Lung ultrasound in neonates and children with cardiac diseases with focus on post cardiac surgical period: time for systematic use-an expert opinion report by the Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology Imaging Working Group.
Massimiliano Cantinotti, Giovanni Di Salvo, Inga Voges, Francesca Raimondi, Gerald Greil, Almudena Ortiz Garrido, Heynric B Grotenhuis, Colin J McMahon
{"title":"Lung ultrasound in neonates and children with cardiac diseases with focus on post cardiac surgical period: time for systematic use-an expert opinion report by the Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology Imaging Working Group.","authors":"Massimiliano Cantinotti, Giovanni Di Salvo, Inga Voges, Francesca Raimondi, Gerald Greil, Almudena Ortiz Garrido, Heynric B Grotenhuis, Colin J McMahon","doi":"10.1093/ehjimp/qyae134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite lung ultrasound (LUS) gaining consensus for the diagnosis of pulmonary complication in paediatric acute care setting and in adult cardiology, its use in paediatric cardiology remains limited.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of the present investigation is to provide an expert opinion on the applications of LUS in neonates and children with congenital heart disease, with a special focus on the post-surgical period.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>A complete guide for identification of landmarks and major signs (A and B lines) and their characteristics is provided. Diagnostic criteria, tips, and tricks for the diagnosis, and differential diagnosis of common pulmonary diseases such as pleural effusion, pneumonia, and consolidation are provided. To perform diagnosis of pneumothorax is illustrated. Applications of LUS for evaluation of hemidiaphragm motility and for a comprehensive assessment of retrosternal area are also discussed. The use of LUS for guidance of minor, common interventional procedures such as lung recruitment and drainage insertion is also described. The report also highlights current gaps of knowledge, including the difficulty for quantitative estimation of pleural effusion and atelectasis, and future prospective.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is sufficient evidence to support a systematic use of LUS for the diagnosis and follow-up of neonates and children with cardiac disease especially those undergoing paediatric cardiac surgery. LUS is an easy, accurate, fast, cheap, and radiation-free tool that should become a routine in daily practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":94317,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice","volume":"3 1","pages":"qyae134"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11852288/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjimp/qyae134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Despite lung ultrasound (LUS) gaining consensus for the diagnosis of pulmonary complication in paediatric acute care setting and in adult cardiology, its use in paediatric cardiology remains limited.
Aim: The aim of the present investigation is to provide an expert opinion on the applications of LUS in neonates and children with congenital heart disease, with a special focus on the post-surgical period.
Methods and results: A complete guide for identification of landmarks and major signs (A and B lines) and their characteristics is provided. Diagnostic criteria, tips, and tricks for the diagnosis, and differential diagnosis of common pulmonary diseases such as pleural effusion, pneumonia, and consolidation are provided. To perform diagnosis of pneumothorax is illustrated. Applications of LUS for evaluation of hemidiaphragm motility and for a comprehensive assessment of retrosternal area are also discussed. The use of LUS for guidance of minor, common interventional procedures such as lung recruitment and drainage insertion is also described. The report also highlights current gaps of knowledge, including the difficulty for quantitative estimation of pleural effusion and atelectasis, and future prospective.
Conclusion: There is sufficient evidence to support a systematic use of LUS for the diagnosis and follow-up of neonates and children with cardiac disease especially those undergoing paediatric cardiac surgery. LUS is an easy, accurate, fast, cheap, and radiation-free tool that should become a routine in daily practice.