Oseweuba Valentine Okoro , D.E. Caevel Hippolyte , Lei Nie , Keikhosro Karimi , Joeri F.M. Denayer , Armin Shavandi
{"title":"Machine learning-based predictive modeling and optimization: Artificial neural network-genetic algorithm vs. response surface methodology for black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) farm waste fermentation","authors":"Oseweuba Valentine Okoro , D.E. Caevel Hippolyte , Lei Nie , Keikhosro Karimi , Joeri F.M. Denayer , Armin Shavandi","doi":"10.1016/j.bej.2025.109685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Recognizing the complexity of non-linear and interdependent biological processes, this study compared the predictive performance of artificial neural network (ANN) models with response surface methodology regression based (RB) models. The research focused on the biological transformation of black soldier fly (<em>Hermetia illucens</em>) farm waste into chitin, facilitated by <em>Lactobacillus paracasei</em>. Key parameters of time (1–7 days), temperature (30–40 °C), substrate concentration (7.5–20 wt%), and inoculum concentration (5–15 v/v%), were evaluated for their impact on demineralization and deproteinization subprocesses and subsequently optimized. It was determined that the ANN models outperformed RB models, with R² values of 0.950 and 0.959 for DP% and DD%, compared to 0.677 and 0.720 for RB models. While both models, optimized using a multi-objective genetic algorithm (MOGA) and a desirability function respectively, produced comparable optimal results, differences emerged in process variable analysis. Main effects plots (RB) and one way partial dependence plots (ANN) revealed conflicting parameter influences, highlighting the limitations of regression models in complex systems. This study highlights the superiority of ANN-MOGA in addressing biological complexity and recommends its use especially if RB models show suboptimal predictive capabilities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8766,"journal":{"name":"Biochemical Engineering Journal","volume":"218 ","pages":"Article 109685"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biochemical Engineering Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369703X25000580","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Recognizing the complexity of non-linear and interdependent biological processes, this study compared the predictive performance of artificial neural network (ANN) models with response surface methodology regression based (RB) models. The research focused on the biological transformation of black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) farm waste into chitin, facilitated by Lactobacillus paracasei. Key parameters of time (1–7 days), temperature (30–40 °C), substrate concentration (7.5–20 wt%), and inoculum concentration (5–15 v/v%), were evaluated for their impact on demineralization and deproteinization subprocesses and subsequently optimized. It was determined that the ANN models outperformed RB models, with R² values of 0.950 and 0.959 for DP% and DD%, compared to 0.677 and 0.720 for RB models. While both models, optimized using a multi-objective genetic algorithm (MOGA) and a desirability function respectively, produced comparable optimal results, differences emerged in process variable analysis. Main effects plots (RB) and one way partial dependence plots (ANN) revealed conflicting parameter influences, highlighting the limitations of regression models in complex systems. This study highlights the superiority of ANN-MOGA in addressing biological complexity and recommends its use especially if RB models show suboptimal predictive capabilities.
期刊介绍:
The Biochemical Engineering Journal aims to promote progress in the crucial chemical engineering aspects of the development of biological processes associated with everything from raw materials preparation to product recovery relevant to industries as diverse as medical/healthcare, industrial biotechnology, and environmental biotechnology.
The Journal welcomes full length original research papers, short communications, and review papers* in the following research fields:
Biocatalysis (enzyme or microbial) and biotransformations, including immobilized biocatalyst preparation and kinetics
Biosensors and Biodevices including biofabrication and novel fuel cell development
Bioseparations including scale-up and protein refolding/renaturation
Environmental Bioengineering including bioconversion, bioremediation, and microbial fuel cells
Bioreactor Systems including characterization, optimization and scale-up
Bioresources and Biorefinery Engineering including biomass conversion, biofuels, bioenergy, and optimization
Industrial Biotechnology including specialty chemicals, platform chemicals and neutraceuticals
Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering including bioartificial organs, cell encapsulation, and controlled release
Cell Culture Engineering (plant, animal or insect cells) including viral vectors, monoclonal antibodies, recombinant proteins, vaccines, and secondary metabolites
Cell Therapies and Stem Cells including pluripotent, mesenchymal and hematopoietic stem cells; immunotherapies; tissue-specific differentiation; and cryopreservation
Metabolic Engineering, Systems and Synthetic Biology including OMICS, bioinformatics, in silico biology, and metabolic flux analysis
Protein Engineering including enzyme engineering and directed evolution.