Biomechanical Analysis of Cycle-Tempo Effects on Motor Control Among Jump Rope Elites.

IF 3.8 3区医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL

Bioengineering Pub Date : 2025-02-08 DOI:10.3390/bioengineering12020162

Qi Zhou, Yufeng Liu, Jianguo Kang, Xiuping Wang, Kai Zhang, Gongbing Shan

{"title":"Biomechanical Analysis of Cycle-Tempo Effects on Motor Control Among Jump Rope Elites.","authors":"Qi Zhou, Yufeng Liu, Jianguo Kang, Xiuping Wang, Kai Zhang, Gongbing Shan","doi":"10.3390/bioengineering12020162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Jump rope is a widely applied basic training technique in various sports, yet it is understudied biomechanically. This study investigates the impact of cycle-tempo-induced motor control changes in elite jump rope athletes, addressing the biomechanical gap of cyclic skill control. The hypothesis posited two accelerations per jump cycle-one in front of and one behind the body-and anticipated that increased cycle frequency would alter the distribution of acceleration time within a cycle. Using 3D motion capture technology, 12 young elite jump rope athletes were analyzed at 100, 140, and 180 revolutions per minute (rpm). The kinematic parameters obtained confirmed the presence of two distinct accelerations per cycle. As tempo increased, the percentage of rear acceleration time increased from 9.58% at 100 rpm to 17.42% at 180 rpm, while front acceleration time decreased from 39.03% at 100 rpm to 31.40% at 180 rpm, along with peak velocities increasing from 12.94 m/s at 100 rpm to 22.74 m/s at 180 rpm significantly (p < 0.01). Rope trajectory analysis indicated a consistent movement pattern across tempos, primarily in the sagittal plane. Variations in skill control revealed shorter contact phases, decreasing from 61.53% at 100 rpm to 48.25% at 180 rpm, as well as a reduced vertical range of motion for the center of gravity (from 0.15 body height at 100 rpm to 0.06 body height at 180 rpm) and feet (from 0.05 body height at 100 rpm to 0.03 body height at 180 rpm) (p < 0.05). Significant reductions were also observed in the flexion/extension range of motion for the hip (from 22.31° at 100 rpm to 3.47° at 180 rpm), knee (from 49.31° at 100 rpm to 9.35° at 180 rpm), and ankle (from 52.99° at 100 rpm to 21.41° at 180 rpm) (p < 0.01). These findings enhance the understanding of motor control adaptations to different tempos and have practical implications for developing coaching programs aimed at optimizing performance, stability, and efficiency in jump rope training.","PeriodicalId":8874,"journal":{"name":"Bioengineering","volume":"12 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11851774/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioengineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12020162","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Jump rope is a widely applied basic training technique in various sports, yet it is understudied biomechanically. This study investigates the impact of cycle-tempo-induced motor control changes in elite jump rope athletes, addressing the biomechanical gap of cyclic skill control. The hypothesis posited two accelerations per jump cycle-one in front of and one behind the body-and anticipated that increased cycle frequency would alter the distribution of acceleration time within a cycle. Using 3D motion capture technology, 12 young elite jump rope athletes were analyzed at 100, 140, and 180 revolutions per minute (rpm). The kinematic parameters obtained confirmed the presence of two distinct accelerations per cycle. As tempo increased, the percentage of rear acceleration time increased from 9.58% at 100 rpm to 17.42% at 180 rpm, while front acceleration time decreased from 39.03% at 100 rpm to 31.40% at 180 rpm, along with peak velocities increasing from 12.94 m/s at 100 rpm to 22.74 m/s at 180 rpm significantly (p < 0.01). Rope trajectory analysis indicated a consistent movement pattern across tempos, primarily in the sagittal plane. Variations in skill control revealed shorter contact phases, decreasing from 61.53% at 100 rpm to 48.25% at 180 rpm, as well as a reduced vertical range of motion for the center of gravity (from 0.15 body height at 100 rpm to 0.06 body height at 180 rpm) and feet (from 0.05 body height at 100 rpm to 0.03 body height at 180 rpm) (p < 0.05). Significant reductions were also observed in the flexion/extension range of motion for the hip (from 22.31° at 100 rpm to 3.47° at 180 rpm), knee (from 49.31° at 100 rpm to 9.35° at 180 rpm), and ankle (from 52.99° at 100 rpm to 21.41° at 180 rpm) (p < 0.01). These findings enhance the understanding of motor control adaptations to different tempos and have practical implications for developing coaching programs aimed at optimizing performance, stability, and efficiency in jump rope training.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Bioengineering Chemical Engineering-Bioengineering

CiteScore

4.00

自引率

8.70%

发文量

661

期刊介绍： Aims Bioengineering (ISSN 2306-5354) provides an advanced forum for the science and technology of bioengineering. It publishes original research papers, comprehensive reviews, communications and case reports. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. All aspects of bioengineering are welcomed from theoretical concepts to education and applications. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. There are, in addition, four key features of this Journal: ● We are introducing a new concept in scientific and technical publications “The Translational Case Report in Bioengineering”. It is a descriptive explanatory analysis of a transformative or translational event. Understanding that the goal of bioengineering scholarship is to advance towards a transformative or clinical solution to an identified transformative/clinical need, the translational case report is used to explore causation in order to find underlying principles that may guide other similar transformative/translational undertakings. ● Manuscripts regarding research proposals and research ideas will be particularly welcomed. ● Electronic files and software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material. ● We also accept manuscripts communicating to a broader audience with regard to research projects financed with public funds. Scope ● Bionics and biological cybernetics: implantology; bio–abio interfaces ● Bioelectronics: wearable electronics; implantable electronics; “more than Moore” electronics; bioelectronics devices ● Bioprocess and biosystems engineering and applications: bioprocess design; biocatalysis; bioseparation and bioreactors; bioinformatics; bioenergy; etc. ● Biomolecular, cellular and tissue engineering and applications: tissue engineering; chromosome engineering; embryo engineering; cellular, molecular and synthetic biology; metabolic engineering; bio-nanotechnology; micro/nano technologies; genetic engineering; transgenic technology ● Biomedical engineering and applications: biomechatronics; biomedical electronics; biomechanics; biomaterials; biomimetics; biomedical diagnostics; biomedical therapy; biomedical devices; sensors and circuits; biomedical imaging and medical information systems; implants and regenerative medicine; neurotechnology; clinical engineering; rehabilitation engineering ● Biochemical engineering and applications: metabolic pathway engineering; modeling and simulation ● Translational bioengineering