{"title":"Lower-Extremity Muscle Strength Symmetry Assessment Through Isokinetic Dynamometry.","authors":"Yuanyuan Ren, Sheng Zhou, Guangzhen Cheng, Yueqin Tang, Guangge Wang, Aming Lu","doi":"10.3390/life15020318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to establish a dominant and non-dominant limb muscle strength evaluation model to evaluate the asymmetry of lower extremity muscle strength.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The hip, knee, ankle flexors and extensors of 86 runners were evaluated separately in different contraction modes and at different movement speeds. A principal component analysis was used to establish a model for evaluating dominant and non-dominant lower extremity muscle strength and to comprehensively evaluate the asymmetry of lower extremity muscle strength.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six main factors were present in both dominant and non-dominant indicators of lower extremity muscle strength, with dominant indicators of lower extremity muscle strength explaining 80.413% of the total variance and non-dominant indicators explaining 78.607% of the total variance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a population of healthy male runners, there were differences in the symmetry of lower limbs in the comprehensive assessment model. The main contribution of the non-dominant side was the knee muscles, and the dominant side was the hip and knee muscles, so this difference should be considered in constructing future muscle strength evaluation models. It is critical to understanding the design and function of the human muscle system, and can reduce the number of meaningful tests we perform on diverse populations and help us reduce asymmetry.</p>","PeriodicalId":56144,"journal":{"name":"Life-Basel","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11857579/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Life-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/life15020318","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to establish a dominant and non-dominant limb muscle strength evaluation model to evaluate the asymmetry of lower extremity muscle strength.
Methods: The hip, knee, ankle flexors and extensors of 86 runners were evaluated separately in different contraction modes and at different movement speeds. A principal component analysis was used to establish a model for evaluating dominant and non-dominant lower extremity muscle strength and to comprehensively evaluate the asymmetry of lower extremity muscle strength.
Results: Six main factors were present in both dominant and non-dominant indicators of lower extremity muscle strength, with dominant indicators of lower extremity muscle strength explaining 80.413% of the total variance and non-dominant indicators explaining 78.607% of the total variance.
Conclusions: In a population of healthy male runners, there were differences in the symmetry of lower limbs in the comprehensive assessment model. The main contribution of the non-dominant side was the knee muscles, and the dominant side was the hip and knee muscles, so this difference should be considered in constructing future muscle strength evaluation models. It is critical to understanding the design and function of the human muscle system, and can reduce the number of meaningful tests we perform on diverse populations and help us reduce asymmetry.
Life-BaselBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-General Biochemistry,Genetics and Molecular Biology
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
1798
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍:
Life (ISSN 2075-1729) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal of scientific studies related to fundamental themes in Life Sciences, especially those concerned with the origins of life and evolution of biosystems. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers.