Personality and coping: A systematic review of recent literature

IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Christopher Guadalupe , Hilary L. DeShong
{"title":"Personality and coping: A systematic review of recent literature","authors":"Christopher Guadalupe ,&nbsp;Hilary L. DeShong","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2025.113119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This systematic review examines the relationship between personality traits and coping strategies, with an emphasis on addressing theoretical and methodological challenges highlighted in Carver's (2010) foundational work. Drawing on 75 studies published between 2010 and 2024, the review reveals consistent findings linking the Five-Factor Model (FFM) traits to specific coping domains: conscientiousness, extraversion, and openness are associated with problem-focused coping, while neuroticism is strongly linked to avoidant coping. Variability in the associations with emotion-focused coping underscores definitional and measurement inconsistencies in the coping literature. The review identifies two primary issues: a lack of a unified coping theory and inconsistent use of validated measures, with 21 distinct coping tools observed. Additionally, most studies employed cross-sectional designs, limiting conclusions about more complex relationships between personality and coping. This review highlights the need for greater cohesion and methodological rigor to advance understanding and application of personality-coping research. Recommendations include the adoption of FFM facets for greater precision, the use and measurement of personality traits outside of just the FFM, adherence to validated coping frameworks, and the use of longitudinal and experimental methods to explore causal pathways and cyclical relationships.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"239 ","pages":"Article 113119"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886925000819","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This systematic review examines the relationship between personality traits and coping strategies, with an emphasis on addressing theoretical and methodological challenges highlighted in Carver's (2010) foundational work. Drawing on 75 studies published between 2010 and 2024, the review reveals consistent findings linking the Five-Factor Model (FFM) traits to specific coping domains: conscientiousness, extraversion, and openness are associated with problem-focused coping, while neuroticism is strongly linked to avoidant coping. Variability in the associations with emotion-focused coping underscores definitional and measurement inconsistencies in the coping literature. The review identifies two primary issues: a lack of a unified coping theory and inconsistent use of validated measures, with 21 distinct coping tools observed. Additionally, most studies employed cross-sectional designs, limiting conclusions about more complex relationships between personality and coping. This review highlights the need for greater cohesion and methodological rigor to advance understanding and application of personality-coping research. Recommendations include the adoption of FFM facets for greater precision, the use and measurement of personality traits outside of just the FFM, adherence to validated coping frameworks, and the use of longitudinal and experimental methods to explore causal pathways and cyclical relationships.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.70%
发文量
577
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Personality and Individual Differences is devoted to the publication of articles (experimental, theoretical, review) which aim to integrate as far as possible the major factors of personality with empirical paradigms from experimental, physiological, animal, clinical, educational, criminological or industrial psychology or to seek an explanation for the causes and major determinants of individual differences in concepts derived from these disciplines. The editors are concerned with both genetic and environmental causes, and they are particularly interested in possible interaction effects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信