Student and Educator Evaluation of the Five-Minute Peer Writing Activity.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Nurse Educator Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-25 DOI:10.1097/NNE.0000000000001830
Andrew J Richards, Zachary Hall
{"title":"Student and Educator Evaluation of the Five-Minute Peer Writing Activity.","authors":"Andrew J Richards, Zachary Hall","doi":"10.1097/NNE.0000000000001830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Educators look for practical and engaging classroom assessment techniques (CATs) to enhance the learning experience.</p><p><strong>Problem: </strong>Many CATs are individual activities that only engage learners at lower levels of Bloom's Taxonomy. The Five-Minute Peer Writing Activity (FMPWA) was developed to address this problem. This study compared student grades, engagement, and satisfaction between the FMPWA and One-Minute Paper (OMP) CAT and the effectiveness and acceptability of the FMPWA among nurse educators.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>Nursing students completed the OMP and FMPWA and rated both by engagement and satisfaction. Nurse educators attending conference workshops experienced the OMP and FMPWA and had the opportunity to complete a short survey.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>This innovative CAT showed a statistically significant increase in student grades, engagement, and satisfaction scores. Educators reported higher engagement, satisfaction, and likelihood of trying the FMPWA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The FMPWA is an effective strategy to engage nursing students in the classroom.</p>","PeriodicalId":54706,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Educator","volume":" ","pages":"207-210"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Educator","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000001830","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Educators look for practical and engaging classroom assessment techniques (CATs) to enhance the learning experience.

Problem: Many CATs are individual activities that only engage learners at lower levels of Bloom's Taxonomy. The Five-Minute Peer Writing Activity (FMPWA) was developed to address this problem. This study compared student grades, engagement, and satisfaction between the FMPWA and One-Minute Paper (OMP) CAT and the effectiveness and acceptability of the FMPWA among nurse educators.

Approach: Nursing students completed the OMP and FMPWA and rated both by engagement and satisfaction. Nurse educators attending conference workshops experienced the OMP and FMPWA and had the opportunity to complete a short survey.

Outcomes: This innovative CAT showed a statistically significant increase in student grades, engagement, and satisfaction scores. Educators reported higher engagement, satisfaction, and likelihood of trying the FMPWA.

Conclusions: The FMPWA is an effective strategy to engage nursing students in the classroom.

学生与教师对五分钟同侪写作活动的评价。
背景:教育工作者寻找实用和引人入胜的课堂评估技术(CATs)来增强学习体验。问题:许多cat是单独的活动,只吸引布鲁姆分类法较低层次的学习者。五分钟同伴写作活动(FMPWA)就是为了解决这个问题而开发的。本研究比较了FMPWA和一分钟纸(OMP) CAT之间的学生成绩、参与度和满意度,以及FMPWA在护理教育者中的有效性和可接受性。方法:护理学生完成OMP和FMPWA,并对参与和满意度进行评分。参加会议研讨会的护士教育工作者体验了OMP和FMPWA,并有机会完成一项简短的调查。结果:这种创新的CAT在统计上显著提高了学生的成绩、参与度和满意度得分。教育工作者报告了更高的参与度、满意度和尝试FMPWA的可能性。结论:FMPWA是提高护生课堂参与度的有效策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nurse Educator
Nurse Educator 医学-护理
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
300
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nurse Educator, a scholarly, peer reviewed journal for faculty and administrators in schools of nursing and nurse educators in other settings, provides practical information and research related to nursing education. Topics include program, curriculum, course, and faculty development; teaching and learning in nursing; technology in nursing education; simulation; clinical teaching and evaluation; testing and measurement; trends and issues; and research in nursing education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信