Comparative analysis of groundwater potential assessment in Dharmapuri District, Tamil Nadu, India

IF 5.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 WATER RESOURCES
Prabu Babu, Saurabh Chandra Maury
{"title":"Comparative analysis of groundwater potential assessment in Dharmapuri District, Tamil Nadu, India","authors":"Prabu Babu,&nbsp;Saurabh Chandra Maury","doi":"10.1007/s13201-025-02402-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Population growth has significantly affected groundwater resources globally. Groundwater is essential for agriculture and human consumption. Considering these issues, we focused on the Dharmapuri District, Tamil Nadu, India. In the study area, 70 <span>\\(\\%\\)</span> of the population depend on agriculture, necessitating assessing groundwater potential zone. Thematic layers such as geology, geomorphology, drainage density, lineament density, slope, soil, land use and land cover, recharge, distance from river, elevation, topographic wetness index and normalized difference vegetation index have been created using ArcGIS. The study aims to assess groundwater potential zones (GWPZ) using enhanced trapezoidal fuzzy number in analytical hierarchy process (ETFAHP) and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) methods with help of ArcGIS. Thematic layer(parameters) weights are calculated using AHP and ETFAHP methods. Notably, previous studies have not used trapezoidal fuzzy numbers in GWPZ. A trapezoidal fuzzy number in AHP method is used to assess GWPZ. The groundwater potential zone is classified as very poor, poor, moderate, fair and very good. The AHP and ETFAHP on groundwater potential index (GWPI) are validated with depth to water level. In this study, AHP on GWPZ showed very poor (15.00%), poor (27.85%), moderate (26.54%), fair (19.80%) and very good (10.81%). Similarly, ETFAHP on GWPZ showed very poor (17.63%), poor (27.58%), moderate (22.77%), fair (21.48%) and very good (10.54%). The area under the curve (AUC) values for AHP and ETFAHP on groundwater potential zones are 0.88 and 0.91, respectively. The AUC value of 0.91 indicates best prediction accuracy in the study area.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8374,"journal":{"name":"Applied Water Science","volume":"15 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13201-025-02402-8.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Water Science","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13201-025-02402-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Population growth has significantly affected groundwater resources globally. Groundwater is essential for agriculture and human consumption. Considering these issues, we focused on the Dharmapuri District, Tamil Nadu, India. In the study area, 70 \(\%\) of the population depend on agriculture, necessitating assessing groundwater potential zone. Thematic layers such as geology, geomorphology, drainage density, lineament density, slope, soil, land use and land cover, recharge, distance from river, elevation, topographic wetness index and normalized difference vegetation index have been created using ArcGIS. The study aims to assess groundwater potential zones (GWPZ) using enhanced trapezoidal fuzzy number in analytical hierarchy process (ETFAHP) and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) methods with help of ArcGIS. Thematic layer(parameters) weights are calculated using AHP and ETFAHP methods. Notably, previous studies have not used trapezoidal fuzzy numbers in GWPZ. A trapezoidal fuzzy number in AHP method is used to assess GWPZ. The groundwater potential zone is classified as very poor, poor, moderate, fair and very good. The AHP and ETFAHP on groundwater potential index (GWPI) are validated with depth to water level. In this study, AHP on GWPZ showed very poor (15.00%), poor (27.85%), moderate (26.54%), fair (19.80%) and very good (10.81%). Similarly, ETFAHP on GWPZ showed very poor (17.63%), poor (27.58%), moderate (22.77%), fair (21.48%) and very good (10.54%). The area under the curve (AUC) values for AHP and ETFAHP on groundwater potential zones are 0.88 and 0.91, respectively. The AUC value of 0.91 indicates best prediction accuracy in the study area.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Water Science
Applied Water Science WATER RESOURCES-
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
3.60%
发文量
268
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信