B Firlatan, G S Kart Bayram, G Ayan, E Karabulut, U Kalyoncu
{"title":"Sex distribution in psoriatic arthritis: a systematic literature review.","authors":"B Firlatan, G S Kart Bayram, G Ayan, E Karabulut, U Kalyoncu","doi":"10.1080/03009742.2025.2465014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Although the prevalence of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is considered equal between the sexes, recent PsA studies have reported a female predominance, with female-to-male ratios between 1.2:1 and 2:1. It is not clear whether this is related to a change in the epidemiology of the disease or to different patterns of patients attending outpatient clinics. We aimed to assess the female-to-male ratios in recent PsA studies.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A systematic review of the literature (January 2020 to September 2022) was performed using the PubMed database with keywords and MeSH terms referring to 'psoriatic arthritis'. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and cross-sectional, prospective, and retrospective cohort studies involving at least 20 patients and specifying the number of males and females were considered eligible.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2800 initially identified articles, 481 eligible studies with 871 144 participants were analysed, revealing a female majority (54.1%). When we evaluated the studies based on their design, we found that female sex was more predominant in each type of design, with retrospective cohort studies having the highest prevalence. According to the number of centres involved, multi-centre studies demonstrated a greater representation of female participants than single-centre studies (54% vs 50%). Regarding the geographical locations, studies conducted in America, Europe, and multinational contexts displayed a female predominance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In our assessment, RCTs had the closest sex equality, with a slight preponderance of females. The real-life and multi-centre studies had more pronounced female rates, with several differences observed in different geographical locations.</p>","PeriodicalId":21424,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03009742.2025.2465014","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Although the prevalence of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is considered equal between the sexes, recent PsA studies have reported a female predominance, with female-to-male ratios between 1.2:1 and 2:1. It is not clear whether this is related to a change in the epidemiology of the disease or to different patterns of patients attending outpatient clinics. We aimed to assess the female-to-male ratios in recent PsA studies.
Method: A systematic review of the literature (January 2020 to September 2022) was performed using the PubMed database with keywords and MeSH terms referring to 'psoriatic arthritis'. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and cross-sectional, prospective, and retrospective cohort studies involving at least 20 patients and specifying the number of males and females were considered eligible.
Results: From 2800 initially identified articles, 481 eligible studies with 871 144 participants were analysed, revealing a female majority (54.1%). When we evaluated the studies based on their design, we found that female sex was more predominant in each type of design, with retrospective cohort studies having the highest prevalence. According to the number of centres involved, multi-centre studies demonstrated a greater representation of female participants than single-centre studies (54% vs 50%). Regarding the geographical locations, studies conducted in America, Europe, and multinational contexts displayed a female predominance.
Conclusion: In our assessment, RCTs had the closest sex equality, with a slight preponderance of females. The real-life and multi-centre studies had more pronounced female rates, with several differences observed in different geographical locations.
期刊介绍:
Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology is the official journal of the Scandinavian Society for Rheumatology, a non-profit organization following the statutes of the Scandinavian Society for Rheumatology/Scandinavian Research Foundation. The main objective of the Foundation is to support research and promote information and knowledge about rheumatology and related fields. The annual surplus by running the Journal is awarded to young, talented, researchers within the field of rheumatology.pasting
The Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology is an international scientific journal covering clinical and experimental aspects of rheumatic diseases. The journal provides essential reading for rheumatologists as well as general practitioners, orthopaedic surgeons, radiologists, pharmacologists, pathologists and other health professionals with an interest in patients with rheumatic diseases.
The journal publishes original articles as well as reviews, editorials, letters and supplements within the various fields of clinical and experimental rheumatology, including;
Epidemiology
Aetiology and pathogenesis
Treatment and prophylaxis
Laboratory aspects including genetics, biochemistry, immunology, immunopathology, microbiology, histopathology, pathophysiology and pharmacology
Radiological aspects including X-ray, ultrasonography, CT, MRI and other forms of imaging.