Factors associated with nonparticipation and loss to follow-up in bereavement research using data from a cohort of parents with a loss in pregnancy or the neonatal period.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Sofie Mørk, Sören Möller, Maja O'Connor, Tine Brink Henriksen, Dorte Hvidtjørn
{"title":"Factors associated with nonparticipation and loss to follow-up in bereavement research using data from a cohort of parents with a loss in pregnancy or the neonatal period.","authors":"Sofie Mørk, Sören Möller, Maja O'Connor, Tine Brink Henriksen, Dorte Hvidtjørn","doi":"10.1080/07481187.2025.2469138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Factors shaping participation in longitudinal cohorts may introduce bias, but there is a lack of research concerning participation patterns in cohorts of bereaved. Our aim was to study this in a longitudinal cohort of parents with a loss in pregnancy or during the neonatal period. Using data from the Danish national registers we identified all parents who experienced a pregnancy or neonatal loss in 2016-2018 and linked that with data on participants from the Life After the Loss cohort. Analyzing 725 parents, baseline participation was 25.7%, with 72.6% and 59.7% continuing at the seven- and 13-month follow-up. Partners and parents with lower education were underrepresented at baseline and at follow-up. Although not statistically significant, substantial underrepresentation of parents with mental health conditions and of parents who lived alone was observed at baseline. Although initial participation was low, after enrollment, most parents engaged in follow-up, minimizing the risk of attrition bias.</p>","PeriodicalId":11041,"journal":{"name":"Death Studies","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Death Studies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2025.2469138","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Factors shaping participation in longitudinal cohorts may introduce bias, but there is a lack of research concerning participation patterns in cohorts of bereaved. Our aim was to study this in a longitudinal cohort of parents with a loss in pregnancy or during the neonatal period. Using data from the Danish national registers we identified all parents who experienced a pregnancy or neonatal loss in 2016-2018 and linked that with data on participants from the Life After the Loss cohort. Analyzing 725 parents, baseline participation was 25.7%, with 72.6% and 59.7% continuing at the seven- and 13-month follow-up. Partners and parents with lower education were underrepresented at baseline and at follow-up. Although not statistically significant, substantial underrepresentation of parents with mental health conditions and of parents who lived alone was observed at baseline. Although initial participation was low, after enrollment, most parents engaged in follow-up, minimizing the risk of attrition bias.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Death Studies
Death Studies Multiple-
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
7.90%
发文量
94
期刊介绍: Now published ten times each year, this acclaimed journal provides refereed papers on significant research, scholarship, and practical approaches in the fast growing areas of bereavement and loss, grief therapy, death attitudes, suicide, and death education. It provides an international interdisciplinary forum in which a variety of professionals share results of research and practice, with the aim of better understanding the human encounter with death and assisting those who work with the dying and their families.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信