Patterns of Epidural Patch Distribution: The Influence of Spinal Level, Injection Technique, and Patch Volume/Composition on Craniocaudal and Ventral Epidural Dispersion.

Daniel Montes, Samantha L Pisani Petrucci, Debayan Bhaumik, Nadya Andonov, Peter Lennarson, Andrew L Callen
{"title":"Patterns of Epidural Patch Distribution: The Influence of Spinal Level, Injection Technique, and Patch Volume/Composition on Craniocaudal and Ventral Epidural Dispersion.","authors":"Daniel Montes, Samantha L Pisani Petrucci, Debayan Bhaumik, Nadya Andonov, Peter Lennarson, Andrew L Callen","doi":"10.3174/ajnr.A8720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Epidural patching with autologous blood and/or fibrin sealant is a common treatment for spinal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks, yet the factors influencing patch distribution remain poorly understood. This study aimed to analyze the craniocaudal (CC) and ventral epidural (VE) extent of epidural patch material and investigate the impact of variables such as patch volume, composition, spinal level of injection, and patient habitus on distribution patterns.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective, cross-sectional cohort study included patients who underwent CT-guided epidural patching from January to September 2024. Inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years, dorsal interlaminar (DI) or transforaminal (TFO) epidural patching using blood, fibrin, or both, and immediate post-patch imaging capturing the entire patch extent. Patch distribution was assessed for CC and VE spread. Statistical analyses included linear and logistic regression models, with multivariate analyses adjusting for confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 152 patients patched during the study period, 33 met inclusion criteria (mean age 45.4 years; 84.1% female) with 44 spinal levels patched: cervical (6.8%), thoracic (68.2%), and lumbar (25%). Mean patch volume (PV) per needle was 7.2 mL, with a mean CC spread of 4.6 spinal levels. There was a positive relationship between PV and CC spread across all spinal levels (β = 0.29, p = 0.001). Patches in the cervical region demonstrated the highest CC spread efficiency (0.77 levels/mL) compared to thoracic (0.56 levels/mL) and lumbar patches (0.47 levels/mL; p < 0.01). DI injections achieved greater CC spread but less VE dispersion than TFO injections (5.0 vs. 3.2 levels; p = 0.02; 58.8% vs 70.0%, p = 0.52). VE spread occurred in 61.4% of cases and followed a non-linear pattern along the spine, with an inflection point at T3.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The distribution of epidural patch material is influenced by spinal level, PV, composition, and injection approach. Cervical patches provide the greatest spread efficiency relative to volume, while DI approaches enhance craniocaudal spread but reduce ventral dispersion.</p><p><strong>Abbreviations: </strong>CSF = cerebrospinal fluid; CC = craniocaudal; VE = ventral epidural; DI = dorsal interlaminar; TFO = transforaminal.</p>","PeriodicalId":93863,"journal":{"name":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8720","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Epidural patching with autologous blood and/or fibrin sealant is a common treatment for spinal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks, yet the factors influencing patch distribution remain poorly understood. This study aimed to analyze the craniocaudal (CC) and ventral epidural (VE) extent of epidural patch material and investigate the impact of variables such as patch volume, composition, spinal level of injection, and patient habitus on distribution patterns.

Materials and methods: This retrospective, cross-sectional cohort study included patients who underwent CT-guided epidural patching from January to September 2024. Inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years, dorsal interlaminar (DI) or transforaminal (TFO) epidural patching using blood, fibrin, or both, and immediate post-patch imaging capturing the entire patch extent. Patch distribution was assessed for CC and VE spread. Statistical analyses included linear and logistic regression models, with multivariate analyses adjusting for confounders.

Results: Of 152 patients patched during the study period, 33 met inclusion criteria (mean age 45.4 years; 84.1% female) with 44 spinal levels patched: cervical (6.8%), thoracic (68.2%), and lumbar (25%). Mean patch volume (PV) per needle was 7.2 mL, with a mean CC spread of 4.6 spinal levels. There was a positive relationship between PV and CC spread across all spinal levels (β = 0.29, p = 0.001). Patches in the cervical region demonstrated the highest CC spread efficiency (0.77 levels/mL) compared to thoracic (0.56 levels/mL) and lumbar patches (0.47 levels/mL; p < 0.01). DI injections achieved greater CC spread but less VE dispersion than TFO injections (5.0 vs. 3.2 levels; p = 0.02; 58.8% vs 70.0%, p = 0.52). VE spread occurred in 61.4% of cases and followed a non-linear pattern along the spine, with an inflection point at T3.

Conclusions: The distribution of epidural patch material is influenced by spinal level, PV, composition, and injection approach. Cervical patches provide the greatest spread efficiency relative to volume, while DI approaches enhance craniocaudal spread but reduce ventral dispersion.

Abbreviations: CSF = cerebrospinal fluid; CC = craniocaudal; VE = ventral epidural; DI = dorsal interlaminar; TFO = transforaminal.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信