Assessing the impacts and driving factors of land regulation on urban and rural environmental pollution

IF 9.8 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Yating Yang , Youwen Zhang , Ruifang Luo , Xiaoyuan Chen , Ruilian Zhang
{"title":"Assessing the impacts and driving factors of land regulation on urban and rural environmental pollution","authors":"Yating Yang ,&nbsp;Youwen Zhang ,&nbsp;Ruifang Luo ,&nbsp;Xiaoyuan Chen ,&nbsp;Ruilian Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2025.107885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Land regulation plays a crucial role in shaping environmental outcomes in both urban and rural areas along with global climate change. This study examines the impacts of land regulation on environmental pollution and identifies key driving factors influencing this relationship. Using a comprehensive dataset and empirical analysis, we assess how land regulations affect environmental pollution levels across diverse regions. The findings reveal that although both urban and rural areas are making progress in reducing environmental pollution, rural areas remain more polluted than urban ones. Compared to 2007, the difference between rural and urban environmental pollution increased by 7.24 % in 2022. Urban and rural environmental pollution have exhibited opposing trends in their evolution. While urban environmental pollution has increased, rural environmental pollution has shown a declining trajectory. In 2010, the gap was the smallest, almost negligible (0.11). In 2021, the difference between rural and urban pollution levels reached its peak (9.78), meaning the gap between the two was at its widest. The research shows that in urban region, factors like land regulation (−0.252), economic development (−0.438), industrialization (−1.734), marketization (−0.700), and environmental regulation (−0.428) are linked to lower pollution levels. On the other hand, urbanization (0.029) and global integration level (0.294) are the key factors that contribute to higher pollution level. While in rural region, economic growth (−0.686) helps reduce rural pollution, but factors like industrialization (1.387), urbanization (0.029), and increased market (2.075) or global integration (0.131) contribute to worsening pollution in rural areas. In the eastern and western region, the land regulation leads to a reduction in urban environmental pollution but results in an increase in rural environmental pollution. In the central region, the land regulation has no impact on urban environmental pollution but leads to an increase in rural environmental pollution. The research aims to make contribution by distinguishing the impacts of land regulation in urban and rural environmental settings and offering region-specific policy recommendations to balance development and environmental sustainability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"113 ","pages":"Article 107885"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925525000824","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Land regulation plays a crucial role in shaping environmental outcomes in both urban and rural areas along with global climate change. This study examines the impacts of land regulation on environmental pollution and identifies key driving factors influencing this relationship. Using a comprehensive dataset and empirical analysis, we assess how land regulations affect environmental pollution levels across diverse regions. The findings reveal that although both urban and rural areas are making progress in reducing environmental pollution, rural areas remain more polluted than urban ones. Compared to 2007, the difference between rural and urban environmental pollution increased by 7.24 % in 2022. Urban and rural environmental pollution have exhibited opposing trends in their evolution. While urban environmental pollution has increased, rural environmental pollution has shown a declining trajectory. In 2010, the gap was the smallest, almost negligible (0.11). In 2021, the difference between rural and urban pollution levels reached its peak (9.78), meaning the gap between the two was at its widest. The research shows that in urban region, factors like land regulation (−0.252), economic development (−0.438), industrialization (−1.734), marketization (−0.700), and environmental regulation (−0.428) are linked to lower pollution levels. On the other hand, urbanization (0.029) and global integration level (0.294) are the key factors that contribute to higher pollution level. While in rural region, economic growth (−0.686) helps reduce rural pollution, but factors like industrialization (1.387), urbanization (0.029), and increased market (2.075) or global integration (0.131) contribute to worsening pollution in rural areas. In the eastern and western region, the land regulation leads to a reduction in urban environmental pollution but results in an increase in rural environmental pollution. In the central region, the land regulation has no impact on urban environmental pollution but leads to an increase in rural environmental pollution. The research aims to make contribution by distinguishing the impacts of land regulation in urban and rural environmental settings and offering region-specific policy recommendations to balance development and environmental sustainability.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
10.10%
发文量
200
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信