Real world results of ibrutinib in patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a meta-analysis of clinical studies.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Mohammad Amin Karimi, Hanieh Norooziseyedhosseini, Reza Khademi, Alireza Ghajary, Haniyeh Kargar, Seyyedeh Sana Abdollahi, Mohaddeseh Belbasi, Mahdyieh Naziri, Niloofar Deravi, Sajjad Hajihosseini, Saharnaz Mofidi
{"title":"Real world results of ibrutinib in patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a meta-analysis of clinical studies.","authors":"Mohammad Amin Karimi, Hanieh Norooziseyedhosseini, Reza Khademi, Alireza Ghajary, Haniyeh Kargar, Seyyedeh Sana Abdollahi, Mohaddeseh Belbasi, Mahdyieh Naziri, Niloofar Deravi, Sajjad Hajihosseini, Saharnaz Mofidi","doi":"10.1186/s40360-024-00832-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a B-cell malignancy primarily diagnosed in older adults. For younger patients, treatment options often include regimens based on fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab; however, at least 20% of patients exhibit resistance to these therapies. Ibrutinib, a covalent Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor, has demonstrated enhanced safety compared to conventional treatments. This meta-analysis examines the efficacy and safety of ibrutinib in managing relapsed/refractory CLL.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Relevant keywords were used to conduct a comprehensive search across online databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Data related to complete response (CR), overall response rate (ORR), and adverse events were extracted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ibrutinib treatment. The results were presented in forest plots illustrating event rates and risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CI), while heterogeneity was assessed using I² statistics. Funnel plots were employed to examine potential publication bias visually.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Twenty-one studies were included in this meta-analysis. Ibrutinib as a single-agent treatment was associated with a 9% complete response (CR) rate (95% CI: 5-14%) and a 77% overall response rate (ORR) (95% CI: 70-83%). When combined with other agents, ibrutinib achieved a CR rate of 21% (95% CI: 9-41%) and an ORR of 84% (95% CI: 80-88%). Adverse events were not significantly correlated with treatment outcomes. Funnel plots indicated no significant publication bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Single-agent ibrutinib has proven to be an effective therapy for patients with relapsed/refractory CLL. However, combining ibrutinib with other agents has demonstrated enhanced treatment efficacy. Further studies are needed to evaluate the safety profile of this therapeutic regimen thoroughly.</p>","PeriodicalId":9023,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pharmacology & Toxicology","volume":"26 1","pages":"43"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pharmacology & Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40360-024-00832-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a B-cell malignancy primarily diagnosed in older adults. For younger patients, treatment options often include regimens based on fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab; however, at least 20% of patients exhibit resistance to these therapies. Ibrutinib, a covalent Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor, has demonstrated enhanced safety compared to conventional treatments. This meta-analysis examines the efficacy and safety of ibrutinib in managing relapsed/refractory CLL.

Method: Relevant keywords were used to conduct a comprehensive search across online databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Data related to complete response (CR), overall response rate (ORR), and adverse events were extracted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ibrutinib treatment. The results were presented in forest plots illustrating event rates and risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CI), while heterogeneity was assessed using I² statistics. Funnel plots were employed to examine potential publication bias visually.

Result: Twenty-one studies were included in this meta-analysis. Ibrutinib as a single-agent treatment was associated with a 9% complete response (CR) rate (95% CI: 5-14%) and a 77% overall response rate (ORR) (95% CI: 70-83%). When combined with other agents, ibrutinib achieved a CR rate of 21% (95% CI: 9-41%) and an ORR of 84% (95% CI: 80-88%). Adverse events were not significantly correlated with treatment outcomes. Funnel plots indicated no significant publication bias.

Conclusion: Single-agent ibrutinib has proven to be an effective therapy for patients with relapsed/refractory CLL. However, combining ibrutinib with other agents has demonstrated enhanced treatment efficacy. Further studies are needed to evaluate the safety profile of this therapeutic regimen thoroughly.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Pharmacology & Toxicology
BMC Pharmacology & Toxicology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACYTOXICOLOGY&nb-TOXICOLOGY
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of chemically defined therapeutic and toxic agents. The journal welcomes submissions from all fields of experimental and clinical pharmacology including clinical trials and toxicology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信