PRG4CNN: A Probabilistic Model Checking-Driven Robustness Guarantee Framework for CNNs.

IF 2.1 3区 物理与天体物理 Q2 PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Entropy Pub Date : 2025-02-03 DOI:10.3390/e27020163
Yang Liu, Aohui Fang
{"title":"PRG4CNN: A Probabilistic Model Checking-Driven Robustness Guarantee Framework for CNNs.","authors":"Yang Liu, Aohui Fang","doi":"10.3390/e27020163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As an important kind of DNN (deep neural network), CNN (convolutional neural network) has made remarkable progress and been widely used in the vision and decision-making of autonomous robots. Nonetheless, in many scenarios, even a minor perturbation in input for CNNs may lead to serious errors, which means CNNs lack robustness. Formal verification is an effective method to guarantee the robustness of CNNs. Existing works predominantly concentrate on local robustness verification, which requires considerable time and space. Probabilistic robustness quantifies the robustness of CNNs, which is a practical mode of potential measurement. The state-of-the-art of probabilistic robustness verification is a test-driven approach, which is used to manually decide whether a DNN satisfies the probabilistic robustness and does not involve robustness repair. Robustness repair can improve the robustness of CNNs further. To address this issue, we propose a probabilistic model checking-driven robustness guarantee framework for CNNs, i.e., PRG4CNN. This is the first automated and complete framework for guaranteeing the probabilistic robustness of CNNs. It comprises four steps, as follows: (1) modeling a CNN as an MDP (Markov decision processes) by model learning, (2) specifying the probabilistic robustness of the CNN via the PCTL (Probabilistic Computational Tree Logic) formula, (3) verifying the probabilistic robustness with a probabilistic model checker, and (4) probabilistic robustness repair by counterexample-guided sensitivity analysis, if probabilistic robustness does not hold on the CNN. We here conduct experiments on various scales of CNNs trained on the handwriting dataset MNIST, and demonstrate the effectiveness of PRG4CNN.</p>","PeriodicalId":11694,"journal":{"name":"Entropy","volume":"27 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11854547/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Entropy","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/e27020163","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As an important kind of DNN (deep neural network), CNN (convolutional neural network) has made remarkable progress and been widely used in the vision and decision-making of autonomous robots. Nonetheless, in many scenarios, even a minor perturbation in input for CNNs may lead to serious errors, which means CNNs lack robustness. Formal verification is an effective method to guarantee the robustness of CNNs. Existing works predominantly concentrate on local robustness verification, which requires considerable time and space. Probabilistic robustness quantifies the robustness of CNNs, which is a practical mode of potential measurement. The state-of-the-art of probabilistic robustness verification is a test-driven approach, which is used to manually decide whether a DNN satisfies the probabilistic robustness and does not involve robustness repair. Robustness repair can improve the robustness of CNNs further. To address this issue, we propose a probabilistic model checking-driven robustness guarantee framework for CNNs, i.e., PRG4CNN. This is the first automated and complete framework for guaranteeing the probabilistic robustness of CNNs. It comprises four steps, as follows: (1) modeling a CNN as an MDP (Markov decision processes) by model learning, (2) specifying the probabilistic robustness of the CNN via the PCTL (Probabilistic Computational Tree Logic) formula, (3) verifying the probabilistic robustness with a probabilistic model checker, and (4) probabilistic robustness repair by counterexample-guided sensitivity analysis, if probabilistic robustness does not hold on the CNN. We here conduct experiments on various scales of CNNs trained on the handwriting dataset MNIST, and demonstrate the effectiveness of PRG4CNN.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Entropy
Entropy PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
1580
审稿时长
21.05 days
期刊介绍: Entropy (ISSN 1099-4300), an international and interdisciplinary journal of entropy and information studies, publishes reviews, regular research papers and short notes. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish as much as possible their theoretical and experimental details. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. If there are computation and the experiment, the details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信