The association between red blood cell transfusion timing and the development of retinopathy of prematurity: Application of the two-phase theory.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Salma El Emrani, Lizanne A Derks, Angela M Tjiam, Michaela van Bohemen, Jacqueline U M Termote, Lotte E van der Meeren, Irwin K M Reiss, H Rob Taal, Enrico Lopriore, Nicoline E Schalij-Delfos
{"title":"The association between red blood cell transfusion timing and the development of retinopathy of prematurity: Application of the two-phase theory.","authors":"Salma El Emrani, Lizanne A Derks, Angela M Tjiam, Michaela van Bohemen, Jacqueline U M Termote, Lotte E van der Meeren, Irwin K M Reiss, H Rob Taal, Enrico Lopriore, Nicoline E Schalij-Delfos","doi":"10.1111/aos.17471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Red blood cell (RBC) transfusions are believed to be associated with retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), but the underlying mechanism is not fully understood, partly due to the lack of information on RBC transfusion timing. The aim was to determine the association between the timing and amount of RBC transfusions and the development and severity of ROP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective dual-center cohort study included 1177 neonates born in 2004-2022 with a gestational age at birth ≤28 weeks. Primary outcomes were any stage ROP and severe ROP based on maximum staging. Phase I of ROP was defined as ≤32.0 weeks postmenstrual age and phase II as >32.0 weeks postmenstrual age. Logistic regression analyses were adjusted for gestational age at birth, small for gestational age, mechanical ventilation duration, postnatal corticosteroids, sepsis, and necrotizing enterocolitis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multivariate analysis showed independent associations with severe ROP for RBC transfusion (OR 5.1; 95% CI 1.8-14.3), number of RBC transfusions (OR 1.2; 95% CI 1.1-1.3), RBC transfusion in phase I (OR 2.5; 95% CI 1.2-5.3), number of RBC transfusions in phase I (OR 1.2; 95% CI 1.0-1.3), RBC transfusion in phase II (OR 4.1; 95% CI 2.7-6.3) and number of RBC transfusions in phase II (OR 1.9; 95% CI 1.5-2.4).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on maximum ROP staging, RBC transfusions in phases I and II are both associated with a high risk of severe ROP. A randomized controlled trial is urgently needed to determine the potential effect of RBC transfusions in phase II on ROP progression.</p>","PeriodicalId":6915,"journal":{"name":"Acta Ophthalmologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Ophthalmologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.17471","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Red blood cell (RBC) transfusions are believed to be associated with retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), but the underlying mechanism is not fully understood, partly due to the lack of information on RBC transfusion timing. The aim was to determine the association between the timing and amount of RBC transfusions and the development and severity of ROP.

Methods: This retrospective dual-center cohort study included 1177 neonates born in 2004-2022 with a gestational age at birth ≤28 weeks. Primary outcomes were any stage ROP and severe ROP based on maximum staging. Phase I of ROP was defined as ≤32.0 weeks postmenstrual age and phase II as >32.0 weeks postmenstrual age. Logistic regression analyses were adjusted for gestational age at birth, small for gestational age, mechanical ventilation duration, postnatal corticosteroids, sepsis, and necrotizing enterocolitis.

Results: Multivariate analysis showed independent associations with severe ROP for RBC transfusion (OR 5.1; 95% CI 1.8-14.3), number of RBC transfusions (OR 1.2; 95% CI 1.1-1.3), RBC transfusion in phase I (OR 2.5; 95% CI 1.2-5.3), number of RBC transfusions in phase I (OR 1.2; 95% CI 1.0-1.3), RBC transfusion in phase II (OR 4.1; 95% CI 2.7-6.3) and number of RBC transfusions in phase II (OR 1.9; 95% CI 1.5-2.4).

Conclusion: Based on maximum ROP staging, RBC transfusions in phases I and II are both associated with a high risk of severe ROP. A randomized controlled trial is urgently needed to determine the potential effect of RBC transfusions in phase II on ROP progression.

红细胞输血时机与早产儿视网膜病变发展的关系:两期理论的应用。
目的:红细胞(RBC)输注被认为与早产儿视网膜病变(ROP)有关,但其潜在机制尚不完全清楚,部分原因是缺乏红细胞输注时机的信息。目的是确定红细胞输注的时间和数量与ROP的发展和严重程度之间的关系。方法:这项回顾性双中心队列研究纳入了2004-2022年出生、出生胎龄≤28周的1177例新生儿。主要结局是任何阶段ROP和基于最大分期的严重ROP。第一期ROP定义为≤32.0周经后年龄,第二期定义为≤32.0周经后年龄。对出生胎龄、小胎龄、机械通气时间、产后皮质激素、败血症和坏死性小肠结肠炎进行了Logistic回归分析。结果:多因素分析显示RBC输血与严重ROP的独立关联(OR 5.1;95% CI 1.8-14.3)、红细胞输注次数(OR 1.2;95% CI 1.1-1.3), I期输血(OR 2.5;95% CI 1.2-5.3), I期红细胞输注次数(OR 1.2;95% CI 1.0-1.3), II期输血(OR 4.1;95% CI 2.7-6.3)和II期红细胞输注次数(OR 1.9;95% ci 1.5-2.4)。结论:基于最大ROP分期,I期和II期红细胞输注均与严重ROP的高风险相关。迫切需要一项随机对照试验来确定II期红细胞输注对ROP进展的潜在影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Ophthalmologica
Acta Ophthalmologica 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
433
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Acta Ophthalmologica is published on behalf of the Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation and is the official scientific publication of the following societies: The Danish Ophthalmological Society, The Finnish Ophthalmological Society, The Icelandic Ophthalmological Society, The Norwegian Ophthalmological Society and The Swedish Ophthalmological Society, and also the European Association for Vision and Eye Research (EVER). Acta Ophthalmologica publishes clinical and experimental original articles, reviews, editorials, educational photo essays (Diagnosis and Therapy in Ophthalmology), case reports and case series, letters to the editor and doctoral theses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信