Haemorrhage-related adverse events profles of lenvatinib and pembrolizumab alone or in combination: a real-world pharmacovigilance study based on FAERS database.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Shiqiao Wang, Guizhi Ren, Heng Pan, Jiayi Chen, Jiayu Huang, Qinghua Mei, Zhongze Li, Guosheng Zou
{"title":"Haemorrhage-related adverse events profles of lenvatinib and pembrolizumab alone or in combination: a real-world pharmacovigilance study based on FAERS database.","authors":"Shiqiao Wang, Guizhi Ren, Heng Pan, Jiayi Chen, Jiayu Huang, Qinghua Mei, Zhongze Li, Guosheng Zou","doi":"10.1186/s40360-025-00878-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Limited understanding exists regarding the haemorrhagic risk resulting from potential interactions between lenvatinib and pembrolizumab. We investigated haemorrhagic adverse events (ADEs) associated with co-administration of lenvatinib and pembrolizumab using data from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) in an effort to provide recommendations for their safe and sensible use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The FAERS database's bleeding events linked to lenvatinib and pembrolizumab were carefully examined. Haemorrhagic signals mining was performed by the reported odds ratios (RORs) and information component (IC), corroborated by additive and multiplicative models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 38,416,055 adverse event cases were analyzed, with 1188 bleeding events records in the lenvatinib alone, 952 bleeding events records in the pembrolizumab alone and 420 bleeding events reports in the combination therapy, respectively. We observed a significantly higher risk of haemorrhage with the combination of lenvatinib and pembrolizumab compare with pembrolizumab alone. In addition, in the baseline model analysis of suspected bleeding adverse reactions, the additive model detected an increased incidence of small intestinal haemorrhage caused by combination therapy, and found no risk signals of tumour haemorrhage and tracheal haemorrhage; the results of multiplicative model are all negative.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The analysis of FAERS data reveals different levels of haemorrhagic risk when lenvatinib and pembrolizumab are administered concurrently, highlighting the significance of being cautious when using them in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":9023,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pharmacology & Toxicology","volume":"26 1","pages":"44"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11863795/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pharmacology & Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40360-025-00878-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Limited understanding exists regarding the haemorrhagic risk resulting from potential interactions between lenvatinib and pembrolizumab. We investigated haemorrhagic adverse events (ADEs) associated with co-administration of lenvatinib and pembrolizumab using data from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) in an effort to provide recommendations for their safe and sensible use.

Methods: The FAERS database's bleeding events linked to lenvatinib and pembrolizumab were carefully examined. Haemorrhagic signals mining was performed by the reported odds ratios (RORs) and information component (IC), corroborated by additive and multiplicative models.

Results: A total of 38,416,055 adverse event cases were analyzed, with 1188 bleeding events records in the lenvatinib alone, 952 bleeding events records in the pembrolizumab alone and 420 bleeding events reports in the combination therapy, respectively. We observed a significantly higher risk of haemorrhage with the combination of lenvatinib and pembrolizumab compare with pembrolizumab alone. In addition, in the baseline model analysis of suspected bleeding adverse reactions, the additive model detected an increased incidence of small intestinal haemorrhage caused by combination therapy, and found no risk signals of tumour haemorrhage and tracheal haemorrhage; the results of multiplicative model are all negative.

Conclusion: The analysis of FAERS data reveals different levels of haemorrhagic risk when lenvatinib and pembrolizumab are administered concurrently, highlighting the significance of being cautious when using them in clinical practice.

lenvatinib和pembrolizumab单独或联合的出血相关不良事件概况:基于FAERS数据库的现实世界药物警戒研究
目的:关于lenvatinib和pembrolizumab之间潜在相互作用导致的出血风险的了解有限。我们使用来自美国食品和药物管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)的数据调查了lenvatinib和pembrolizumab联合给药相关的出血性不良事件(ADEs),试图为其安全和合理使用提供建议。方法:仔细检查FAERS数据库中lenvatinib和pembrolizumab相关的出血事件。出血信号挖掘是通过报告的优势比(RORs)和信息成分(IC)进行的,并通过加法和乘法模型加以证实。结果:共分析38,416,055例不良事件,lenvatinib单用组出血事件记录1188例,pembrolizumab单用组出血事件记录952例,联合用药组出血事件报告420例。我们观察到lenvatinib和pembrolizumab联合使用的出血风险明显高于单独使用pembrolizumab。此外,在疑似出血不良反应的基线模型分析中,加性模型检测到联合治疗引起的小肠出血发生率增加,未发现肿瘤出血和气管出血的风险信号;乘法模型的结果都是负的。结论:FAERS数据分析显示lenvatinib和pembrolizumab同时使用时出血风险水平不同,强调在临床实践中谨慎使用的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Pharmacology & Toxicology
BMC Pharmacology & Toxicology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACYTOXICOLOGY&nb-TOXICOLOGY
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of chemically defined therapeutic and toxic agents. The journal welcomes submissions from all fields of experimental and clinical pharmacology including clinical trials and toxicology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信