Living with Elevated Lipoprotein(a) Levels: The Experiences of Patients and Caregivers.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Patient preference and adherence Pub Date : 2025-02-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/PPA.S478623
Elisabeth Steinhagen-Thiessen, Magdalena Daccord, Emma C Print, Yujiao Wang, Janine Shipton, India Rijken, Michael Shipton, Flavia Perna, Matthias Schoenberger
{"title":"Living with Elevated Lipoprotein(a) Levels: The Experiences of Patients and Caregivers.","authors":"Elisabeth Steinhagen-Thiessen, Magdalena Daccord, Emma C Print, Yujiao Wang, Janine Shipton, India Rijken, Michael Shipton, Flavia Perna, Matthias Schoenberger","doi":"10.2147/PPA.S478623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Elevated lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) is an inherited condition that increases cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, independent of other factors, such as low-density lipoprotein C. Few attempts have been made to explore the life experiences of people with elevated Lp(a).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the experiences of people living with or caring for a relative with elevated Lp(a).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two multinational, virtual, interactive, moderated discussions of specific questions between people with elevated Lp(a) and relatives (caregivers), with experienced clinicians attending.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen individuals with elevated Lp(a) and nine relatives took part in the virtual discussions. The most frequent reasons to measure Lp(a) levels were prior CVD events, eg, heart attacks, stroke, aortic valve diseases, or a family history of CVD events. Clinicians were often reluctant to measure Lp(a) levels as no effective treatment is available to people with elevated values. The most common interventions after confirmed elevated Lp(a) levels were lifestyle modifications and cholesterol-lowering medications to reduce overall CVD risk. A healthy lifestyle with diet and exercise was perceived as unsuccessful in managing overall CVD risk by 25% of people with elevated Lp(a) and 38% of relatives. Lifestyle advice was considered conflicting, unclear and inconsistent. Participants experienced elevated Lp(a) as an \"invisible\" disorder with very low awareness in the general population. Physicians' advice was often too superficial to meet patients' needs, putting insufficient emphasis on prevention and focusing on interventions after a CVD event.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Elevated Lp(a) was considered an \"invisible\" disorder with limited understanding among physicians and the general public. This reduces access to tests and shifts physician focus away from prevention towards reactive intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":19972,"journal":{"name":"Patient preference and adherence","volume":"19 ","pages":"395-405"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11853138/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient preference and adherence","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S478623","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Elevated lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) is an inherited condition that increases cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, independent of other factors, such as low-density lipoprotein C. Few attempts have been made to explore the life experiences of people with elevated Lp(a).

Objective: To explore the experiences of people living with or caring for a relative with elevated Lp(a).

Methods: Two multinational, virtual, interactive, moderated discussions of specific questions between people with elevated Lp(a) and relatives (caregivers), with experienced clinicians attending.

Results: Fifteen individuals with elevated Lp(a) and nine relatives took part in the virtual discussions. The most frequent reasons to measure Lp(a) levels were prior CVD events, eg, heart attacks, stroke, aortic valve diseases, or a family history of CVD events. Clinicians were often reluctant to measure Lp(a) levels as no effective treatment is available to people with elevated values. The most common interventions after confirmed elevated Lp(a) levels were lifestyle modifications and cholesterol-lowering medications to reduce overall CVD risk. A healthy lifestyle with diet and exercise was perceived as unsuccessful in managing overall CVD risk by 25% of people with elevated Lp(a) and 38% of relatives. Lifestyle advice was considered conflicting, unclear and inconsistent. Participants experienced elevated Lp(a) as an "invisible" disorder with very low awareness in the general population. Physicians' advice was often too superficial to meet patients' needs, putting insufficient emphasis on prevention and focusing on interventions after a CVD event.

Conclusion: Elevated Lp(a) was considered an "invisible" disorder with limited understanding among physicians and the general public. This reduces access to tests and shifts physician focus away from prevention towards reactive intervention.

生活与高脂蛋白(a)水平:患者和护理人员的经验。
背景:脂蛋白(a)升高(Lp[a])是一种遗传性疾病,可增加心血管疾病(CVD)的风险,独立于其他因素,如低密度脂蛋白c。很少有人尝试探索脂蛋白(a)升高患者的生活经历。目的:探讨与Lp(a)升高的亲属一起生活或照顾他们的经历。方法:两个跨国的,虚拟的,互动的,在Lp(a)升高的人与亲属(照顾者)之间进行特定问题的讨论,有经验丰富的临床医生参加。结果:15名Lp(a)升高的患者和9名亲属参加了虚拟讨论。测量Lp(a)水平最常见的原因是既往心血管事件,如心脏病发作、中风、主动脉瓣疾病或心血管事件家族史。临床医生通常不愿意测量Lp(a)水平,因为没有有效的治疗方法可用于升高的人。在确认Lp(a)水平升高后,最常见的干预措施是改变生活方式和使用降胆固醇药物来降低总体心血管疾病风险。25%的Lp(A)升高的患者和38%的亲属认为,健康的生活方式(包括饮食和运动)在控制总体心血管疾病风险方面不成功。生活方式建议被认为是相互矛盾的、不明确的和不一致的。参与者经历了Lp(a)升高,这是一种“看不见的”疾病,在一般人群中意识非常低。医生的建议往往过于肤浅,无法满足患者的需求,对预防的重视不够,对心血管疾病事件发生后的干预措施重视不够。结论:Lp(a)升高被认为是一种“看不见的”疾病,医生和公众对其理解有限。这减少了获得检测的机会,并使医生的注意力从预防转向被动干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Patient preference and adherence
Patient preference and adherence MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
354
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Patient Preference and Adherence is an international, peer reviewed, open access journal that focuses on the growing importance of patient preference and adherence throughout the therapeutic continuum. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research, modeling and clinical studies across all therapeutic areas. Patient satisfaction, acceptability, quality of life, compliance, persistence and their role in developing new therapeutic modalities and compounds to optimize clinical outcomes for existing disease states are major areas of interest for the journal. As of 1st April 2019, Patient Preference and Adherence will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信