Use of the mini-forceps traction-assisted cannulation technique when standard ERCP methods fail: Single-center retrospective study.

IF 2.2 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Endoscopy International Open Pub Date : 2025-01-29 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2509-7369
Ankit Mishra, Charles Meade, Allison R Schulman, George Philips, Jorge D Machicado
{"title":"Use of the mini-forceps traction-assisted cannulation technique when standard ERCP methods fail: Single-center retrospective study.","authors":"Ankit Mishra, Charles Meade, Allison R Schulman, George Philips, Jorge D Machicado","doi":"10.1055/a-2509-7369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and study aims: </strong>There are few salvage techniques for achieving biliary cannulation when no duct can be accessed.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed 10 consecutive cases in which the mini-forceps traction-assisted cannulation technique (MFTAC) was used after failure of any duct access during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Outcomes included technical success, use of adjunct techniques; time to biliary access; and adverse events (AEs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most patients had a native papilla (n = 9) of peri-diverticular location (n = 5) and a benign indication (n = 6). Standard cannulation was unsuccessful over 8:23 mm:ss (interquartile range [IQR] 6:04-19:43). MFTAC had 100% technical success, achieved biliary access after 17:38 mm:ss (IQR 8:52-20:31), and had a 10% incidence of AEs (post-ERCP pancreatitis). MFTAC was sufficient to allow biliary cannulation in three cases and allowed pancreatic duct access in seven cases, which then allowed biliary cannulation with double-wire technique (5/10) and transpancreatic septotomy (2/10).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MFTAC is a feasible salvage approach for biliary access when standard cannulation methods fail.</p>","PeriodicalId":11671,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy International Open","volume":"13 ","pages":"a25097369"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11855253/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopy International Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2509-7369","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and study aims: There are few salvage techniques for achieving biliary cannulation when no duct can be accessed.

Patients and methods: We retrospectively reviewed 10 consecutive cases in which the mini-forceps traction-assisted cannulation technique (MFTAC) was used after failure of any duct access during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Outcomes included technical success, use of adjunct techniques; time to biliary access; and adverse events (AEs).

Results: Most patients had a native papilla (n = 9) of peri-diverticular location (n = 5) and a benign indication (n = 6). Standard cannulation was unsuccessful over 8:23 mm:ss (interquartile range [IQR] 6:04-19:43). MFTAC had 100% technical success, achieved biliary access after 17:38 mm:ss (IQR 8:52-20:31), and had a 10% incidence of AEs (post-ERCP pancreatitis). MFTAC was sufficient to allow biliary cannulation in three cases and allowed pancreatic duct access in seven cases, which then allowed biliary cannulation with double-wire technique (5/10) and transpancreatic septotomy (2/10).

Conclusions: MFTAC is a feasible salvage approach for biliary access when standard cannulation methods fail.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Endoscopy International Open
Endoscopy International Open GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
3.80%
发文量
270
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信