Effects of intranasal maropitant on clinical signs of naturally acquired upper respiratory disease in shelter cats.

IF 1.9 2区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
John Parncutt, Lynelle R Johnson, Supatsak Subharat, Bronwyn Oke, Kate E Hill
{"title":"Effects of intranasal maropitant on clinical signs of naturally acquired upper respiratory disease in shelter cats.","authors":"John Parncutt, Lynelle R Johnson, Supatsak Subharat, Bronwyn Oke, Kate E Hill","doi":"10.1177/1098612X241309826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that intranasally administered maropitant citrate would reduce the severity of clinical signs of feline upper respiratory disease (FURD) in shelter cats with naturally acquired disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Shelter cats with clinical signs of FURD were randomly assigned to receive either intranasal maropitant diluted in saline (maropitant citrate 10 mg/ml q12h, diluted 1:10 with sterile 0.9% saline) or intranasal 0.9% saline q12h for 7 days. Clinical disease severity was measured at entry into the study and again after completion of 7 days of treatment using a visual analogue scale to assess four separate clinical signs: conjunctivitis, blepharospasm, ocular discharge and nasal discharge. Total disease severity was also calculated. Cats received other medications for FURD as per standard shelter protocols, and all investigators were masked to group assignments. A Mann-Whitney U-test was performed to compare the clinical improvement score (CIS) between the treatment and control groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 34 cats in the maropitant treatment group; 27 cats served as placebo controls. Groups did not differ in age, sex distribution, nature of disease, administration of other medications for FURD or baseline clinical disease severity. There was no significant difference in CIS between the maropitant treatment and control groups for conjunctivitis, blepharospasm, ocular discharge, nasal discharge or total disease severity after 7 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This study found no significant difference in outcomes for cats with FURD when treated with intranasal maropitant compared with treatment with intranasal saline. Further investigations would be required before intranasal maropitant could be recommended as the standard of care for FURD.</p>","PeriodicalId":15851,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery","volume":"27 2","pages":"1098612X241309826"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11863213/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1098612X241309826","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that intranasally administered maropitant citrate would reduce the severity of clinical signs of feline upper respiratory disease (FURD) in shelter cats with naturally acquired disease.

Methods: Shelter cats with clinical signs of FURD were randomly assigned to receive either intranasal maropitant diluted in saline (maropitant citrate 10 mg/ml q12h, diluted 1:10 with sterile 0.9% saline) or intranasal 0.9% saline q12h for 7 days. Clinical disease severity was measured at entry into the study and again after completion of 7 days of treatment using a visual analogue scale to assess four separate clinical signs: conjunctivitis, blepharospasm, ocular discharge and nasal discharge. Total disease severity was also calculated. Cats received other medications for FURD as per standard shelter protocols, and all investigators were masked to group assignments. A Mann-Whitney U-test was performed to compare the clinical improvement score (CIS) between the treatment and control groups.

Results: There were 34 cats in the maropitant treatment group; 27 cats served as placebo controls. Groups did not differ in age, sex distribution, nature of disease, administration of other medications for FURD or baseline clinical disease severity. There was no significant difference in CIS between the maropitant treatment and control groups for conjunctivitis, blepharospasm, ocular discharge, nasal discharge or total disease severity after 7 days.

Conclusions and relevance: This study found no significant difference in outcomes for cats with FURD when treated with intranasal maropitant compared with treatment with intranasal saline. Further investigations would be required before intranasal maropitant could be recommended as the standard of care for FURD.

鼻内马洛匹坦对收容所猫自然获得性上呼吸道疾病临床症状的影响。
目的:本研究的目的是验证一种假设,即鼻内给药枸橼酸马洛匹坦可以降低患有自然获得性疾病的收容所猫上呼吸道疾病(FURD)临床症状的严重程度。方法:将有fur临床症状的收容所猫随机分为两组,一组服用经鼻稀释的盐酸马洛匹坦(柠檬酸马洛匹坦10 mg/ml q12h,用无菌0.9%生理盐水1:10稀释),另一组服用经鼻稀释的0.9%生理盐水q12h,连续7天。临床疾病严重程度在进入研究时进行测量,并在7天治疗结束后再次使用视觉模拟量表评估四种独立的临床症状:结膜炎、眼睑痉挛、眼分泌物和鼻分泌物。还计算了总疾病严重程度。根据标准收容所协议,猫接受了其他治疗FURD的药物治疗,所有调查人员都被分组分配。采用Mann-Whitney u检验比较治疗组和对照组的临床改善评分(CIS)。结果:马洛匹坦治疗组34只猫;27只猫作为安慰剂对照组。各组在年龄、性别分布、疾病性质、治疗FURD的其他药物的使用或基线临床疾病严重程度方面没有差异。马洛匹坦治疗组与对照组结膜炎、眼睑痉挛、眼分泌物、鼻分泌物或总疾病严重程度的CIS在7天后无显著差异。结论和相关性:本研究发现,与鼻内盐水治疗相比,鼻内马洛匹坦治疗猫咪FURD的结果没有显著差异。在推荐使用鼻用马洛匹坦作为fd的标准治疗之前,还需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
17.60%
发文量
254
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: JFMS is an international, peer-reviewed journal aimed at both practitioners and researchers with an interest in the clinical veterinary healthcare of domestic cats. The journal is published monthly in two formats: ‘Classic’ editions containing high-quality original papers on all aspects of feline medicine and surgery, including basic research relevant to clinical practice; and dedicated ‘Clinical Practice’ editions primarily containing opinionated review articles providing state-of-the-art information for feline clinicians, along with other relevant articles such as consensus guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信