The Effect of Non-Invasive, Non-Pharmacological Interventions on Autonomic Regulation of Cardiovascular Function in Adults with Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

IF 1.8 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurotrauma reports Pub Date : 2025-01-13 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1089/neur.2024.0110
Jacob Schoffl, Ashley Craig, Candice McBain, Ilaria Pozzato, James W Middleton, Mohit Arora
{"title":"The Effect of Non-Invasive, Non-Pharmacological Interventions on Autonomic Regulation of Cardiovascular Function in Adults with Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Jacob Schoffl, Ashley Craig, Candice McBain, Ilaria Pozzato, James W Middleton, Mohit Arora","doi":"10.1089/neur.2024.0110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Autonomic regulation of cardiovascular function is often disrupted following a spinal cord injury (SCI). A systematic review was undertaken to evaluate the effect of non-invasive, non-pharmacological (NINP) interventions on cardiovascular autonomic biomarkers in adults with SCI. AMED, CENTRAL, CINAHL EMBASE, and MEDLINE were searched from inception to May 17, 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of NINP interventions for cardiovascular autonomic biomarkers (heart rate variability [HRV], systolic blood pressure variability [SBPV], or baroreflex gain) in adults (≥18 years of age) with SCI (>3 months) were included. Primary outcomes included HRV (low-frequency power [HRV-LF], high-frequency power [HRV-HF], root mean square of successive differences [RMSSD]), SBPV (low-frequency power [SBPV-LF]), and baroreflex sensitivity. The quality and certainty of the evidence were assessed using version 2 of the Cochrane risk of bias tool and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis tool, respectively. Of 2651 records identified, six RCTs were included (participants, <i>n</i> = 123). HRV-LF (four studies; participants, <i>n</i> = 69) and HRV-HF (five studies; participants, <i>n</i> = 93) showed no to small changes in favor of NINP interventions ([g = 0.25; 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.23, 0.73; <i>p</i> = 0.31; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%], [g = 0.00; 95% CI = -0.41, 0.42; <i>p</i> = 0.98; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%], respectively). Limited evidence was available for RMSSD, SBPV-LF, and baroreflex gain. This review found that the evidence is inconclusive regarding the effect of NINP interventions on the included HRV, BPV, and BRS parameters in adults with SCI. Further research with strong methodological rigor is needed to provide greater insights in this area.</p>","PeriodicalId":74300,"journal":{"name":"Neurotrauma reports","volume":"5 1","pages":"1151-1172"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11848056/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurotrauma reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/neur.2024.0110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Autonomic regulation of cardiovascular function is often disrupted following a spinal cord injury (SCI). A systematic review was undertaken to evaluate the effect of non-invasive, non-pharmacological (NINP) interventions on cardiovascular autonomic biomarkers in adults with SCI. AMED, CENTRAL, CINAHL EMBASE, and MEDLINE were searched from inception to May 17, 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of NINP interventions for cardiovascular autonomic biomarkers (heart rate variability [HRV], systolic blood pressure variability [SBPV], or baroreflex gain) in adults (≥18 years of age) with SCI (>3 months) were included. Primary outcomes included HRV (low-frequency power [HRV-LF], high-frequency power [HRV-HF], root mean square of successive differences [RMSSD]), SBPV (low-frequency power [SBPV-LF]), and baroreflex sensitivity. The quality and certainty of the evidence were assessed using version 2 of the Cochrane risk of bias tool and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis tool, respectively. Of 2651 records identified, six RCTs were included (participants, n = 123). HRV-LF (four studies; participants, n = 69) and HRV-HF (five studies; participants, n = 93) showed no to small changes in favor of NINP interventions ([g = 0.25; 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.23, 0.73; p = 0.31; I2 = 0%], [g = 0.00; 95% CI = -0.41, 0.42; p = 0.98; I2 = 0%], respectively). Limited evidence was available for RMSSD, SBPV-LF, and baroreflex gain. This review found that the evidence is inconclusive regarding the effect of NINP interventions on the included HRV, BPV, and BRS parameters in adults with SCI. Further research with strong methodological rigor is needed to provide greater insights in this area.

非侵入性、非药物干预对成人脊髓损伤患者心血管功能自主调节的影响:一项meta分析的系统综述
在脊髓损伤(SCI)后,心血管功能的自主调节经常中断。一项系统综述评估了非侵入性、非药物(NINP)干预对成人脊髓损伤患者心血管自主神经生物标志物的影响。med, CENTRAL, CINAHL EMBASE和MEDLINE从成立到2024年5月17日进行了检索。纳入了NINP干预在成人(≥18岁)脊髓损伤(bb0 - 3个月)心血管自主生物标志物(心率变异性[HRV]、收缩压变异性[SBPV]或压反射增益)中的随机对照试验(rct)。主要结局包括HRV(低频功率[HRV- lf]、高频功率[HRV- hf]、连续差均方根[RMSSD])、SBPV(低频功率[SBPV- lf])和气压反射灵敏度。证据的质量和确定性分别使用Cochrane第2版偏倚风险工具和首选系统评价报告项目和荟萃分析工具进行评估。在确定的2651条记录中,纳入了6项rct(参与者,n = 123)。HRV-LF(4项研究;参与者,n = 69)和HRV-HF(5项研究;参与者,n = 93)显示支持NINP干预的变化不大([g = 0.25;95%置信区间[CI] = -0.23, 0.73;P = 0.31;I2 = 0%], [g = 0.00;95% ci = -0.41, 0.42;P = 0.98;I2 = 0%])。RMSSD、SBPV-LF和气压反射增益的证据有限。本综述发现,关于NINP干预对脊髓损伤成人HRV、BPV和BRS参数的影响,证据尚无定论。需要进一步的研究与强大的方法严谨性,以提供更大的见解在这一领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信