Frailty and pre-frailty prevalence in community-dwelling elderly with multimorbidity: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 3.5 3区医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY

Archives of gerontology and geriatrics Pub Date : 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1016/j.archger.2025.105782

Shiying Cai , Jue Li , Yi Fang , Zikai Feng , Huanjiang Liu , Jiaxin Chen , Xiali Yang , Bin Lin , Zhiyuan Tian

{"title":"Frailty and pre-frailty prevalence in community-dwelling elderly with multimorbidity: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Shiying Cai , Jue Li , Yi Fang , Zikai Feng , Huanjiang Liu , Jiaxin Chen , Xiali Yang , Bin Lin , Zhiyuan Tian","doi":"10.1016/j.archger.2025.105782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The relationship between frailty/pre-frailty, and multimorbidity in the elderly is recognized, but specific prevalence among community-dwelling elderly with multimorbidity is unclear. This study aims to determine these rates, analyze subgroup, and identify sources of heterogeneity to bolster evidence-based interventions and health policies.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We searched nine databases from inception to November 16, 2023, for cross-sectional and cohort studies on community-dwelling elderly with multimorbidity. Data were extracted to calculate the prevalence of frailty and pre-frailty. Study quality was assessed using AHRQ and NOS tools.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Fifteen studies encompassing 9,683 participants with multimorbidity were analyzed. The pooled prevalence of frailty and pre-frailty was 18.1 % and 48.9 %, respectively. Age-stratified analyses found 17 % frailty and 58.4 % pre-frailty in the 70–74 age group, and 16.7 % and 54.2 % in those above 75 years. Cross-sectional studies showed 18.8 % frailty and 48.1 % pre-frailty, while cohort studies showed 18.1 % and 50.5 %, respectively. Asia had higher rates (22.7 % frailty, 43.5 % pre-frailty) than the Americas (9.9 % frailty, 56.3 % pre-frailty). By sample size, frailty prevalence was 21.3 % (<500), 9.1 % (500–999), and 17.9 % (≥1000), with pre-frailty at 51.1 %, 45.6 %, and 47.7 %. The FP method yielded higher prevalence estimates (17.7 % frailty, 51.6 % pre-frailty) than the FS method (9.5 % frailty, 39.2 % pre-frailty).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study provides insights into the prevalence of frailty and pre-frailty among community-dwelling elderly with multimorbidity. Variations in prevalence rates may be attributed to differences in sample size and measurement tools, which also contribute to heterogeneity observed across subgroups.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8306,"journal":{"name":"Archives of gerontology and geriatrics","volume":"132 ","pages":"Article 105782"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of gerontology and geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167494325000408","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The relationship between frailty/pre-frailty, and multimorbidity in the elderly is recognized, but specific prevalence among community-dwelling elderly with multimorbidity is unclear. This study aims to determine these rates, analyze subgroup, and identify sources of heterogeneity to bolster evidence-based interventions and health policies.

Methods

We searched nine databases from inception to November 16, 2023, for cross-sectional and cohort studies on community-dwelling elderly with multimorbidity. Data were extracted to calculate the prevalence of frailty and pre-frailty. Study quality was assessed using AHRQ and NOS tools.

Results

Fifteen studies encompassing 9,683 participants with multimorbidity were analyzed. The pooled prevalence of frailty and pre-frailty was 18.1 % and 48.9 %, respectively. Age-stratified analyses found 17 % frailty and 58.4 % pre-frailty in the 70–74 age group, and 16.7 % and 54.2 % in those above 75 years. Cross-sectional studies showed 18.8 % frailty and 48.1 % pre-frailty, while cohort studies showed 18.1 % and 50.5 %, respectively. Asia had higher rates (22.7 % frailty, 43.5 % pre-frailty) than the Americas (9.9 % frailty, 56.3 % pre-frailty). By sample size, frailty prevalence was 21.3 % (<500), 9.1 % (500–999), and 17.9 % (≥1000), with pre-frailty at 51.1 %, 45.6 %, and 47.7 %. The FP method yielded higher prevalence estimates (17.7 % frailty, 51.6 % pre-frailty) than the FS method (9.5 % frailty, 39.2 % pre-frailty).

Conclusion

This study provides insights into the prevalence of frailty and pre-frailty among community-dwelling elderly with multimorbidity. Variations in prevalence rates may be attributed to differences in sample size and measurement tools, which also contribute to heterogeneity observed across subgroups.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Archives of gerontology and geriatrics 医学-老年医学

CiteScore

7.30

自引率

5.00%

发文量

198

审稿时长

16 days

期刊介绍： Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics provides a medium for the publication of papers from the fields of experimental gerontology and clinical and social geriatrics. The principal aim of the journal is to facilitate the exchange of information between specialists in these three fields of gerontological research. Experimental papers dealing with the basic mechanisms of aging at molecular, cellular, tissue or organ levels will be published. Clinical papers will be accepted if they provide sufficiently new information or are of fundamental importance for the knowledge of human aging. Purely descriptive clinical papers will be accepted only if the results permit further interpretation. Papers dealing with anti-aging pharmacological preparations in humans are welcome. Papers on the social aspects of geriatrics will be accepted if they are of general interest regarding the epidemiology of aging and the efficiency and working methods of the social organizations for the health care of the elderly.