Henry Stabler, Chelsey Kirkland, Jaclyn Frank, Rachel Price, Jonathon Leider
{"title":"Minnesota Public Health Corps: A Qualitative Assessment of AmeriCorps' Members Experiences.","authors":"Henry Stabler, Chelsey Kirkland, Jaclyn Frank, Rachel Price, Jonathon Leider","doi":"10.1097/PHH.0000000000002145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Long-standing gaps in public health capacity exist due to extensive workforce shortages, particularly in governmental public health (GPH); these gaps were worsened during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. In response, the federal government established Public Health AmeriCorps (PHA), which supported the integration of AmeriCorps members in public health systems. Minnesota Public Health Corps (MNPHC) prioritized placing members in GPH agencies to increase GPH capacity. Initial evaluation results (2022-2023) suggest that program members were well-integrated into agencies. This article reports on the contextual information offered by MNPHC members throughout their service, including the specific programs and activities members implemented, to better explain how members were successful at extending agencies' capacity.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Activities, challenges, and successes of members during their service are described to better explain how members were successful at extending their sites' capacity.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Descriptive qualitative methods using data reported each month by 60 members.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>GPH agencies with at least one AmeriCorps member.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>MNPHC members and GPH agencies.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>MNPHC members at GPH agencies across Minnesota who implemented service plans.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>Outcomes of interest included salient themes within MNPHC members' (1) activities, (2) encountered challenges and barriers, (3) successes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MNPHC members implemented public health activities that helped bolster the capacity at host sites. The most common activities were related to public health communications, community engagement, and data analysis. Reported successes were largely concerned with progress made on the different activities being implemented by members. Members also reported few challenges; however, most reported challenges related to common issues encountered in public health, such as difficulty working with community partners or finding available data.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MNPHC offers a compelling model that provides support to the GPH workforce while also offering those considering a career in GPH an opportunity to experience a range of public health activities.</p>","PeriodicalId":47855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000002145","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Context: Long-standing gaps in public health capacity exist due to extensive workforce shortages, particularly in governmental public health (GPH); these gaps were worsened during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. In response, the federal government established Public Health AmeriCorps (PHA), which supported the integration of AmeriCorps members in public health systems. Minnesota Public Health Corps (MNPHC) prioritized placing members in GPH agencies to increase GPH capacity. Initial evaluation results (2022-2023) suggest that program members were well-integrated into agencies. This article reports on the contextual information offered by MNPHC members throughout their service, including the specific programs and activities members implemented, to better explain how members were successful at extending agencies' capacity.
Objectives: Activities, challenges, and successes of members during their service are described to better explain how members were successful at extending their sites' capacity.
Design: Descriptive qualitative methods using data reported each month by 60 members.
Setting: GPH agencies with at least one AmeriCorps member.
Participants: MNPHC members and GPH agencies.
Intervention: MNPHC members at GPH agencies across Minnesota who implemented service plans.
Main outcome measure: Outcomes of interest included salient themes within MNPHC members' (1) activities, (2) encountered challenges and barriers, (3) successes.
Results: MNPHC members implemented public health activities that helped bolster the capacity at host sites. The most common activities were related to public health communications, community engagement, and data analysis. Reported successes were largely concerned with progress made on the different activities being implemented by members. Members also reported few challenges; however, most reported challenges related to common issues encountered in public health, such as difficulty working with community partners or finding available data.
Conclusions: MNPHC offers a compelling model that provides support to the GPH workforce while also offering those considering a career in GPH an opportunity to experience a range of public health activities.
背景:由于劳动力普遍短缺,特别是在政府公共卫生部门,公共卫生能力存在长期差距;在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间和之后,这些差距进一步恶化。作为回应,联邦政府建立了公共卫生美国服务队(Public Health AmeriCorps, PHA),支持美国服务队成员融入公共卫生系统。明尼苏达州公共卫生团(MNPHC)优先将成员安置在GPH机构,以提高GPH的能力。初步评估结果(2022-2023)表明,项目成员很好地融入了各机构。本文报告了MNPHC成员在整个服务过程中提供的背景信息,包括成员实施的具体计划和活动,以更好地解释成员如何成功地扩展机构的能力。目的:描述会员在服务期间的活动、挑战和成功,以更好地解释会员如何成功地扩展其站点的容量。设计:采用描述性定性方法,使用60名成员每月报告的数据。背景:至少有一名美国志愿队成员的GPH机构。参与者:MNPHC成员和GPH机构。干预:明尼苏达州实施服务计划的GPH机构的MNPHC成员。主要结果测量:感兴趣的结果包括MNPHC成员(1)活动中的突出主题,(2)遇到的挑战和障碍,(3)成功。结果:MNPHC成员实施了公共卫生活动,帮助加强了东道国的能力。最常见的活动与公共卫生传播、社区参与和数据分析有关。报告的成功主要与各成员正在执行的不同活动所取得的进展有关。成员们也报告了很少的挑战;然而,大多数报告的挑战与公共卫生中遇到的共同问题有关,例如难以与社区伙伴合作或查找现有数据。结论:MNPHC提供了一个令人信服的模式,为GPH工作人员提供支持,同时也为那些考虑在GPH工作的人提供了一个体验一系列公共卫生活动的机会。
期刊介绍:
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice publishes articles which focus on evidence based public health practice and research. The journal is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed publication guided by a multidisciplinary editorial board of administrators, practitioners and scientists. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice publishes in a wide range of population health topics including research to practice; emergency preparedness; bioterrorism; infectious disease surveillance; environmental health; community health assessment, chronic disease prevention and health promotion, and academic-practice linkages.