Camille Moeckel, Robert Bower, Calista Long, Hannah Flamini, Amy Longenecker, Elizabeth M Billingsley, Eugene J Lengerich, Charlene Lam
{"title":"Sun Protection Knowledge and Behaviors Among Agricultural Industry Workers in Pennsylvania.","authors":"Camille Moeckel, Robert Bower, Calista Long, Hannah Flamini, Amy Longenecker, Elizabeth M Billingsley, Eugene J Lengerich, Charlene Lam","doi":"10.1080/1059924X.2025.2470963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Outdoor occupations like agriculture expose individuals to higher levels of ultraviolet radiation, increasing the risk of skin cancer. Although most individuals in agriculture recognize the importance of sun protection, adherence to preventive measures may be inconsistent. Our study aimed to explore sun protection behaviors among agricultural industry workers in Pennsylvania and identify specific barriers faced in practicing sun safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a convenience sample survey at the largest indoor agriculture exposition in the country (Pennsylvania Farm Show). The survey, based on established measures, assessed sun protection practices among agricultural industry workers using a 2-page questionnaire covering demographics, sun protection habits, barriers, and skin examination history. Exclusion criteria included not identifying as an agricultural industry worker, age under 18, and inability to read and understand English. Descriptive statistics, chi-squared tests, and multivariable logistic regression, controlling for age, gender, education, skin tone, previous skin cancer diagnosis, and occupational sector, were employed in analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate was 86%, with 7 of 202 surveys excluded (<i>n</i> = 195). Regarding sun exposure knowledge, 63.1% believed their skin cancer risk was higher than indoor workers, and 80.0% perceived unprotected sun exposure as harmful. However, 71.8% reported infrequent sunscreen use. The most common barrier to sun protection was forgetting (49.2%), and 59.0% noted their workplace lacked built-in sun protection. Regression models revealed lower education, darker skin tones, and male gender as significant predictors of underestimating sun exposure risks (<i>p</i> < .01). Men were less likely than women to discuss sun protection with their primary care providers, undergo skin checks, or receive sun protection information from healthcare providers (<i>p</i> < .05). Additionally, men were less likely than women to regularly wear and reapply sunscreen but more likely to wear hats of any type (<i>p</i> < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite awareness of skin cancer risk, reported sun protection usage among agricultural industry workers in Pennsylvania was inconsistent, highlighting the need for interventions tailored to addressing barriers like forgetfulness. This study compares sun protection practices between occupational sectors within agriculture. Future qualitative research studies focusing on specific sectors and their unique practices are crucial for developing tailored messaging strategies and targeted, workplace-based interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":49172,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agromedicine","volume":" ","pages":"529-545"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agromedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1059924X.2025.2470963","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Outdoor occupations like agriculture expose individuals to higher levels of ultraviolet radiation, increasing the risk of skin cancer. Although most individuals in agriculture recognize the importance of sun protection, adherence to preventive measures may be inconsistent. Our study aimed to explore sun protection behaviors among agricultural industry workers in Pennsylvania and identify specific barriers faced in practicing sun safety.
Methods: We conducted a convenience sample survey at the largest indoor agriculture exposition in the country (Pennsylvania Farm Show). The survey, based on established measures, assessed sun protection practices among agricultural industry workers using a 2-page questionnaire covering demographics, sun protection habits, barriers, and skin examination history. Exclusion criteria included not identifying as an agricultural industry worker, age under 18, and inability to read and understand English. Descriptive statistics, chi-squared tests, and multivariable logistic regression, controlling for age, gender, education, skin tone, previous skin cancer diagnosis, and occupational sector, were employed in analysis.
Results: The response rate was 86%, with 7 of 202 surveys excluded (n = 195). Regarding sun exposure knowledge, 63.1% believed their skin cancer risk was higher than indoor workers, and 80.0% perceived unprotected sun exposure as harmful. However, 71.8% reported infrequent sunscreen use. The most common barrier to sun protection was forgetting (49.2%), and 59.0% noted their workplace lacked built-in sun protection. Regression models revealed lower education, darker skin tones, and male gender as significant predictors of underestimating sun exposure risks (p < .01). Men were less likely than women to discuss sun protection with their primary care providers, undergo skin checks, or receive sun protection information from healthcare providers (p < .05). Additionally, men were less likely than women to regularly wear and reapply sunscreen but more likely to wear hats of any type (p < .05).
Conclusion: Despite awareness of skin cancer risk, reported sun protection usage among agricultural industry workers in Pennsylvania was inconsistent, highlighting the need for interventions tailored to addressing barriers like forgetfulness. This study compares sun protection practices between occupational sectors within agriculture. Future qualitative research studies focusing on specific sectors and their unique practices are crucial for developing tailored messaging strategies and targeted, workplace-based interventions.
目的:像农业这样的户外职业使个体暴露在更高水平的紫外线辐射下,增加了患皮肤癌的风险。虽然大多数从事农业的人都认识到防晒的重要性,但坚持采取预防措施的情况可能不一致。我们的研究旨在探讨宾夕法尼亚州农业工人的防晒行为,并确定在实践阳光安全时面临的具体障碍。方法:我们在全国最大的室内农业博览会(宾夕法尼亚农场展)进行了方便的抽样调查。该调查基于既定的测量方法,使用一份两页的调查问卷评估了农业工人的防晒行为,调查问卷包括人口统计、防晒习惯、屏障和皮肤检查史。排除标准包括非农业工人、年龄在18岁以下、不能阅读和理解英语。分析采用描述性统计、卡方检验和多变量logistic回归,控制年龄、性别、教育程度、肤色、既往皮肤癌诊断和职业部门。结果:202份调查中有7份(n = 195)被排除,有效率为86%。在阳光照射知识方面,63.1%的人认为他们患皮肤癌的风险高于室内工作者,80.0%的人认为无保护的阳光照射有害。然而,71.8%的人表示不经常使用防晒霜。最常见的防晒屏障是忘记(49.2%),59.0%的人表示他们的工作场所没有内置防晒装置。回归模型显示,受教育程度较低、肤色较深和男性性别是低估日晒风险的重要预测因素(p p p)。结论:尽管人们意识到皮肤癌的风险,但据报道,宾夕法尼亚州农业工人的防晒使用情况并不一致,这凸显了针对健忘等障碍进行干预的必要性。这项研究比较了农业职业部门之间的防晒措施。未来着重于特定部门及其独特做法的定性研究对于制定量身定制的信息传递策略和有针对性的、基于工作场所的干预措施至关重要。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Agromedicine: Practice, Policy, and Research publishes translational research, reports and editorials related to agricultural health, safety and medicine. The Journal of Agromedicine seeks to engage the global agricultural health and safety community including rural health care providers, agricultural health and safety practitioners, academic researchers, government agencies, policy makers, and others. The Journal of Agromedicine is committed to providing its readers with relevant, rigorously peer-reviewed, original articles. The journal welcomes high quality submissions as they relate to agricultural health and safety in the areas of:
• Behavioral and Mental Health
• Climate Change
• Education/Training
• Emerging Practices
• Environmental Public Health
• Epidemiology
• Ergonomics
• Injury Prevention
• Occupational and Industrial Health
• Pesticides
• Policy
• Safety Interventions and Evaluation
• Technology