How I Investigate Measurable Residual Disease in B-Cell Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia After Therapy With Bi-Specific Monoclonal Antibodies and 19CAR-T Cells.
Maura Rosane Valerio Ikoma-Colturato, Felipe Magalhães Furtado, Elen de Oliveira, Fabiola Gevert, Roberia Mendonça
{"title":"How I Investigate Measurable Residual Disease in B-Cell Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia After Therapy With Bi-Specific Monoclonal Antibodies and 19CAR-T Cells.","authors":"Maura Rosane Valerio Ikoma-Colturato, Felipe Magalhães Furtado, Elen de Oliveira, Fabiola Gevert, Roberia Mendonça","doi":"10.1111/ijlh.14448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Measurable residual disease (MRD) in B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL) following anti-CD19 targeted therapies requires specific strategies to identify residual blast cells due to loss or reduced CD19 expression that makes it inconsistent as a primitive marker for B-cell gating.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Due to the increased access of BCP-ALL patients to therapies with CD3/CD19 bispecific T-cell engagers (BiTe) and CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor T-Cell (CAR-T), it is essential that flow cytometry laboratories are prepared to evaluate therapeutic responses.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Here, validated strategies for MRD detection in the context of anti-CD19 therapies are described, accessible to flow cytometry laboratories according to their different facilities. The paper includes an 8-color flow cytometry (FC) strategy for BCP-ALL MRD based on alternative gating without the use of additional markers (Euroflow protocol), as well as other strategies using alternative markers to CD19, comprising 2 protocols using 8 colors, one using 10 colors and another 14 colors/15 markers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Different strategies are needed to detect MRD without using CD19 for B-cell population gating after CD19-targeted therapies. However, it is essential that validated protocols are used according to the available resources to ensure reliable results for clinical decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":94050,"journal":{"name":"International journal of laboratory hematology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of laboratory hematology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ijlh.14448","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Measurable residual disease (MRD) in B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL) following anti-CD19 targeted therapies requires specific strategies to identify residual blast cells due to loss or reduced CD19 expression that makes it inconsistent as a primitive marker for B-cell gating.
Objective: Due to the increased access of BCP-ALL patients to therapies with CD3/CD19 bispecific T-cell engagers (BiTe) and CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor T-Cell (CAR-T), it is essential that flow cytometry laboratories are prepared to evaluate therapeutic responses.
Material and methods: Here, validated strategies for MRD detection in the context of anti-CD19 therapies are described, accessible to flow cytometry laboratories according to their different facilities. The paper includes an 8-color flow cytometry (FC) strategy for BCP-ALL MRD based on alternative gating without the use of additional markers (Euroflow protocol), as well as other strategies using alternative markers to CD19, comprising 2 protocols using 8 colors, one using 10 colors and another 14 colors/15 markers.
Conclusion: Different strategies are needed to detect MRD without using CD19 for B-cell population gating after CD19-targeted therapies. However, it is essential that validated protocols are used according to the available resources to ensure reliable results for clinical decision-making.