Intimate Partner Violence Against Men in Germany-A Study on Prevalence, Victim-Offender Overlap, and the Role of Parental Violence.

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Jonas Schemmel, Dario Maciey, Laura-Romina Goede
{"title":"Intimate Partner Violence Against Men in Germany-A Study on Prevalence, Victim-Offender Overlap, and the Role of Parental Violence.","authors":"Jonas Schemmel, Dario Maciey, Laura-Romina Goede","doi":"10.1177/08862605251321003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We present data on intimate partner violence (IPV) victimization, perpetration, and victim-offender overlap in Germany, focusing on the impact of parental violence. We collected a sample using a register-based procedure where 183 randomly selected municipalities provided the addresses of 12,000 randomly selected men aged 18 to 69. Out of these men, a total N of 1,209 answered questions on their experiences with IPV and parental violence as children. In our sample, lifetime prevalences of IPV victimization ranged from 5.4% (sexual violence) to 39.8% (psychological violence), and 12-month prevalences ranged from 2.8% (digital violence) to 25.1% (coercive control). The sample's corresponding lifetime prevalences of IPV perpetration ranged between 2.3% (digital violence) and 33.4% (psychological violence). Overall, there was a victim-offender overlap of 39.5%, which was particularly pronounced for non-physical IPV (psychological: 23.6%; coercive control: 20.3%). Offending only was most frequently reported for coercive control (18.4%). Across the different IPV types, victimization was consistently associated with verbal parental violence in childhood. Being victimized by verbal parental violence and witnessing violence between parents were predictive of later being involved in psychological violence as a victim-only or as both a victim and offender. Being a victim of physical parental violence in childhood more than doubled the odds of being a victim-offender of physical IPV, and increased the odds of becoming an offender-only of sexual IPV. These findings suggest that distinguishing clearly between victim and offender is often challenging in IPV research and reaffirm the well-established link between parental violence and IPV in the context of IPV against men.</p>","PeriodicalId":16289,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interpersonal Violence","volume":" ","pages":"8862605251321003"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interpersonal Violence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605251321003","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We present data on intimate partner violence (IPV) victimization, perpetration, and victim-offender overlap in Germany, focusing on the impact of parental violence. We collected a sample using a register-based procedure where 183 randomly selected municipalities provided the addresses of 12,000 randomly selected men aged 18 to 69. Out of these men, a total N of 1,209 answered questions on their experiences with IPV and parental violence as children. In our sample, lifetime prevalences of IPV victimization ranged from 5.4% (sexual violence) to 39.8% (psychological violence), and 12-month prevalences ranged from 2.8% (digital violence) to 25.1% (coercive control). The sample's corresponding lifetime prevalences of IPV perpetration ranged between 2.3% (digital violence) and 33.4% (psychological violence). Overall, there was a victim-offender overlap of 39.5%, which was particularly pronounced for non-physical IPV (psychological: 23.6%; coercive control: 20.3%). Offending only was most frequently reported for coercive control (18.4%). Across the different IPV types, victimization was consistently associated with verbal parental violence in childhood. Being victimized by verbal parental violence and witnessing violence between parents were predictive of later being involved in psychological violence as a victim-only or as both a victim and offender. Being a victim of physical parental violence in childhood more than doubled the odds of being a victim-offender of physical IPV, and increased the odds of becoming an offender-only of sexual IPV. These findings suggest that distinguishing clearly between victim and offender is often challenging in IPV research and reaffirm the well-established link between parental violence and IPV in the context of IPV against men.

德国男性的亲密伴侣暴力——关于流行、受害者-罪犯重叠和父母暴力作用的研究。
我们提供了关于德国亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)受害、犯罪和受害者-犯罪者重叠的数据,重点关注父母暴力的影响。我们使用基于登记册的程序收集样本,其中183个随机选择的城市提供了12,000名年龄在18至69岁之间的随机选择的男性的地址。在这些男性中,共有1209人回答了关于他们小时候遭受IPV和父母暴力的经历的问题。在我们的样本中,IPV受害的终生患病率从5.4%(性暴力)到39.8%(心理暴力)不等,12个月患病率从2.8%(数字暴力)到25.1%(强制控制)不等。样本中相应的IPV终生患病率在2.3%(数字暴力)和33.4%(心理暴力)之间。总体而言,受害者和罪犯的重叠率为39.5%,这在非身体上的IPV中尤为明显(心理上的:23.6%;强制控制:20.3%)。最常报告的犯罪行为是强制控制(18.4%)。在不同的IPV类型中,受害始终与童年时期父母的言语暴力有关。成为父母言语暴力的受害者,目睹父母之间的暴力,预示着以后会成为心理暴力的唯一受害者,或者既是受害者又是施暴者。童年时期受到父母身体暴力的受害者,成为身体暴力的受害者和施暴者的几率增加了一倍以上,并增加了成为性暴力的犯罪者的几率。这些发现表明,在IPV研究中,明确区分受害者和罪犯往往具有挑战性,并重申了在针对男性的IPV背景下,父母暴力与IPV之间的既定联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
12.00%
发文量
375
期刊介绍: The Journal of Interpersonal Violence is devoted to the study and treatment of victims and perpetrators of interpersonal violence. It provides a forum of discussion of the concerns and activities of professionals and researchers working in domestic violence, child sexual abuse, rape and sexual assault, physical child abuse, and violent crime. With its dual focus on victims and victimizers, the journal will publish material that addresses the causes, effects, treatment, and prevention of all types of violence. JIV only publishes reports on individual studies in which the scientific method is applied to the study of some aspect of interpersonal violence. Research may use qualitative or quantitative methods. JIV does not publish reviews of research, individual case studies, or the conceptual analysis of some aspect of interpersonal violence. Outcome data for program or intervention evaluations must include a comparison or control group.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信