Usability of technological tools to overcome language barriers in healthcare- a scoping review.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Annika Kreienbrinck, Saskia Hanft-Robert, Alina Ioana Forray, Asithandile Nozewu, Mike Mösko
{"title":"Usability of technological tools to overcome language barriers in healthcare- a scoping review.","authors":"Annika Kreienbrinck, Saskia Hanft-Robert, Alina Ioana Forray, Asithandile Nozewu, Mike Mösko","doi":"10.1186/s13690-025-01543-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In many healthcare contexts globally, where the languages of care providers and service users do not match, miscommunication can lead to inaccurate diagnoses and subpar treatment outcomes. The development and use of technological tools to overcome language barriers are increasing, but usability and evaluation of these tools vary widely.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This scoping review's objectives are (i) to identify and describe the technological tools used in direct service user-provider communication to overcome language barriers in a healthcare setting, (ii) to identify how the usability of these tools was evaluated, and (iii) to identify the challenges and benefits of using such technological tools.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>The scoping review followed the JBI methodology. Studies published between January 2019 and July 2024 were identified using a search strategy with variations of the keywords \"technological tools,\" \"language barrier,\" and \"health care\" in the following six databases and research platforms: PubMed, PsycArticle, Scopus, EBSCOhost, ProQuest, and Web of Science. All literature on individuals using a technological tool to overcome language barriers in a healthcare context was included and exported into the screening assistant software Rayyan. The search was limited to articles written in German or English. The literature was screened twice by three independent reviewers in a blinded fashion, and all relevant data were presented in a descriptive summary.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on 16 publications, this scoping review identified 16 technological tools, categorized as fixed-phrase or machine translation apps, to overcome language barriers in a healthcare setting. Usability was assessed in 13 publications applying diverse methods, i.e., surveys, observations, and application data analysis. Technological tools hold potential as a means to address language barriers in healthcare by facilitating communication and supporting diagnostic processes. However, their usability is often constrained by challenges related to translation accuracy, accessibility, and learnability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Future research and policy efforts should focus on standardizing evaluation methods and diversifying development regionally, linguistically, and interdisciplinary. Rather than broadly promoting these tools, emphasis should be placed on ensuring they are reliable and efficient for their intended use to maximize their effectiveness and relevance in specific healthcare contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":48578,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Public Health","volume":"83 1","pages":"52"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11852517/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-025-01543-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In many healthcare contexts globally, where the languages of care providers and service users do not match, miscommunication can lead to inaccurate diagnoses and subpar treatment outcomes. The development and use of technological tools to overcome language barriers are increasing, but usability and evaluation of these tools vary widely.

Objectives: This scoping review's objectives are (i) to identify and describe the technological tools used in direct service user-provider communication to overcome language barriers in a healthcare setting, (ii) to identify how the usability of these tools was evaluated, and (iii) to identify the challenges and benefits of using such technological tools.

Methods and analysis: The scoping review followed the JBI methodology. Studies published between January 2019 and July 2024 were identified using a search strategy with variations of the keywords "technological tools," "language barrier," and "health care" in the following six databases and research platforms: PubMed, PsycArticle, Scopus, EBSCOhost, ProQuest, and Web of Science. All literature on individuals using a technological tool to overcome language barriers in a healthcare context was included and exported into the screening assistant software Rayyan. The search was limited to articles written in German or English. The literature was screened twice by three independent reviewers in a blinded fashion, and all relevant data were presented in a descriptive summary.

Results: Based on 16 publications, this scoping review identified 16 technological tools, categorized as fixed-phrase or machine translation apps, to overcome language barriers in a healthcare setting. Usability was assessed in 13 publications applying diverse methods, i.e., surveys, observations, and application data analysis. Technological tools hold potential as a means to address language barriers in healthcare by facilitating communication and supporting diagnostic processes. However, their usability is often constrained by challenges related to translation accuracy, accessibility, and learnability.

Conclusion: Future research and policy efforts should focus on standardizing evaluation methods and diversifying development regionally, linguistically, and interdisciplinary. Rather than broadly promoting these tools, emphasis should be placed on ensuring they are reliable and efficient for their intended use to maximize their effectiveness and relevance in specific healthcare contexts.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives of Public Health
Archives of Public Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
244
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: rchives of Public Health is a broad scope public health journal, dedicated to publishing all sound science in the field of public health. The journal aims to better the understanding of the health of populations. The journal contributes to public health knowledge, enhances the interaction between research, policy and practice and stimulates public health monitoring and indicator development. The journal considers submissions on health outcomes and their determinants, with clear statements about the public health and policy implications. Archives of Public Health welcomes methodological papers (e.g., on study design and bias), papers on health services research, health economics, community interventions, and epidemiological studies dealing with international comparisons, the determinants of inequality in health, and the environmental, behavioural, social, demographic and occupational correlates of health and diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信