Evaluation of Angiotensin II in Patients With Catecholamine-Resistant Vasodilatory Shock Requiring Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy (ANGEL CRRT).

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Meaghan A Rettele, Adham M Mohamed, Timothy P Berry, Sydney S Wilson, Julie A Welge, Shelby S Shemanski, Rebecca L Shriver, Shais S Jallu, Michelle M Haines, Aaron J Douglas, Majdi S Hamarshi, Jonathan B Kozinn
{"title":"Evaluation of Angiotensin II in Patients With Catecholamine-Resistant Vasodilatory Shock Requiring Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy (ANGEL CRRT).","authors":"Meaghan A Rettele, Adham M Mohamed, Timothy P Berry, Sydney S Wilson, Julie A Welge, Shelby S Shemanski, Rebecca L Shriver, Shais S Jallu, Michelle M Haines, Aaron J Douglas, Majdi S Hamarshi, Jonathan B Kozinn","doi":"10.1053/j.jvca.2025.01.042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare clinical outcomes of patients with catecholamine-resistant vasodilatory shock (CRVS) receiving continuous renal replacement therapy who receive adjunctive angiotensin II (ANGII) to those who do not.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort analysis.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Multicenter, single health system consisting of one academic medical center and four community hospitals.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Critically ill adult patients with CRVS (norepinephrine or equivalent dose ≥0.5 mcg/kg/min).</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Adjunctive ANGII versus standard-of-care (SOC) vasopressors alone (norepinephrine, epinephrine, vasopressin, phenylephrine, dopamine).</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>The primary outcome was intensive care unit mortality. Secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score at 72 hours, time to shock resolution, and adverse effects. A multivariate logistic regression was used for the primary analysis. The study included 265 patients, of which 70 received ANGII and 195 received SOC. Intensive care unit and 30-day mortality were lower in patients that received ANGII (61.4% v 75.4%, adjusted odds ratio 0.438, 95% confidence interval: 0.239-0.805, p = 0.008; and 67.1% v 78.5%, adjusted odds ratio 0.479, 95% confidence interval: 0.256-0.898, p = 0.022). Differences in time to shock reversal and SOFA score at 72 hours were not statistically significant. The adverse effects evaluated were not statistically significant, apart from an increase in fungal infections in the ANGII group (17.1% v 7.2%, p = 0.016).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ANGII was associated with lower mortality in patients who received renal replacement therapy compared to SOC. This evaluation reaffirms a subgroup of patients that may benefit from the addition of ANGII.</p>","PeriodicalId":15176,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2025.01.042","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare clinical outcomes of patients with catecholamine-resistant vasodilatory shock (CRVS) receiving continuous renal replacement therapy who receive adjunctive angiotensin II (ANGII) to those who do not.

Design: Retrospective cohort analysis.

Setting: Multicenter, single health system consisting of one academic medical center and four community hospitals.

Participants: Critically ill adult patients with CRVS (norepinephrine or equivalent dose ≥0.5 mcg/kg/min).

Interventions: Adjunctive ANGII versus standard-of-care (SOC) vasopressors alone (norepinephrine, epinephrine, vasopressin, phenylephrine, dopamine).

Measurements and main results: The primary outcome was intensive care unit mortality. Secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score at 72 hours, time to shock resolution, and adverse effects. A multivariate logistic regression was used for the primary analysis. The study included 265 patients, of which 70 received ANGII and 195 received SOC. Intensive care unit and 30-day mortality were lower in patients that received ANGII (61.4% v 75.4%, adjusted odds ratio 0.438, 95% confidence interval: 0.239-0.805, p = 0.008; and 67.1% v 78.5%, adjusted odds ratio 0.479, 95% confidence interval: 0.256-0.898, p = 0.022). Differences in time to shock reversal and SOFA score at 72 hours were not statistically significant. The adverse effects evaluated were not statistically significant, apart from an increase in fungal infections in the ANGII group (17.1% v 7.2%, p = 0.016).

Conclusions: ANGII was associated with lower mortality in patients who received renal replacement therapy compared to SOC. This evaluation reaffirms a subgroup of patients that may benefit from the addition of ANGII.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
17.90%
发文量
606
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia is primarily aimed at anesthesiologists who deal with patients undergoing cardiac, thoracic or vascular surgical procedures. JCVA features a multidisciplinary approach, with contributions from cardiac, vascular and thoracic surgeons, cardiologists, and other related specialists. Emphasis is placed on rapid publication of clinically relevant material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信