Tranexamic acid in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: a meta-analysis.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Yu Chang, Pei-Chun Lai, Chih-Yuan Huang, Junmin Song, Kuan-Yu Chi, Hsiang-Yi Hung, Yen-Ta Huang
{"title":"Tranexamic acid in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: a meta-analysis.","authors":"Yu Chang, Pei-Chun Lai, Chih-Yuan Huang, Junmin Song, Kuan-Yu Chi, Hsiang-Yi Hung, Yen-Ta Huang","doi":"10.1186/s40001-025-02385-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) is a critical and disabling form of stroke and accounts for an obvious number of stroke-related deaths and disabilities globally. Hematoma growth is a key target for therapeutic intervention because of its association with poor outcomes. Recently, the STOP-MSU trial showed that intravenous tranexamic acid (TA) did not reduce hematoma growth or improve clinical outcomes when administered within 2 h of intracerebral hemorrhage symptom onset. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of TA in reducing hematoma growth and improving clinical outcomes in patients with spontaneous sICH by incorporating the findings from the latest STOP-MSU trial and consolidating past research to clarify the overall efficacy and safety of TA on sICH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and PRISMA guidelines. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing TA to placebo in adult patients with sICH. Databases such as PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane were searched up to May 2024. Key outcomes analyzed included hematoma expansion, mortality within 90 days, thromboembolic events, and favorable functional outcomes. Data were pooled using a random-effects model and analyzed using the \"metafor\" package in RStudio.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five RCTs involving 1419 patients were included. The meta-analysis showed no significant difference in hematoma expansion (odds ratio [OR] 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74-1.03), mortality within 90 days (OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.86-1.24), thromboembolic events (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.69-1.64), and favorable functional outcomes (modified Rankin Scale of 0-2 at 90 days; OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.88-1.22) between the TA and placebo groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TA does not significantly reduce hematoma growth or improve clinical outcomes in patients with sICH. Despite its affordability and availability, the routine use of TA in sICH is not supported by current evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":11949,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Medical Research","volume":"30 1","pages":"133"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-025-02385-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) is a critical and disabling form of stroke and accounts for an obvious number of stroke-related deaths and disabilities globally. Hematoma growth is a key target for therapeutic intervention because of its association with poor outcomes. Recently, the STOP-MSU trial showed that intravenous tranexamic acid (TA) did not reduce hematoma growth or improve clinical outcomes when administered within 2 h of intracerebral hemorrhage symptom onset. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of TA in reducing hematoma growth and improving clinical outcomes in patients with spontaneous sICH by incorporating the findings from the latest STOP-MSU trial and consolidating past research to clarify the overall efficacy and safety of TA on sICH.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and PRISMA guidelines. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing TA to placebo in adult patients with sICH. Databases such as PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane were searched up to May 2024. Key outcomes analyzed included hematoma expansion, mortality within 90 days, thromboembolic events, and favorable functional outcomes. Data were pooled using a random-effects model and analyzed using the "metafor" package in RStudio.

Results: Five RCTs involving 1419 patients were included. The meta-analysis showed no significant difference in hematoma expansion (odds ratio [OR] 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74-1.03), mortality within 90 days (OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.86-1.24), thromboembolic events (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.69-1.64), and favorable functional outcomes (modified Rankin Scale of 0-2 at 90 days; OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.88-1.22) between the TA and placebo groups.

Conclusions: TA does not significantly reduce hematoma growth or improve clinical outcomes in patients with sICH. Despite its affordability and availability, the routine use of TA in sICH is not supported by current evidence.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Medical Research
European Journal of Medical Research 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
247
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Medical Research publishes translational and clinical research of international interest across all medical disciplines, enabling clinicians and other researchers to learn about developments and innovations within these disciplines and across the boundaries between disciplines. The journal publishes high quality research and reviews and aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted research are published, regardless of their outcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信