Effects of Repair Interface Structure on Mechanical Properties of Scarf Repair for Composite Laminate Plates.

IF 4.7 3区 工程技术 Q1 POLYMER SCIENCE
Polymers Pub Date : 2025-02-16 DOI:10.3390/polym17040511
Kaomin Zhang, Zhenhu Miao, Haiting Xia, Xiaoyu Yang, Fenglin Tian, Yinghui Zhao
{"title":"Effects of Repair Interface Structure on Mechanical Properties of Scarf Repair for Composite Laminate Plates.","authors":"Kaomin Zhang, Zhenhu Miao, Haiting Xia, Xiaoyu Yang, Fenglin Tian, Yinghui Zhao","doi":"10.3390/polym17040511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The structural damage repair of composite material is an important issue that needs to be addressed during the service life of composite materials. To investigate the effects of a scarf structure and scarf angle on the repair quality of composite material, this paper proposes a mixed-scarf (MS) repair structure that combines ramped-scarf (RS) and stepped-scarf (SS) repair structures. The effect of the repair structure on the mechanical properties was analyzed, as well as the quality of the adhesive interface. The results show that at a scarf angle of 10°, the repair efficiency and the quality of adhesive interface are better than that of scarf angles of 20° and 30°. At a scarf angle of 10°, the recovery degree of the flexural strength of the MS repair structure is 79.72%, which is 6.77% and 38.24% higher than that of the RS and SS repair structures, respectively. However, in terms of flexural modulus, regardless of repair structure, the flexural modulus is highest at a scarf angle of 20°. Furthermore, the impact strength of the MS repair structure is approximately 87.60% that of the RS repair structure; additionally, it exhibits an increase of 45.83% compared to the SS repair structure. Overall, the quality of the adhesive interface for the RS and MS repair structures is similar and better than that of the SS repair structure. In conclusion, the MS repair structure is well suited for small-angle scarf repairs, whereas the RS repair structure is more appropriate for large-angle repairs; in contrast, the SS repair structure demonstrates the least effective performance in terms of repair outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":20416,"journal":{"name":"Polymers","volume":"17 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11858822/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polymers","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17040511","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLYMER SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The structural damage repair of composite material is an important issue that needs to be addressed during the service life of composite materials. To investigate the effects of a scarf structure and scarf angle on the repair quality of composite material, this paper proposes a mixed-scarf (MS) repair structure that combines ramped-scarf (RS) and stepped-scarf (SS) repair structures. The effect of the repair structure on the mechanical properties was analyzed, as well as the quality of the adhesive interface. The results show that at a scarf angle of 10°, the repair efficiency and the quality of adhesive interface are better than that of scarf angles of 20° and 30°. At a scarf angle of 10°, the recovery degree of the flexural strength of the MS repair structure is 79.72%, which is 6.77% and 38.24% higher than that of the RS and SS repair structures, respectively. However, in terms of flexural modulus, regardless of repair structure, the flexural modulus is highest at a scarf angle of 20°. Furthermore, the impact strength of the MS repair structure is approximately 87.60% that of the RS repair structure; additionally, it exhibits an increase of 45.83% compared to the SS repair structure. Overall, the quality of the adhesive interface for the RS and MS repair structures is similar and better than that of the SS repair structure. In conclusion, the MS repair structure is well suited for small-angle scarf repairs, whereas the RS repair structure is more appropriate for large-angle repairs; in contrast, the SS repair structure demonstrates the least effective performance in terms of repair outcomes.

修复界面结构对复合材料层压板疤痕修复机械性能的影响
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Polymers
Polymers POLYMER SCIENCE-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
16.00%
发文量
4697
审稿时长
1.3 months
期刊介绍: Polymers (ISSN 2073-4360) is an international, open access journal of polymer science. It publishes research papers, short communications and review papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Polymers provides an interdisciplinary forum for publishing papers which advance the fields of (i) polymerization methods, (ii) theory, simulation, and modeling, (iii) understanding of new physical phenomena, (iv) advances in characterization techniques, and (v) harnessing of self-assembly and biological strategies for producing complex multifunctional structures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信