Jan Hambrecht, Paul Köhli, Erika Chiapparelli, Ranqing Lan, Marco D Burkhard, Franziska C S Altorfer, Gisberto Evangelisti, Ali E Guven, Koki Tsuchiya, Roland Duculan, Jennifer Shue, Andrew A Sama, Frank P Cammisa, Federico P Girardi, Carol A Mancuso, Alexander P Hughes
{"title":"Risk Factors for Postoperative Non-Satisfaction despite ODI Improvement in Patients undergoing Elective Lumbar Surgery.","authors":"Jan Hambrecht, Paul Köhli, Erika Chiapparelli, Ranqing Lan, Marco D Burkhard, Franziska C S Altorfer, Gisberto Evangelisti, Ali E Guven, Koki Tsuchiya, Roland Duculan, Jennifer Shue, Andrew A Sama, Frank P Cammisa, Federico P Girardi, Carol A Mancuso, Alexander P Hughes","doi":"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Secondary analysis of prospective study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the risk factors for postoperative non-satisfaction despite improvement in the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) two years after elective lumbar surgery.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>The ODI and postoperative satisfaction are important markers of postoperative success. While ODI improvement is expected to correlate with satisfaction, their exact relationship remains unclear. Additionally, some patients may achieve functional improvement yet report non-satisfaction postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A secondary analysis was performed on a prospective study of patients undergoing lumbar surgery for degenerative conditions. Patients with a 2-year ODI and satisfaction follow-up were included. Risk factors for non-satisfaction despite ODI improvement were investigated using t-tests, Wilcoxon-tests, and Fisher's-exact-tests. Significant variables were analyzed with multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>355 patients (65±10 y, 58% female) were included. Non-satisfied patients showed significantly higher scores in pre- (64[52-76], P<0.001) and postoperative (36[20-44], P<0.001) ODI and lower absolute (18[8-30], P<0.001) and percentage (30[17-52], P<0.001) improvement rates from pre- to postoperatively. Higher baseline (OR1.03, 95%CI 1.01-1.05, P<0.001) and postoperative (OR1.08, 95%CI 1.06-1.10, P<0.001) ODI scores, and lower absolute (OR0.94, 95%CI 0.92-0.96, P<0.001) and percentage (OR0.95, 95%CI 0.94-0.97, P<0.001) improvement rates, were significant risk factors for experiencing non-satisfaction, despite ODI improvement. Higher fat infiltration (FI) of the multifidus (MF) (OR1.03, 95%CI 1.00-1.06, P=0.042) or the erector spinae (ES) (OR1.06, 95%CI 1.03-1.09, P<0.001) were significantly correlated with postoperative non-satisfaction, after adjusting for covariates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Higher pre- and postoperative ODI scores and lower ODI improvement were linked to postoperative non-satisfaction. Higher FI in the MF or ES was also a significant risk factor for postoperative non-satisfaction, despite ODI improvement. The findings highlight that postoperative satisfaction is influenced by various factors affected by ODI-measured disability. Additionally, paraspinal muscle health greatly affects postoperative outcomes and should guide preoperative planning and postoperative care.</p>","PeriodicalId":22193,"journal":{"name":"Spine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005316","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Study design: Secondary analysis of prospective study.
Objective: To assess the risk factors for postoperative non-satisfaction despite improvement in the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) two years after elective lumbar surgery.
Background: The ODI and postoperative satisfaction are important markers of postoperative success. While ODI improvement is expected to correlate with satisfaction, their exact relationship remains unclear. Additionally, some patients may achieve functional improvement yet report non-satisfaction postoperatively.
Methods: A secondary analysis was performed on a prospective study of patients undergoing lumbar surgery for degenerative conditions. Patients with a 2-year ODI and satisfaction follow-up were included. Risk factors for non-satisfaction despite ODI improvement were investigated using t-tests, Wilcoxon-tests, and Fisher's-exact-tests. Significant variables were analyzed with multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for covariates.
Results: 355 patients (65±10 y, 58% female) were included. Non-satisfied patients showed significantly higher scores in pre- (64[52-76], P<0.001) and postoperative (36[20-44], P<0.001) ODI and lower absolute (18[8-30], P<0.001) and percentage (30[17-52], P<0.001) improvement rates from pre- to postoperatively. Higher baseline (OR1.03, 95%CI 1.01-1.05, P<0.001) and postoperative (OR1.08, 95%CI 1.06-1.10, P<0.001) ODI scores, and lower absolute (OR0.94, 95%CI 0.92-0.96, P<0.001) and percentage (OR0.95, 95%CI 0.94-0.97, P<0.001) improvement rates, were significant risk factors for experiencing non-satisfaction, despite ODI improvement. Higher fat infiltration (FI) of the multifidus (MF) (OR1.03, 95%CI 1.00-1.06, P=0.042) or the erector spinae (ES) (OR1.06, 95%CI 1.03-1.09, P<0.001) were significantly correlated with postoperative non-satisfaction, after adjusting for covariates.
Conclusion: Higher pre- and postoperative ODI scores and lower ODI improvement were linked to postoperative non-satisfaction. Higher FI in the MF or ES was also a significant risk factor for postoperative non-satisfaction, despite ODI improvement. The findings highlight that postoperative satisfaction is influenced by various factors affected by ODI-measured disability. Additionally, paraspinal muscle health greatly affects postoperative outcomes and should guide preoperative planning and postoperative care.
期刊介绍:
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store.
Recognized internationally as the leading journal in its field, Spine is an international, peer-reviewed, bi-weekly periodical that considers for publication original articles in the field of Spine. It is the leading subspecialty journal for the treatment of spinal disorders. Only original papers are considered for publication with the understanding that they are contributed solely to Spine. The Journal does not publish articles reporting material that has been reported at length elsewhere.