Perceptual Complexity as Normalized Shannon Entropy.

IF 2.1 3区 物理与天体物理 Q2 PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Entropy Pub Date : 2025-02-05 DOI:10.3390/e27020166
Norberto M Grzywacz
{"title":"Perceptual Complexity as Normalized Shannon Entropy.","authors":"Norberto M Grzywacz","doi":"10.3390/e27020166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Complexity is one of the most important variables in how the brain performs decision making based on esthetic values. Multiple definitions of perceptual complexity have been proposed, with one of the most fruitful being the Normalized Shannon Entropy one. However, the Normalized Shannon Entropy definition has theoretical gaps that we address in this article. Focusing on visual perception, we first address whether normalization fully corrects for the effects of measurement resolution on entropy. The answer is negative, but the remaining effects are minor, and we propose alternate definitions of complexity, correcting this problem. Related to resolution, we discuss the ideal spatial range in the computation of spatial complexity. The results show that this range must be small but not too small. Furthermore, it is suggested by the analysis of this range that perceptual spatial complexity is based solely on translational isometry. Finally, we study how the complexities of distinct visual variables interact. We argue that the complexities of the variables of interest to the brain's visual system may not interact linearly because of interclass correlation. But the interaction would be linear if the brain weighed complexities as in Kempthorne's λ-Bayes-based compromise problem. We finish by listing several experimental tests of these theoretical ideas on complexity.</p>","PeriodicalId":11694,"journal":{"name":"Entropy","volume":"27 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11854106/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Entropy","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/e27020166","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Complexity is one of the most important variables in how the brain performs decision making based on esthetic values. Multiple definitions of perceptual complexity have been proposed, with one of the most fruitful being the Normalized Shannon Entropy one. However, the Normalized Shannon Entropy definition has theoretical gaps that we address in this article. Focusing on visual perception, we first address whether normalization fully corrects for the effects of measurement resolution on entropy. The answer is negative, but the remaining effects are minor, and we propose alternate definitions of complexity, correcting this problem. Related to resolution, we discuss the ideal spatial range in the computation of spatial complexity. The results show that this range must be small but not too small. Furthermore, it is suggested by the analysis of this range that perceptual spatial complexity is based solely on translational isometry. Finally, we study how the complexities of distinct visual variables interact. We argue that the complexities of the variables of interest to the brain's visual system may not interact linearly because of interclass correlation. But the interaction would be linear if the brain weighed complexities as in Kempthorne's λ-Bayes-based compromise problem. We finish by listing several experimental tests of these theoretical ideas on complexity.

归一化香农熵的感知复杂度。
复杂性是大脑如何根据审美价值进行决策的最重要变量之一。知觉复杂性的多种定义已经被提出,其中最有成果的是归一化香农熵的定义。然而,归一化香农熵的定义存在理论缺陷,我们将在本文中加以解决。关注视觉感知,我们首先解决归一化是否完全纠正测量分辨率对熵的影响。答案是否定的,但剩余的影响是次要的,我们提出了复杂性的替代定义,以纠正这个问题。与分辨率相关,讨论了空间复杂度计算中的理想空间范围。结果表明,该范围一定要小,但不能太小。此外,通过对这一范围的分析表明,感知空间复杂性仅基于平移等距。最后,我们研究了不同视觉变量的复杂性是如何相互作用的。我们认为,由于类间相关性,大脑视觉系统感兴趣的变量的复杂性可能不会线性地相互作用。但如果大脑像肯普索恩的基于λ贝叶斯的妥协问题那样权衡复杂性,这种相互作用将是线性的。最后,我们列出了对这些关于复杂性的理论观点的几个实验测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Entropy
Entropy PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
1580
审稿时长
21.05 days
期刊介绍: Entropy (ISSN 1099-4300), an international and interdisciplinary journal of entropy and information studies, publishes reviews, regular research papers and short notes. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish as much as possible their theoretical and experimental details. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. If there are computation and the experiment, the details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信