Meaghan A Rettele, Adham M Mohamed, Timothy P Berry, Sydney S Wilson, Julie A Welge, Shelby S Shemanski, Rebecca L Shriver, Shais S Jallu, Michelle M Haines, Aaron J Douglas, Majdi S Hamarshi, Jonathan B Kozinn
{"title":"Evaluation of Angiotensin II in Patients With Catecholamine-Resistant Vasodilatory Shock Requiring Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy (ANGEL CRRT).","authors":"Meaghan A Rettele, Adham M Mohamed, Timothy P Berry, Sydney S Wilson, Julie A Welge, Shelby S Shemanski, Rebecca L Shriver, Shais S Jallu, Michelle M Haines, Aaron J Douglas, Majdi S Hamarshi, Jonathan B Kozinn","doi":"10.1053/j.jvca.2025.01.042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare clinical outcomes of patients with catecholamine-resistant vasodilatory shock (CRVS) receiving continuous renal replacement therapy who receive adjunctive angiotensin II (ANGII) to those who do not.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort analysis.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Multicenter, single health system consisting of one academic medical center and four community hospitals.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Critically ill adult patients with CRVS (norepinephrine or equivalent dose ≥0.5 mcg/kg/min).</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Adjunctive ANGII versus standard-of-care (SOC) vasopressors alone (norepinephrine, epinephrine, vasopressin, phenylephrine, dopamine).</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>The primary outcome was intensive care unit mortality. Secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score at 72 hours, time to shock resolution, and adverse effects. A multivariate logistic regression was used for the primary analysis. The study included 265 patients, of which 70 received ANGII and 195 received SOC. Intensive care unit and 30-day mortality were lower in patients that received ANGII (61.4% v 75.4%, adjusted odds ratio 0.438, 95% confidence interval: 0.239-0.805, p = 0.008; and 67.1% v 78.5%, adjusted odds ratio 0.479, 95% confidence interval: 0.256-0.898, p = 0.022). Differences in time to shock reversal and SOFA score at 72 hours were not statistically significant. The adverse effects evaluated were not statistically significant, apart from an increase in fungal infections in the ANGII group (17.1% v 7.2%, p = 0.016).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ANGII was associated with lower mortality in patients who received renal replacement therapy compared to SOC. This evaluation reaffirms a subgroup of patients that may benefit from the addition of ANGII.</p>","PeriodicalId":15176,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2025.01.042","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To compare clinical outcomes of patients with catecholamine-resistant vasodilatory shock (CRVS) receiving continuous renal replacement therapy who receive adjunctive angiotensin II (ANGII) to those who do not.
Design: Retrospective cohort analysis.
Setting: Multicenter, single health system consisting of one academic medical center and four community hospitals.
Participants: Critically ill adult patients with CRVS (norepinephrine or equivalent dose ≥0.5 mcg/kg/min).
Measurements and main results: The primary outcome was intensive care unit mortality. Secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score at 72 hours, time to shock resolution, and adverse effects. A multivariate logistic regression was used for the primary analysis. The study included 265 patients, of which 70 received ANGII and 195 received SOC. Intensive care unit and 30-day mortality were lower in patients that received ANGII (61.4% v 75.4%, adjusted odds ratio 0.438, 95% confidence interval: 0.239-0.805, p = 0.008; and 67.1% v 78.5%, adjusted odds ratio 0.479, 95% confidence interval: 0.256-0.898, p = 0.022). Differences in time to shock reversal and SOFA score at 72 hours were not statistically significant. The adverse effects evaluated were not statistically significant, apart from an increase in fungal infections in the ANGII group (17.1% v 7.2%, p = 0.016).
Conclusions: ANGII was associated with lower mortality in patients who received renal replacement therapy compared to SOC. This evaluation reaffirms a subgroup of patients that may benefit from the addition of ANGII.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia is primarily aimed at anesthesiologists who deal with patients undergoing cardiac, thoracic or vascular surgical procedures. JCVA features a multidisciplinary approach, with contributions from cardiac, vascular and thoracic surgeons, cardiologists, and other related specialists. Emphasis is placed on rapid publication of clinically relevant material.