Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration for Choledocholithiasis in the Elderly: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Lucas Monteiro Delgado, Bernardo Fontel Pompeu, Caio Mendonça Magalhães, Eric Pasqualotto, Gabriel Henrique Acedo Martins, Abraão Alcantara de Medeiros Filho, Lucas Soares de Souza Pinto Guedes, Sergio Mazzola Poli de Figueiredo
{"title":"Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration for Choledocholithiasis in the Elderly: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Lucas Monteiro Delgado, Bernardo Fontel Pompeu, Caio Mendonça Magalhães, Eric Pasqualotto, Gabriel Henrique Acedo Martins, Abraão Alcantara de Medeiros Filho, Lucas Soares de Souza Pinto Guedes, Sergio Mazzola Poli de Figueiredo","doi":"10.1089/lap.2024.0382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) is a well-established and effective minimally invasive surgical approach for managing choledocholithiasis. However, its safety in the elderly population is not well established. Therefore, this study compares surgery-related outcomes in elderly patients undergoing LCBDE. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for studies comparing elderly and young patients undergoing LCBDE. Binary outcomes were compared using odds ratios (ORs), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was assessed with <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> statistics. Statistical analysis was performed using Software R, version 4.3.3. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Twelve studies comprising 3791 patients were included, of whom 1411 patients (37%) were from the elderly group. Elderly patients were associated with an increase in mortality (OR: 3.42; 95% CI: 1.08-10.85; <i>P</i> = .04; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%), overall postoperative complications (OR: 1.60; 95% CI: 1.11-2.22; <i>P</i> = .01; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 52%), and pneumonia (OR: 4.37; 95% CI: 2.00-9.55; <i>P</i> < .01; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%) rates. However, there were no significant differences between groups in remnant stones (OR: 1.37; 95% CI: 0.70-2.68; <i>P</i> = .36; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%) and recurrent stones (OR: 1.37; 95% CI: 0.64-2.95; <i>P</i> = .42; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%) pancreatitis (OR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.16-5.95; <i>P</i> = .98; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%) and bile leakage (OR: 1.24; 95% CI: 0.75-2.07; <i>P</i> = .40; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> In this meta-analysis, elderly patients who underwent LCBDE experienced increased mortality, overall complications, and pneumonia rates compared with young patients. Furthermore, there were no significant differences between the groups in remnant and retained stones, pancreatitis, and bile leakage.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2024.0382","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) is a well-established and effective minimally invasive surgical approach for managing choledocholithiasis. However, its safety in the elderly population is not well established. Therefore, this study compares surgery-related outcomes in elderly patients undergoing LCBDE. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for studies comparing elderly and young patients undergoing LCBDE. Binary outcomes were compared using odds ratios (ORs), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was assessed with I2 statistics. Statistical analysis was performed using Software R, version 4.3.3. Results: Twelve studies comprising 3791 patients were included, of whom 1411 patients (37%) were from the elderly group. Elderly patients were associated with an increase in mortality (OR: 3.42; 95% CI: 1.08-10.85; P = .04; I2 = 0%), overall postoperative complications (OR: 1.60; 95% CI: 1.11-2.22; P = .01; I2 = 52%), and pneumonia (OR: 4.37; 95% CI: 2.00-9.55; P < .01; I2 = 0%) rates. However, there were no significant differences between groups in remnant stones (OR: 1.37; 95% CI: 0.70-2.68; P = .36; I2 = 0%) and recurrent stones (OR: 1.37; 95% CI: 0.64-2.95; P = .42; I2 = 0%) pancreatitis (OR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.16-5.95; P = .98; I2 = 0%) and bile leakage (OR: 1.24; 95% CI: 0.75-2.07; P = .40; I2 = 0%). Conclusion: In this meta-analysis, elderly patients who underwent LCBDE experienced increased mortality, overall complications, and pneumonia rates compared with young patients. Furthermore, there were no significant differences between the groups in remnant and retained stones, pancreatitis, and bile leakage.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
163
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques (JLAST) is the leading international peer-reviewed journal for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest thinking and advanced surgical technologies in laparoscopy, endoscopy, NOTES, and robotics. The Journal is ideally suited to surgeons who are early adopters of new technology and techniques. Recognizing that many new technologies and techniques have significant overlap with several surgical specialties, JLAST is the first journal to focus on these topics both in general and pediatric surgery, and includes other surgical subspecialties such as: urology, gynecologic surgery, thoracic surgery, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信