Detection of COPD exacerbations with continuous monitoring of breathing rate and inspiratory amplitude under oxygen therapy.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Juliana Alves Pegoraro, Antoine Guerder, Thomas Similowski, Philippe Salamitou, Jesus Gonzalez-Bermejo, Etienne Birmelé
{"title":"Detection of COPD exacerbations with continuous monitoring of breathing rate and inspiratory amplitude under oxygen therapy.","authors":"Juliana Alves Pegoraro, Antoine Guerder, Thomas Similowski, Philippe Salamitou, Jesus Gonzalez-Bermejo, Etienne Birmelé","doi":"10.1186/s12911-025-02939-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is one of the main causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Its management represents real economic and public health burdens, accentuated by periods of acute disease deterioration, called exacerbations. Some researchers have studied the interest of monitoring patients' breathing rate as an indicator of exacerbation, although achieving limited sensitivity and/or specificity. In this study, we look to improve the previously described method, by combining breathing variables, using multiple daily measures, and using an artificial intelligence-based novelty detection approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with COPD were monitored with a telemedicine device during their stay in a rehabilitation care center. Daily measures are compared to individually trained reference models based on: i. oxygen therapy duration ii. mean breathing rate, iii. mean inspiratory amplitude, iv. mean breathing rate and mean inspiratory amplitude, v. average distribution of breathing rate and inspiratory amplitude, vi. hidden Markov model (HMM) from a time series of breathing rate and inspiratory amplitude.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A set of 16 recordings with exacerbation and 23 recordings without exacerbation was obtained. When using a daily measure of breathing rate, pre-exacerbation periods were identified with a specificity of 50% and a sensitivity of 55.6%. The method based on daily oxygen therapy usage and the method based on time series obtain a sensitivity of 76.8% and 73.2%, respectively, for a fixed specificity of 50%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A single daily measure of breathing rate alone is not sufficient for the detection of pre-exacerbation periods. More complete models also achieve limited performance, equivalent to models based on changes in the duration of therapy usage.</p>","PeriodicalId":9340,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","volume":"25 1","pages":"101"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11863910/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-025-02939-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is one of the main causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Its management represents real economic and public health burdens, accentuated by periods of acute disease deterioration, called exacerbations. Some researchers have studied the interest of monitoring patients' breathing rate as an indicator of exacerbation, although achieving limited sensitivity and/or specificity. In this study, we look to improve the previously described method, by combining breathing variables, using multiple daily measures, and using an artificial intelligence-based novelty detection approach.

Methods: Patients with COPD were monitored with a telemedicine device during their stay in a rehabilitation care center. Daily measures are compared to individually trained reference models based on: i. oxygen therapy duration ii. mean breathing rate, iii. mean inspiratory amplitude, iv. mean breathing rate and mean inspiratory amplitude, v. average distribution of breathing rate and inspiratory amplitude, vi. hidden Markov model (HMM) from a time series of breathing rate and inspiratory amplitude.

Results: A set of 16 recordings with exacerbation and 23 recordings without exacerbation was obtained. When using a daily measure of breathing rate, pre-exacerbation periods were identified with a specificity of 50% and a sensitivity of 55.6%. The method based on daily oxygen therapy usage and the method based on time series obtain a sensitivity of 76.8% and 73.2%, respectively, for a fixed specificity of 50%.

Conclusion: A single daily measure of breathing rate alone is not sufficient for the detection of pre-exacerbation periods. More complete models also achieve limited performance, equivalent to models based on changes in the duration of therapy usage.

连续监测氧疗下呼吸频率和吸气幅度对COPD加重的检测。
背景:慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)是世界范围内发病率和死亡率的主要原因之一。它的管理代表了真正的经济和公共卫生负担,并因疾病急性恶化时期(称为恶化期)而加重。一些研究人员对监测患者呼吸频率作为病情恶化指标的兴趣进行了研究,尽管灵敏度和/或特异性有限。在这项研究中,我们希望通过结合呼吸变量、使用多种日常测量和使用基于人工智能的新颖性检测方法来改进先前描述的方法。方法:COPD患者在康复护理中心住院期间使用远程医疗设备进行监测。将每日测量值与单独训练的参考模型进行比较:1 .氧治疗持续时间2。平均呼吸频率,iii。平均吸气幅度,iv.平均呼吸频率和平均吸气幅度,v.呼吸频率和吸气幅度的平均分布,vi.由呼吸频率和吸气幅度的时间序列得到的隐马尔可夫模型(HMM)。结果:共获得加重记录16条,无加重记录23条。当使用每日呼吸频率测量时,确定急性加重前期的特异性为50%,敏感性为55.6%。基于每日氧疗使用量的方法和基于时间序列的方法的敏感性分别为76.8%和73.2%,固定特异性为50%。结论:单次每日呼吸频率测量不足以检测急性加重前期。更完整的模型也只能达到有限的效果,相当于基于治疗持续时间变化的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the design, development, implementation, use, and evaluation of health information technologies and decision-making for human health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信