A metric-based image-formation model explains the improvement in subjective refraction using temporal defocus waves.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Victor Rodriguez-Lopez, Carlos Dorronsoro, Alberto de Castro
{"title":"A metric-based image-formation model explains the improvement in subjective refraction using temporal defocus waves.","authors":"Victor Rodriguez-Lopez, Carlos Dorronsoro, Alberto de Castro","doi":"10.1097/OPX.0000000000002239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Significance: </strong>Direct subjective refraction (DSR) is a novel method for refractive error measurements that uses temporal changes in defocus and a flicker minimization task. The computational models developed here are a framework for improving this clinical method.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to model the measurement of refractive error with the DSR method, which uses rapid changes in optical power and a bichromatic (red/blue) stimulus.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The polychromatic point spread function of the eye was used to simulate the retinal image projected in DSR method, and an image quality (IQ) metric was defined based on the spatial frequencies of the retinal image. Three tasks were modeled: blur minimization (BM), monochromatic flicker minimization (MFM), and polychromatic flicker minimization or DSR. A metric was defined for each task and studied through focus in a ±3-D range. Whereas BM was modeled using only the IQ of the projected images, MFM and DSR metrics were a function of the IQ of the average retinal image and a metric to quantify the similarity (flicker) in the image. The width of the through-focus peak was used to compare between tasks, and different values of pupil size and spherical aberration were studied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The through-focus 90% peak width was 0.48, 0.16, and 0.19 D for BM, MFM, and DSR tasks, respectively, which agreed well with previous experimental data. The 90% peak width increased for small pupils and with increasing values of spherical aberration in BM and MFM, but it remained relatively constant in DSR model.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The developed models explained previous experimental findings that reported a higher repeatability of the DSR compared with the traditional refraction method.</p>","PeriodicalId":19649,"journal":{"name":"Optometry and Vision Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Optometry and Vision Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000002239","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Significance: Direct subjective refraction (DSR) is a novel method for refractive error measurements that uses temporal changes in defocus and a flicker minimization task. The computational models developed here are a framework for improving this clinical method.

Purpose: This study aimed to model the measurement of refractive error with the DSR method, which uses rapid changes in optical power and a bichromatic (red/blue) stimulus.

Methods: The polychromatic point spread function of the eye was used to simulate the retinal image projected in DSR method, and an image quality (IQ) metric was defined based on the spatial frequencies of the retinal image. Three tasks were modeled: blur minimization (BM), monochromatic flicker minimization (MFM), and polychromatic flicker minimization or DSR. A metric was defined for each task and studied through focus in a ±3-D range. Whereas BM was modeled using only the IQ of the projected images, MFM and DSR metrics were a function of the IQ of the average retinal image and a metric to quantify the similarity (flicker) in the image. The width of the through-focus peak was used to compare between tasks, and different values of pupil size and spherical aberration were studied.

Results: The through-focus 90% peak width was 0.48, 0.16, and 0.19 D for BM, MFM, and DSR tasks, respectively, which agreed well with previous experimental data. The 90% peak width increased for small pupils and with increasing values of spherical aberration in BM and MFM, but it remained relatively constant in DSR model.

Conclusions: The developed models explained previous experimental findings that reported a higher repeatability of the DSR compared with the traditional refraction method.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Optometry and Vision Science
Optometry and Vision Science 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
7.10%
发文量
210
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Optometry and Vision Science is the monthly peer-reviewed scientific publication of the American Academy of Optometry, publishing original research since 1924. Optometry and Vision Science is an internationally recognized source for education and information on current discoveries in optometry, physiological optics, vision science, and related fields. The journal considers original contributions that advance clinical practice, vision science, and public health. Authors should remember that the journal reaches readers worldwide and their submissions should be relevant and of interest to a broad audience. Topical priorities include, but are not limited to: clinical and laboratory research, evidence-based reviews, contact lenses, ocular growth and refractive error development, eye movements, visual function and perception, biology of the eye and ocular disease, epidemiology and public health, biomedical optics and instrumentation, novel and important clinical observations and treatments, and optometric education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信