Deciphering Perspectives: A European Survey on Clinical Decision Support Tools for Dementia and Alzheimer's Disease.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Ini Umoh, Xin Xia, Bengt Winblad, Sandar Aye, Emil Aho, Hanneke F M Rhodius-Meester, Linus Jönsson
{"title":"Deciphering Perspectives: A European Survey on Clinical Decision Support Tools for Dementia and Alzheimer's Disease.","authors":"Ini Umoh, Xin Xia, Bengt Winblad, Sandar Aye, Emil Aho, Hanneke F M Rhodius-Meester, Linus Jönsson","doi":"10.1159/000544801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Technological advancements like digital monitoring tools, disease-modifying therapies, and artificial intelligence have been shown to improve the clinical management of neurocognitive diseases like Alzheimer's disease (AD). To enhance implementation in daily practice, users' input is essential in the technology development process. This study aimed to determine clinician's perspective of clinical decision support systems (CDSS) in the management of dementia and AD.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A survey was conducted targeting clinicians practicing in the field of dementia across Europe. A sixty-five-item digital questionnaire was administered, and opinions were inquired across the domains of diagnosis, disease-modifying therapy, and prognosis, including factors that affect tool implementation and utilization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-four clinicians (including specialist physicians, psychologists, and nurses) responded to this survey, and more than 50% had no knowledge or experience with CDSS. Most of the respondents reported the ability to predict the likelihood of AD as the most important diagnostic function. It was surprising to find the middling responses for the ability to predict amyloid positivity. The majority indicated assessment of treatment eligibility for disease-modifying therapy as vital, and the ability to predict cognitive and functional decline as the most important prognostic functions. Data accuracy and ease of use were noted as most necessary to facilitate CDSS adoption and implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings from this study contribute to the future development of CDSS in this field, especially regarding the approval and imminent use of disease-modifying therapies, a comprehensive tool that is precise and user friendly would improve clinical decisions and efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":11126,"journal":{"name":"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000544801","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Technological advancements like digital monitoring tools, disease-modifying therapies, and artificial intelligence have been shown to improve the clinical management of neurocognitive diseases like Alzheimer's disease (AD). To enhance implementation in daily practice, users' input is essential in the technology development process. This study aimed to determine clinician's perspective of clinical decision support systems (CDSS) in the management of dementia and AD.

Method: A survey was conducted targeting clinicians practicing in the field of dementia across Europe. A sixty-five-item digital questionnaire was administered, and opinions were inquired across the domains of diagnosis, disease-modifying therapy, and prognosis, including factors that affect tool implementation and utilization.

Results: Eighty-four clinicians (including specialist physicians, psychologists, and nurses) responded to this survey, and more than 50% had no knowledge or experience with CDSS. Most of the respondents reported the ability to predict the likelihood of AD as the most important diagnostic function. It was surprising to find the middling responses for the ability to predict amyloid positivity. The majority indicated assessment of treatment eligibility for disease-modifying therapy as vital, and the ability to predict cognitive and functional decline as the most important prognostic functions. Data accuracy and ease of use were noted as most necessary to facilitate CDSS adoption and implementation.

Conclusion: Findings from this study contribute to the future development of CDSS in this field, especially regarding the approval and imminent use of disease-modifying therapies, a comprehensive tool that is precise and user friendly would improve clinical decisions and efficiency.

解读视角:一项关于痴呆症和阿尔茨海默病临床决策支持工具的欧洲调查。
技术进步,如数字监测工具,疾病修饰疗法和人工智能已经被证明可以改善阿尔茨海默病(AD)等神经认知疾病的临床管理。为了在日常实践中加强实施,用户的投入在技术开发过程中是必不可少的。本研究旨在确定临床医生对临床决策支持系统(CDSS)在痴呆和AD管理中的观点。方法:一项针对在欧洲痴呆症领域执业的临床医生进行的调查。一份65项的数字问卷进行了管理,并询问了诊断、疾病改善治疗和预后等领域的意见,包括影响工具实施和利用的因素。结果:84名临床医生(包括专科医生、心理学家和护士)参与了本次调查,超过50%的临床医生对CDSS没有了解或经验。大多数应答者报告说,预测AD可能性的能力是最重要的诊断功能。令人惊讶的是,在预测淀粉样蛋白阳性的能力方面,人们的反应一般。大多数人指出,对疾病改善治疗的治疗资格进行评估是至关重要的,预测认知和功能衰退的能力是最重要的预后功能。与会者指出,数据准确和易于使用是促进采用和实施CDSS的最必要条件。结论:本研究的发现有助于CDSS在该领域的未来发展,特别是在疾病修饰疗法的批准和即将使用方面,一个精确和用户友好的全面工具将提高临床决策和效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: As a unique forum devoted exclusively to the study of cognitive dysfunction, ''Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders'' concentrates on Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease, Huntington’s chorea and other neurodegenerative diseases. The journal draws from diverse related research disciplines such as psychogeriatrics, neuropsychology, clinical neurology, morphology, physiology, genetic molecular biology, pathology, biochemistry, immunology, pharmacology and pharmaceutics. Strong emphasis is placed on the publication of research findings from animal studies which are complemented by clinical and therapeutic experience to give an overall appreciation of the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信