Settlement)的PtP过程为例,来证明和分析该清单作为非殖民化的集体工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Science & Policy
Environmental Science & Policy 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
332
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Policy promotes communication among government, business and industry, academia, and non-governmental organisations who are instrumental in the solution of environmental problems. It also seeks to advance interdisciplinary research of policy relevance on environmental issues such as climate change, biodiversity, environmental pollution and wastes, renewable and non-renewable natural resources, sustainability, and the interactions among these issues. The journal emphasises the linkages between these environmental issues and social and economic issues such as production, transport, consumption, growth, demographic changes, well-being, and health. However, the subject coverage will not be restricted to these issues and the introduction of new dimensions will be encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信