Volatility spillover dynamics between fintech and traditional financial industries and their rich determinants: New evidence from Chinese listed institutions

IF 7.5 1区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Chengcheng Liu , Meng Tian , Bai Huang
{"title":"Volatility spillover dynamics between fintech and traditional financial industries and their rich determinants: New evidence from Chinese listed institutions","authors":"Chengcheng Liu ,&nbsp;Meng Tian ,&nbsp;Bai Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates the dynamics and determinants of volatility spillovers between Chinese financial technology (fintech) and traditional financial industries. We use stock prices of listed institutions and the elastic net vector autoregression (VAR) network approach to assess institution-, industry-, and system-level volatility spillovers in normal states between 2015 and 2023. Subsequently, we analyze 50 variables in terms of global environment, economic fundamentals, capital market, industry development, and other shocks and examine their impact on system- and industry-level volatility spillovers through variable selection and regression analysis. Furthermore, heterogeneous and asymmetric effects in extreme states are explored under a quantile-based framework. The empirical results show that (i) at the institutional level, volatility spillovers surge in the post-COVID-19 era, and large-cap institutions play vital roles in emitting volatility shocks. (ii) At the industry level, the fintech, securities, and diversified financial industries are net volatility transmitters, while the banking, insurance, and real estate industries are net receivers. Fundamental economic determinants prevail in explaining the net spillover index. (iii) At the system level, the total spillover index demonstrates a W-shape curve throughout the period. All determinants together explain over 85 % of the total spillover index. (iv) In extremely low and high volatility states, spillover effects are more obvious than in normal states. Industry development and capital market determinants fail to explain the respective total spillover indices. These findings offer valuable insights into how to foster effective risk management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48226,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Financial Analysis","volume":"101 ","pages":"Article 104034"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Financial Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521925001218","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the dynamics and determinants of volatility spillovers between Chinese financial technology (fintech) and traditional financial industries. We use stock prices of listed institutions and the elastic net vector autoregression (VAR) network approach to assess institution-, industry-, and system-level volatility spillovers in normal states between 2015 and 2023. Subsequently, we analyze 50 variables in terms of global environment, economic fundamentals, capital market, industry development, and other shocks and examine their impact on system- and industry-level volatility spillovers through variable selection and regression analysis. Furthermore, heterogeneous and asymmetric effects in extreme states are explored under a quantile-based framework. The empirical results show that (i) at the institutional level, volatility spillovers surge in the post-COVID-19 era, and large-cap institutions play vital roles in emitting volatility shocks. (ii) At the industry level, the fintech, securities, and diversified financial industries are net volatility transmitters, while the banking, insurance, and real estate industries are net receivers. Fundamental economic determinants prevail in explaining the net spillover index. (iii) At the system level, the total spillover index demonstrates a W-shape curve throughout the period. All determinants together explain over 85 % of the total spillover index. (iv) In extremely low and high volatility states, spillover effects are more obvious than in normal states. Industry development and capital market determinants fail to explain the respective total spillover indices. These findings offer valuable insights into how to foster effective risk management.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
9.80%
发文量
366
期刊介绍: The International Review of Financial Analysis (IRFA) is an impartial refereed journal designed to serve as a platform for high-quality financial research. It welcomes a diverse range of financial research topics and maintains an unbiased selection process. While not limited to U.S.-centric subjects, IRFA, as its title suggests, is open to valuable research contributions from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信