A Protocol to Establish Exercise Intensity Domains for Aerobic Exercise Training in Coronary Artery Disease.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Robin Faricier, Randi R Keltz, Tim Hartley, Nathan Mackay, Juan M Murias, Ashlay A Huitema, Robert S McKelvie, Neville G Suskin, Daniel A Keir
{"title":"A Protocol to Establish Exercise Intensity Domains for Aerobic Exercise Training in Coronary Artery Disease.","authors":"Robin Faricier, Randi R Keltz, Tim Hartley, Nathan Mackay, Juan M Murias, Ashlay A Huitema, Robert S McKelvie, Neville G Suskin, Daniel A Keir","doi":"10.1249/MSS.0000000000003684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Methods: </strong>The SRS protocol included in series: 6-min of cycling at 25-40 W, a ramp-incremental test until task failure (5-15 W·min-1), and, after recovery, 12-min of cycling at ~50-60% of peak ramp PO. On separate days, patients performed three domain-specific constant-PO exercises at 80%θLT (moderate-intensity, MOD), 70% of the difference between θLT and RCP (heavy-intensity, HVY), and 115%RCP (severe-intensity, SEV). Measured V̇O2 for: MOD and HVY were compared to those predicted using either SRS-corrected or uncorrected approaches; and, for SEV, were compared to peak ramp V̇O2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The POs for MOD, HVY, and SEV were 53 ± 27 W, 96 ± 50 W, and 116 ± 56 W, respectively, eliciting V̇O2 of 1012 ± 362 mL·min-1, 1541 ± 638 mL·min-1, and 1944 ± 744 mL·min-1. The SRS-corrected predictions did not differ from measured V̇O2 for MOD (-25 ± 61 mL·min-1; p = 0.201) or HVY (-40 ± 89 mL·min-1; p = 0.208), whereas uncorrected predictions underestimated V̇O2 by -128 ± 72 mL·min-1 (p = 0.002) and -199 ± 99 mL·min-1 (p = 0.001) in MOD and HVY, respectively. Peak V̇O2 from SEV did not differ from the ramp (1906 ± 766 mL·min-1; p = 0.759).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In CAD, the V̇O2-to-PO relationship from incremental exercise must be corrected to prescribe constant intensity training. The SRS protocol is an accurate approach to ensure prescriptive accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":18426,"journal":{"name":"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000003684","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Methods: The SRS protocol included in series: 6-min of cycling at 25-40 W, a ramp-incremental test until task failure (5-15 W·min-1), and, after recovery, 12-min of cycling at ~50-60% of peak ramp PO. On separate days, patients performed three domain-specific constant-PO exercises at 80%θLT (moderate-intensity, MOD), 70% of the difference between θLT and RCP (heavy-intensity, HVY), and 115%RCP (severe-intensity, SEV). Measured V̇O2 for: MOD and HVY were compared to those predicted using either SRS-corrected or uncorrected approaches; and, for SEV, were compared to peak ramp V̇O2.

Results: The POs for MOD, HVY, and SEV were 53 ± 27 W, 96 ± 50 W, and 116 ± 56 W, respectively, eliciting V̇O2 of 1012 ± 362 mL·min-1, 1541 ± 638 mL·min-1, and 1944 ± 744 mL·min-1. The SRS-corrected predictions did not differ from measured V̇O2 for MOD (-25 ± 61 mL·min-1; p = 0.201) or HVY (-40 ± 89 mL·min-1; p = 0.208), whereas uncorrected predictions underestimated V̇O2 by -128 ± 72 mL·min-1 (p = 0.002) and -199 ± 99 mL·min-1 (p = 0.001) in MOD and HVY, respectively. Peak V̇O2 from SEV did not differ from the ramp (1906 ± 766 mL·min-1; p = 0.759).

Conclusions: In CAD, the V̇O2-to-PO relationship from incremental exercise must be corrected to prescribe constant intensity training. The SRS protocol is an accurate approach to ensure prescriptive accuracy.

建立冠状动脉疾病有氧运动训练的运动强度域的方案。
方法:SRS方案包括:在25-40 W下循环6分钟,斜坡增量测试直到任务失败(5-15 W·min-1),恢复后,在斜坡峰值PO的~50-60%下循环12分钟。在不同的天,患者以80%θLT(中等强度,MOD), 70% θLT与RCP(高强度,HVY)之间的差异和115%RCP(严重强度,SEV)进行三种特定领域的恒定po运动。比较使用srs校正或未校正方法预测的MOD和HVY的测量V²O2;对于SEV,将其与峰值斜坡V (O2)进行比较。结果:MOD、HVY和SEV的POs分别为53±27 W、96±50 W和116±56 W,诱导的V (O2)为1012±362 mL·min-1、1541±638 mL·min-1和1944±744 mL·min-1。srs校正后的预测结果与MOD的测量值无差异(-25±61 mL·min-1;p = 0.201)或HVY(-40±89 mL·min-1;p = 0.208),而在MOD和HVY中,未经校正的预测分别低估了-128±72 mL·min-1 (p = 0.002)和-199±99 mL·min-1 (p = 0.001)。SEV的峰值V (O2)与斜坡无差异(1906±766 mL·min-1;P = 0.759)。结论:在CAD中,必须纠正增量运动引起的vo2 - po关系,以规定恒定强度的训练。SRS协议是一种确保规范准确性的精确方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
4.90%
发文量
2568
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise® features original investigations, clinical studies, and comprehensive reviews on current topics in sports medicine and exercise science. With this leading multidisciplinary journal, exercise physiologists, physiatrists, physical therapists, team physicians, and athletic trainers get a vital exchange of information from basic and applied science, medicine, education, and allied health fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信