Is 9 months the sweet spot for male athletes to return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction?

IF 11.6 1区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Roula Kotsifaki, Enda King, Roald Bahr, Rod Whiteley
{"title":"Is 9 months the sweet spot for male athletes to return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction?","authors":"Roula Kotsifaki, Enda King, Roald Bahr, Rod Whiteley","doi":"10.1136/bjsports-2024-108733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective Most studies examining the time to return to sport (RTS) after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) do not account for the athlete’s physical readiness. This study aimed to investigate the status of male athletes at 2 years after ACLR, the factors affecting a return to pivoting sports, and the association between time to RTS and subsequent knee injury risk for those athletes who met discharge criteria. Methods We prospectively followed 530 male athletes (mean age 26.7±7.7 years) participating in pivoting sports throughout rehabilitation and at 2 years after ACLR. Pair-wise analyses were conducted to compare athletes who returned to pivoting sports and those who did not. We performed a Cox regression analysis to assess the association between subsequent non-contact or indirect contact knee injuries and time to RTS. Pearson’s χ2 test was used to compare athletes who RTS in ≤9 months to those who RTS in >9 months after ACLR. Results In total, 379 (72%) athletes returned to pivoting sports at 2 years after ACLR. Athletes who completed rehabilitation and met discharge criteria (n=190) were almost 6 times more likely to return to their preinjury sport (OR 5.71; 95% CI 3.39 to 9.62). Of those who did not complete their rehabilitation (n=340), 132 (39%) did not return to pivoting sports. For athletes who met discharge criteria, time to RTS was not associated with the risk of new knee or ACL injury. There was no increased risk for new knee (HR 0.892, 95% CI 0.39 to 2.07, p=0.79) or ACL (HR 0.718, 95% CI 0.24 to 2.17, p=0.56) injury whether athletes returned before or after the 9-month mark following ACLR. Conclusions Completing rehabilitation and meeting objective criteria significantly increased the odds for male athletes to return to pivoting sports. Time to RTS did not impact the risk for a new knee or ACL injury if athletes met objective criteria. Data are available on reasonable request.","PeriodicalId":9276,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"116 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2024-108733","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective Most studies examining the time to return to sport (RTS) after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) do not account for the athlete’s physical readiness. This study aimed to investigate the status of male athletes at 2 years after ACLR, the factors affecting a return to pivoting sports, and the association between time to RTS and subsequent knee injury risk for those athletes who met discharge criteria. Methods We prospectively followed 530 male athletes (mean age 26.7±7.7 years) participating in pivoting sports throughout rehabilitation and at 2 years after ACLR. Pair-wise analyses were conducted to compare athletes who returned to pivoting sports and those who did not. We performed a Cox regression analysis to assess the association between subsequent non-contact or indirect contact knee injuries and time to RTS. Pearson’s χ2 test was used to compare athletes who RTS in ≤9 months to those who RTS in >9 months after ACLR. Results In total, 379 (72%) athletes returned to pivoting sports at 2 years after ACLR. Athletes who completed rehabilitation and met discharge criteria (n=190) were almost 6 times more likely to return to their preinjury sport (OR 5.71; 95% CI 3.39 to 9.62). Of those who did not complete their rehabilitation (n=340), 132 (39%) did not return to pivoting sports. For athletes who met discharge criteria, time to RTS was not associated with the risk of new knee or ACL injury. There was no increased risk for new knee (HR 0.892, 95% CI 0.39 to 2.07, p=0.79) or ACL (HR 0.718, 95% CI 0.24 to 2.17, p=0.56) injury whether athletes returned before or after the 9-month mark following ACLR. Conclusions Completing rehabilitation and meeting objective criteria significantly increased the odds for male athletes to return to pivoting sports. Time to RTS did not impact the risk for a new knee or ACL injury if athletes met objective criteria. Data are available on reasonable request.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
27.10
自引率
4.90%
发文量
217
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Sports Medicine (BJSM) is a dynamic platform that presents groundbreaking research, thought-provoking reviews, and meaningful discussions on sport and exercise medicine. Our focus encompasses various clinically-relevant aspects such as physiotherapy, physical therapy, and rehabilitation. With an aim to foster innovation, education, and knowledge translation, we strive to bridge the gap between research and practical implementation in the field. Our multi-media approach, including web, print, video, and audio resources, along with our active presence on social media, connects a global community of healthcare professionals dedicated to treating active individuals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信