Robin Faricier, Randi R Keltz, Tim Hartley, Nathan Mackay, Juan M Murias, Ashlay A Huitema, Robert S McKelvie, Neville G Suskin, Daniel A Keir
{"title":"A Protocol to Establish Exercise Intensity Domains for Aerobic Exercise Training in Coronary Artery Disease.","authors":"Robin Faricier, Randi R Keltz, Tim Hartley, Nathan Mackay, Juan M Murias, Ashlay A Huitema, Robert S McKelvie, Neville G Suskin, Daniel A Keir","doi":"10.1249/MSS.0000000000003684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction/purpose: </strong>The oxygen uptake (V̇O 2 )-power output (PO) relationship from incremental exercise needs to be adjusted to accurately prescribe constant-intensity exercise training. We assessed the accuracy of a \"step-ramp-step\" (SRS) protocol for prescribing constant PO exercise within moderate-intensity (below estimated lactate threshold, θ LT ), heavy-intensity (between θ LT and respiratory compensation point, RCP), and severe-intensity (above RCP) domains in 14 patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The SRS protocol included the following: 6 min of cycling at 25-40 W, a ramp-incremental test until task failure (5-15 W · min -1 ), and, after a 20 min recovery, 12 min of cycling at ~50%-60% of peak ramp PO. On separate days, patients performed three domain-specific constant PO exercises at 80% θ LT (moderate intensity [MOD]), 70% of the difference between θ LT and RCP (heavy intensity [HVY]), and 115% RCP (severe intensity [SEV]). Measured V̇O 2 values for MOD and HVY were compared with those predicted using either SRS-corrected or uncorrected approaches and, for SEV, were compared with peak ramp V̇O 2 .</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PO values for MOD, HVY, and SEV were 53 ± 27, 96 ± 50, and 116 ± 56 W, respectively, eliciting V̇O 2 of 1012 ± 362, 1541 ± 638, and 1944 ± 744 mL·min -1 . The SRS-corrected predictions did not differ from measured V̇O 2 for MOD (-25 ± 61 mL·min -1 ; P = 0.201) or HVY (-40 ± 89 mL·min -1 ; P = 0.208), whereas uncorrected predictions underestimated V̇O 2 by -128 ± 72 mL·min -1 ( P = 0.002) and -199 ± 99 mL·min -1 ( P = 0.001) in MOD and HVY, respectively. Peak V̇O 2 from SEV did not differ from the ramp (1906 ± 766 mL·min -1 ; P = 0.759).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In CAD, the V̇O 2 -PO relationship from incremental exercise must be corrected to prescribe constant-intensity training. The SRS protocol is an accurate approach to ensure prescriptive accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":18426,"journal":{"name":"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise","volume":" ","pages":"1593-1602"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000003684","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction/purpose: The oxygen uptake (V̇O 2 )-power output (PO) relationship from incremental exercise needs to be adjusted to accurately prescribe constant-intensity exercise training. We assessed the accuracy of a "step-ramp-step" (SRS) protocol for prescribing constant PO exercise within moderate-intensity (below estimated lactate threshold, θ LT ), heavy-intensity (between θ LT and respiratory compensation point, RCP), and severe-intensity (above RCP) domains in 14 patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).
Methods: The SRS protocol included the following: 6 min of cycling at 25-40 W, a ramp-incremental test until task failure (5-15 W · min -1 ), and, after a 20 min recovery, 12 min of cycling at ~50%-60% of peak ramp PO. On separate days, patients performed three domain-specific constant PO exercises at 80% θ LT (moderate intensity [MOD]), 70% of the difference between θ LT and RCP (heavy intensity [HVY]), and 115% RCP (severe intensity [SEV]). Measured V̇O 2 values for MOD and HVY were compared with those predicted using either SRS-corrected or uncorrected approaches and, for SEV, were compared with peak ramp V̇O 2 .
Results: The PO values for MOD, HVY, and SEV were 53 ± 27, 96 ± 50, and 116 ± 56 W, respectively, eliciting V̇O 2 of 1012 ± 362, 1541 ± 638, and 1944 ± 744 mL·min -1 . The SRS-corrected predictions did not differ from measured V̇O 2 for MOD (-25 ± 61 mL·min -1 ; P = 0.201) or HVY (-40 ± 89 mL·min -1 ; P = 0.208), whereas uncorrected predictions underestimated V̇O 2 by -128 ± 72 mL·min -1 ( P = 0.002) and -199 ± 99 mL·min -1 ( P = 0.001) in MOD and HVY, respectively. Peak V̇O 2 from SEV did not differ from the ramp (1906 ± 766 mL·min -1 ; P = 0.759).
Conclusions: In CAD, the V̇O 2 -PO relationship from incremental exercise must be corrected to prescribe constant-intensity training. The SRS protocol is an accurate approach to ensure prescriptive accuracy.
期刊介绍:
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise® features original investigations, clinical studies, and comprehensive reviews on current topics in sports medicine and exercise science. With this leading multidisciplinary journal, exercise physiologists, physiatrists, physical therapists, team physicians, and athletic trainers get a vital exchange of information from basic and applied science, medicine, education, and allied health fields.