Hypo-fractionated versus standard fractionation radiotherapy in frail and elderly patients with central nervous system solitary fibrous tumors.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Oncology Pub Date : 2025-02-25 DOI:10.1159/000543847
Ory Haisraely, Marcia Jaffe, Alisa Taliansky, Zvi Cohen, Yaakov Lawerence
{"title":"Hypo-fractionated versus standard fractionation radiotherapy in frail and elderly patients with central nervous system solitary fibrous tumors.","authors":"Ory Haisraely, Marcia Jaffe, Alisa Taliansky, Zvi Cohen, Yaakov Lawerence","doi":"10.1159/000543847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Central nervous system solitary fibrous tumors (cSFTs) are rare, accounting for less than 1% of CNS tumors. Treatment guidelines are limited, especially for frail or elderly patients. Gross total resection followed by radiotherapy is recommended for higher-grade cases, but the role of hypofractionated radiotherapy (HF) versus standard fractionation (SF) in this population remains unclear. This study evaluates outcomes of HF compared to SF in frail patients with cSFT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of 51 frail patients (age >65, KPS <80) with cSFT treated from 2005-2023 was performed. Patients received either HF (21 patients) or SF (30 patients). Data extracted included demographics, tumor characteristics, surgical outcomes, radiation regimens, and oncologic outcomes. Descriptive and survival analyses were conducted using Kaplan-Meier methods, with multivariable analysis via Cox regression models to assess factors influencing local control and overall survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median follow-up was 19 months (11-55 months). HF regimens varied from 35-48 Gy in 10-15 fractions, while SF was predominantly 54-60 Gy in 28-30 fractions. Local control was achieved in 76.2% of HF and 80% of SF patients (p=0.154). No statistical difference in overall survival was observed between HF (18 months) and SF (18 months, p=0.54). Higher tumor grade (HR=3.5, p=0.021) and incomplete resection (HR=0.72, p=0.035) negatively impacted local control. KPS ≤50 was associated with reduced survival (HR=2.3, p=0.035).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hypofractionated radiotherapy appears feasible and safe for frail patients with cSFT, providing comparable outcomes to standard fractionation. The reduced treatment burden of HF may benefit patients with limited performance status. Further research is needed to guide optimal treatment approaches for this unique population.</p>","PeriodicalId":19497,"journal":{"name":"Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543847","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Central nervous system solitary fibrous tumors (cSFTs) are rare, accounting for less than 1% of CNS tumors. Treatment guidelines are limited, especially for frail or elderly patients. Gross total resection followed by radiotherapy is recommended for higher-grade cases, but the role of hypofractionated radiotherapy (HF) versus standard fractionation (SF) in this population remains unclear. This study evaluates outcomes of HF compared to SF in frail patients with cSFT.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of 51 frail patients (age >65, KPS <80) with cSFT treated from 2005-2023 was performed. Patients received either HF (21 patients) or SF (30 patients). Data extracted included demographics, tumor characteristics, surgical outcomes, radiation regimens, and oncologic outcomes. Descriptive and survival analyses were conducted using Kaplan-Meier methods, with multivariable analysis via Cox regression models to assess factors influencing local control and overall survival.

Results: The median follow-up was 19 months (11-55 months). HF regimens varied from 35-48 Gy in 10-15 fractions, while SF was predominantly 54-60 Gy in 28-30 fractions. Local control was achieved in 76.2% of HF and 80% of SF patients (p=0.154). No statistical difference in overall survival was observed between HF (18 months) and SF (18 months, p=0.54). Higher tumor grade (HR=3.5, p=0.021) and incomplete resection (HR=0.72, p=0.035) negatively impacted local control. KPS ≤50 was associated with reduced survival (HR=2.3, p=0.035).

Conclusions: Hypofractionated radiotherapy appears feasible and safe for frail patients with cSFT, providing comparable outcomes to standard fractionation. The reduced treatment burden of HF may benefit patients with limited performance status. Further research is needed to guide optimal treatment approaches for this unique population.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oncology
Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
76
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Although laboratory and clinical cancer research need to be closely linked, observations at the basic level often remain removed from medical applications. This journal works to accelerate the translation of experimental results into the clinic, and back again into the laboratory for further investigation. The fundamental purpose of this effort is to advance clinically-relevant knowledge of cancer, and improve the outcome of prevention, diagnosis and treatment of malignant disease. The journal publishes significant clinical studies from cancer programs around the world, along with important translational laboratory findings, mini-reviews (invited and submitted) and in-depth discussions of evolving and controversial topics in the oncology arena. A unique feature of the journal is a new section which focuses on rapid peer-review and subsequent publication of short reports of phase 1 and phase 2 clinical cancer trials, with a goal of insuring that high-quality clinical cancer research quickly enters the public domain, regardless of the trial’s ultimate conclusions regarding efficacy or toxicity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信