Rocio Barriga Guzman, Manuel Villegas Roberson, Larissa Teixeira, Denilsa D P Navalha, Armando Talavera, Muhammad Ahmad, Yiannis Chatzizisis, Nikolaos Spilias
{"title":"Ticagrelor Monotherapy Following Short-Term DAPT in ACS Undergoing PCI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Rocio Barriga Guzman, Manuel Villegas Roberson, Larissa Teixeira, Denilsa D P Navalha, Armando Talavera, Muhammad Ahmad, Yiannis Chatzizisis, Nikolaos Spilias","doi":"10.1002/ccd.31459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 1 year after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES) is the standard of care. However, it is associated with a higher incidence of bleeding events. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the safety and efficacy of short-term DAPT.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to assess the relative risk of major and minor bleeding, net adverse clinical and cerebral events (NACCE), and all-cause mortality in patients with ACS undergoing PCI with DES, comparing ticagrelor-based short-term DAPT (≤ 3 months) followed by ticagrelor monotherapy for up to 12 months versus 12-month DAPT. The secondary endpoint evaluated the relative risk of complications, including myocardial infarction, stroke, stent thrombosis, repeat revascularization, and cardiovascular mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Central was conducted for eligible RCTs. A subgroup analysis of ultrashort-term DAPT (≤ 1 month) followed by ticagrelor monotherapy for up to 12 months was also performed. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five RCTs were included with a total of 21,407 patients. Short-term DAPT was associated with a significant reduction in major bleeding (RR 0.50; 95% CI 0.38-0.66; p < 0.01), minor bleeding (RR 0.53; 95% CI 0.35-0.80; p < 0.01), NACCE (RR 0.71; 95% CI 0.59-0.85; p < 0.01), and all-cause mortality (RR 0.78; 95% CI 0.62-0.98; p =0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Short-term DAPT followed by ticagrelor monotherapy up to 12 months was associated with a significant reduction in major and minor bleeding, NACCE, and all-cause mortality compared to 12-month DAPT. There were no significant differences in myocardial infarction, stroke, stent thrombosis, repeat revascularization, or cardiovascular mortality. Major bleeding and NACCE remained consistently reduced in the subgroup analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":9650,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.31459","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 1 year after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES) is the standard of care. However, it is associated with a higher incidence of bleeding events. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the safety and efficacy of short-term DAPT.
Aims: This study aimed to assess the relative risk of major and minor bleeding, net adverse clinical and cerebral events (NACCE), and all-cause mortality in patients with ACS undergoing PCI with DES, comparing ticagrelor-based short-term DAPT (≤ 3 months) followed by ticagrelor monotherapy for up to 12 months versus 12-month DAPT. The secondary endpoint evaluated the relative risk of complications, including myocardial infarction, stroke, stent thrombosis, repeat revascularization, and cardiovascular mortality.
Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Central was conducted for eligible RCTs. A subgroup analysis of ultrashort-term DAPT (≤ 1 month) followed by ticagrelor monotherapy for up to 12 months was also performed. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model.
Results: Five RCTs were included with a total of 21,407 patients. Short-term DAPT was associated with a significant reduction in major bleeding (RR 0.50; 95% CI 0.38-0.66; p < 0.01), minor bleeding (RR 0.53; 95% CI 0.35-0.80; p < 0.01), NACCE (RR 0.71; 95% CI 0.59-0.85; p < 0.01), and all-cause mortality (RR 0.78; 95% CI 0.62-0.98; p =0.04).
Conclusions: Short-term DAPT followed by ticagrelor monotherapy up to 12 months was associated with a significant reduction in major and minor bleeding, NACCE, and all-cause mortality compared to 12-month DAPT. There were no significant differences in myocardial infarction, stroke, stent thrombosis, repeat revascularization, or cardiovascular mortality. Major bleeding and NACCE remained consistently reduced in the subgroup analysis.
期刊介绍:
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions is an international journal covering the broad field of cardiovascular diseases. Subject material includes basic and clinical information that is derived from or related to invasive and interventional coronary or peripheral vascular techniques. The journal focuses on material that will be of immediate practical value to physicians providing patient care in the clinical laboratory setting. To accomplish this, the journal publishes Preliminary Reports and Work In Progress articles that complement the traditional Original Studies, Case Reports, and Comprehensive Reviews. Perspective and insight concerning controversial subjects and evolving technologies are provided regularly through Editorial Commentaries furnished by members of the Editorial Board and other experts. Articles are subject to double-blind peer review and complete editorial evaluation prior to any decision regarding acceptability.