Regulatory efforts to address the access gap for foreign new drugs in China: the priority review program and related policies.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Xingyue Zhu, Jinsui Zhang
{"title":"Regulatory efforts to address the access gap for foreign new drugs in China: the priority review program and related policies.","authors":"Xingyue Zhu, Jinsui Zhang","doi":"10.1186/s41256-024-00396-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>China has implemented the priority review (PR) program and flexible registration requirements for new drugs with significant clinical value since 2016 to accelerate drug access. We aim to explore the impact of the reform efforts on the drug access gap between China and the US.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected data on the imported new drug approvals that were licensed in China between 2007 and 2023, and measured their launch delays as compared to the US. Difference-in-difference models were used to compare the launch delays of PR approvals and non-PR approvals before and after the implementation of the PR. Propensity score matching was used to construct the imputed PR and non-PR approvals in the pre-PR period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 410 imported approvals were licensed in China in 2007-2023. Most approvals (316[77.1%]) were licensed after the PR was implemented, of which 189[59.8%] received the PR designation. The difference-in-difference models found that the PR program reduced drug launch delay by 1157.0 days (robust standard error, 571.0; P<0.05) and reduced drug submission delay by 1037.3 days (robust standard error, 520.8; P<0.05). The PR identified drugs with high clinical value and informed flexible registration requirements for them, which accelerated drug submission and market entry.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings proved the importance of value-based prioritization of new drugs and flexibility in the statutory evidentiary standard in the drug approval process. Further efforts from the drug agency are needed to leverage the regulatory flexibility to provide fast market entry of new drugs without compromising their quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":52405,"journal":{"name":"Global Health Research and Policy","volume":"10 1","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11853587/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Health Research and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41256-024-00396-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: China has implemented the priority review (PR) program and flexible registration requirements for new drugs with significant clinical value since 2016 to accelerate drug access. We aim to explore the impact of the reform efforts on the drug access gap between China and the US.

Methods: We collected data on the imported new drug approvals that were licensed in China between 2007 and 2023, and measured their launch delays as compared to the US. Difference-in-difference models were used to compare the launch delays of PR approvals and non-PR approvals before and after the implementation of the PR. Propensity score matching was used to construct the imputed PR and non-PR approvals in the pre-PR period.

Results: A total of 410 imported approvals were licensed in China in 2007-2023. Most approvals (316[77.1%]) were licensed after the PR was implemented, of which 189[59.8%] received the PR designation. The difference-in-difference models found that the PR program reduced drug launch delay by 1157.0 days (robust standard error, 571.0; P<0.05) and reduced drug submission delay by 1037.3 days (robust standard error, 520.8; P<0.05). The PR identified drugs with high clinical value and informed flexible registration requirements for them, which accelerated drug submission and market entry.

Conclusions: Our findings proved the importance of value-based prioritization of new drugs and flexibility in the statutory evidentiary standard in the drug approval process. Further efforts from the drug agency are needed to leverage the regulatory flexibility to provide fast market entry of new drugs without compromising their quality.

解决外国新药在中国准入差距的监管努力:优先审评程序和相关政策。
背景:自2016年以来,中国对具有重大临床价值的新药实施了优先审评(PR)制度和灵活的注册要求,以加快药品可及性。我们旨在探讨改革对中美两国药品可及性差距的影响。方法:我们收集了2007年至2023年间在中国获得许可的进口新药的数据,并测量了它们与美国相比的上市延迟。采用差中差模型对公关实施前后的公关审批和非公关审批启动延迟进行比较,采用倾向得分匹配方法构建公关前阶段的公关和非公关审批的估算。结果:2007-2023年,中国共批准410件进口药品。大多数批准(316项[77.1%])是在PR实施后获得许可的,其中189项[59.8%]获得了PR指定。差中差模型发现PR计划使药物上市延迟减少了1157.0天(鲁棒标准误差571.0;结论:我们的研究结果证明了基于价值的新药优先级和法定证据标准灵活性在药物批准过程中的重要性。药品监管机构需要进一步努力,利用监管灵活性,在不影响其质量的情况下,使新药快速进入市场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Health Research and Policy
Global Health Research and Policy Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
1.10%
发文量
43
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Health Research and Policy, an open-access, multidisciplinary journal, publishes research on various aspects of global health, addressing topics like health equity, health systems and policy, social determinants of health, disease burden, population health, and other urgent global health issues. It serves as a forum for high-quality research focused on regional and global health improvement, emphasizing solutions for health equity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信