A randomized controlled trial to evaluate a novel dual laser therapy for vulvar lichen sclerosus: exploratory study assessing the impact of menopausal status.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Irena Zivanovic, Marianne Gamper, Debra Fesslmeier, Helena Bischofberger, Volker Viereck
{"title":"A randomized controlled trial to evaluate a novel dual laser therapy for vulvar lichen sclerosus: exploratory study assessing the impact of menopausal status.","authors":"Irena Zivanovic, Marianne Gamper, Debra Fesslmeier, Helena Bischofberger, Volker Viereck","doi":"10.1097/GME.0000000000002478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>A randomized controlled trial showed that Neodymium:YAG/Erbium:YAG laser therapy was safe and significantly improved clinical outcomes and subjective symptoms of vulvar lichen sclerosus (LS). Most improvements were similar to those after the recommended first-line therapy with topical steroid. In this exploratory study, we wanted to analyze the impact of menopausal status on perception and treatment outcome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty-six women with clinical lichen sclerosus were assigned to the laser or the steroid arm (2:1). Participants of the laser arm received four laser treatments with a follow-up of 6 months after treatment initiation. Clinical objective (LS score) and subjective outcomes (vulvovaginal symptoms questionnaire [VSQ], symptom visual analogue scale [VAS] score, patient satisfaction) were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen of the 66 study participants were premenopausal, 47 postmenopausal. At baseline, premenopausal women were significantly younger (39.4 vs 67.4 yr, P < 0.001), only a few applied local estrogen (16% vs 74%, P < 0.001), and their VSQ score was higher (9.58 vs 7.32, P = 0.015) indicating more severe vulvovaginal symptoms. Laser therapy objectively led to similar clinical improvements for pre- and postmenopausal women (-2.62 vs -2.23, P = 0.437), but subjectively to a significantly higher improvement of the VSQ score in postmenopausal women (-4.13 vs -1.08, P = 0.005). Postmenopausal women were more satisfied with laser therapy than premenopausal women (71% vs 46%, P = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to premenopausal women, postmenopausal women experienced a lower subjective burden of the disease and a better subjective improvement after laser therapy. Perceptions and expectations are age-dependent and should be considered when treating women with lichen sclerosus.</p>","PeriodicalId":18435,"journal":{"name":"Menopause: The Journal of The North American Menopause Society","volume":"32 3","pages":"228-233"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Menopause: The Journal of The North American Menopause Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GME.0000000000002478","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: A randomized controlled trial showed that Neodymium:YAG/Erbium:YAG laser therapy was safe and significantly improved clinical outcomes and subjective symptoms of vulvar lichen sclerosus (LS). Most improvements were similar to those after the recommended first-line therapy with topical steroid. In this exploratory study, we wanted to analyze the impact of menopausal status on perception and treatment outcome.

Methods: Sixty-six women with clinical lichen sclerosus were assigned to the laser or the steroid arm (2:1). Participants of the laser arm received four laser treatments with a follow-up of 6 months after treatment initiation. Clinical objective (LS score) and subjective outcomes (vulvovaginal symptoms questionnaire [VSQ], symptom visual analogue scale [VAS] score, patient satisfaction) were evaluated.

Results: Nineteen of the 66 study participants were premenopausal, 47 postmenopausal. At baseline, premenopausal women were significantly younger (39.4 vs 67.4 yr, P < 0.001), only a few applied local estrogen (16% vs 74%, P < 0.001), and their VSQ score was higher (9.58 vs 7.32, P = 0.015) indicating more severe vulvovaginal symptoms. Laser therapy objectively led to similar clinical improvements for pre- and postmenopausal women (-2.62 vs -2.23, P = 0.437), but subjectively to a significantly higher improvement of the VSQ score in postmenopausal women (-4.13 vs -1.08, P = 0.005). Postmenopausal women were more satisfied with laser therapy than premenopausal women (71% vs 46%, P = 0.002).

Conclusion: Compared to premenopausal women, postmenopausal women experienced a lower subjective burden of the disease and a better subjective improvement after laser therapy. Perceptions and expectations are age-dependent and should be considered when treating women with lichen sclerosus.

一项评估新型双激光治疗外阴硬化苔藓的随机对照试验:评估绝经状态影响的探索性研究。
目的:一项随机对照试验表明,钕:YAG/铒:YAG激光治疗外阴硬化苔藓(LS)是安全的,可显著改善临床结果和主观症状。大多数改善与推荐的局部类固醇一线治疗后的改善相似。在这项探索性研究中,我们想分析绝经状态对认知和治疗结果的影响。方法:66例临床硬化性地衣患者分为激光组和类固醇组(2:1)。激光组的参与者接受了四次激光治疗,治疗开始后随访6个月。对临床客观结果(LS评分)和主观结果(外阴阴道症状问卷(VSQ)、症状视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、患者满意度)进行评价。结果:66名研究参与者中有19名绝经前,47名绝经后。在基线时,绝经前妇女明显更年轻(39.4 vs 67.4岁,P < 0.001),只有少数使用局部雌激素(16% vs 74%, P < 0.001),她们的VSQ评分更高(9.58 vs 7.32, P = 0.015),表明外阴阴道症状更严重。激光治疗客观上导致绝经前和绝经后妇女的临床改善相似(-2.62 vs -2.23, P = 0.437),但主观上绝经后妇女VSQ评分的改善明显更高(-4.13 vs -1.08, P = 0.005)。绝经后妇女对激光治疗的满意度高于绝经前妇女(71%对46%,P = 0.002)。结论:与绝经前妇女相比,绝经后妇女的疾病主观负担较低,激光治疗后的主观改善较好。观念和期望与年龄有关,在治疗患有硬化性地衣的妇女时应予以考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
330
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ​Menopause, published monthly, provides a forum for new research, applied basic science, and clinical guidelines on all aspects of menopause. The scope and usefulness of the journal extend beyond gynecology, encompassing many varied biomedical areas, including internal medicine, family practice, medical subspecialties such as cardiology and geriatrics, epidemiology, pathology, sociology, psychology, anthropology, and pharmacology. This forum is essential to help integrate these areas, highlight needs for future research, and enhance health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信