A framework to standardize gait study protocols in Parkinson's disease.

IF 4 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Journal of Parkinson's disease Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-25 DOI:10.1177/1877718X241305626
Martina Mancini, Jeffrey M Hausdorff, Elisa Pelosin, Paolo Bonato, Richard Camicioli, Terry D Ellis, Jochen Klucken, Larry Gifford, Alfonso Fasano, Alice Nieuwboer, Catherine Kopil, Katharina Klapper, Leslie Kirsch, David T Dexter, Rosie Fuest, Vicki Miller, Angelica Asis, Martijn Ltm Müller, Diane Stephenson, Anat Mirelman
{"title":"A framework to standardize gait study protocols in Parkinson's disease.","authors":"Martina Mancini, Jeffrey M Hausdorff, Elisa Pelosin, Paolo Bonato, Richard Camicioli, Terry D Ellis, Jochen Klucken, Larry Gifford, Alfonso Fasano, Alice Nieuwboer, Catherine Kopil, Katharina Klapper, Leslie Kirsch, David T Dexter, Rosie Fuest, Vicki Miller, Angelica Asis, Martijn Ltm Müller, Diane Stephenson, Anat Mirelman","doi":"10.1177/1877718X241305626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundResearch over the past twenty years has shown that gait outcomes have a high sensitivity for diagnosing Parkinson's disease (PD), for detecting the effects of interventions, and for monitoring disease progression, even in early disease. However, the lack of standardization in protocols and reported gait measures is impeding data aggregation across study sites and contributes to heterogeneity in the results, thus limiting the adoption of gait outcomes in clinical trials.ObjectiveTo provide recommendations for a minimum set of gait measures to be adopted in projects evaluating people with PD to enhance standardization across the field.MethodsThe Gait Advisors Leading Outcomes for Parkinson's (GALOP) committee is an advisory committee for the MJFF. Based on a five-step approach, GALOP generated recommendations for standardizing protocols that assess quantitative gait measures, following expert consensus on best practices.ResultsBuilt on the literature and consensus amongst experts, we recommend a minimum set of meta-data to accompany gait protocols and a minimum gait assessment protocol to be performed at a comfortable speed. Suggestions on challenging testing are provided.ConclusionsTo support and empower the scientific community, we have generated recommendations to collect and share gait data gathered from people with PD using an open data repository. Standardizing gait protocols and outcomes in PD has the potential of accelerating research and clinical trials, harmonizing protocols across study sites, fostering collaborations, and in the long run, improving patient care and quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":16660,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Parkinson's disease","volume":" ","pages":"129-139"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Parkinson's disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1877718X241305626","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundResearch over the past twenty years has shown that gait outcomes have a high sensitivity for diagnosing Parkinson's disease (PD), for detecting the effects of interventions, and for monitoring disease progression, even in early disease. However, the lack of standardization in protocols and reported gait measures is impeding data aggregation across study sites and contributes to heterogeneity in the results, thus limiting the adoption of gait outcomes in clinical trials.ObjectiveTo provide recommendations for a minimum set of gait measures to be adopted in projects evaluating people with PD to enhance standardization across the field.MethodsThe Gait Advisors Leading Outcomes for Parkinson's (GALOP) committee is an advisory committee for the MJFF. Based on a five-step approach, GALOP generated recommendations for standardizing protocols that assess quantitative gait measures, following expert consensus on best practices.ResultsBuilt on the literature and consensus amongst experts, we recommend a minimum set of meta-data to accompany gait protocols and a minimum gait assessment protocol to be performed at a comfortable speed. Suggestions on challenging testing are provided.ConclusionsTo support and empower the scientific community, we have generated recommendations to collect and share gait data gathered from people with PD using an open data repository. Standardizing gait protocols and outcomes in PD has the potential of accelerating research and clinical trials, harmonizing protocols across study sites, fostering collaborations, and in the long run, improving patient care and quality of life.

一个规范帕金森病步态研究方案的框架。
背景:过去二十年的研究表明,步态结果对诊断帕金森病(PD)、检测干预措施的效果和监测疾病进展具有很高的敏感性,甚至在早期疾病中也是如此。然而,缺乏标准化的方案和报告的步态测量妨碍了研究地点的数据汇总,并导致结果的异质性,从而限制了临床试验中步态结果的采用。目的:为PD患者评估项目中采用的最小步态测量提供建议,以提高整个领域的标准化。方法:步态顾问帕金森病领先预后(GALOP)委员会是MJFF的咨询委员会。基于五步方法,GALOP根据专家对最佳实践的共识,为评估定量步态测量的标准化协议提出了建议。结果:基于文献和专家之间的共识,我们推荐一组最小的元数据来伴随步态协议和最小的步态评估协议,以舒适的速度执行。对具有挑战性的测试提出了建议。结论:为了支持和授权科学界,我们提出了使用开放数据存储库收集和共享PD患者步态数据的建议。标准化PD的步态方案和结果有可能加速研究和临床试验,协调各研究地点的方案,促进合作,并从长远来看,改善患者护理和生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
5.80%
发文量
338
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Parkinson''s Disease (JPD) publishes original research in basic science, translational research and clinical medicine in Parkinson’s disease in cooperation with the Journal of Alzheimer''s Disease. It features a first class Editorial Board and provides rigorous peer review and rapid online publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信