Phenotypic analysis of dinotefuran resistance in the brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (Hemiptera: Delphacidae), using the experimental evolution approach
{"title":"Phenotypic analysis of dinotefuran resistance in the brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (Hemiptera: Delphacidae), using the experimental evolution approach","authors":"Tomohisa Fujii, Masaya Matsumura, Sachiyo Sanada-Morimura","doi":"10.1111/aab.12957","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Insecticide applications for controlling insect pests drive the rapid phenotypic evolution of resistance traits within populations. In two decades, the brown planthopper, <i>Nilaparvata lugens</i>, has rapidly developed resistance to imidacloprid, a neonicotinoid insecticide, but its resistance to dinotefuran has not developed as quickly. We assume that the genetic mechanism underlying the resistance evolution of <i>N. lugens</i> differs between the imidacloprid- and dinotefuran-resistant phenotypes. Dinotefuran-resistant strains, collected from a paddy field in Kumamoto in 2013 (Res-D13) and 2014 (Res-D14), were subjected to quantitative genetic analysis. The realized heritabilities of dinotefuran resistance were 0.091 (Res-D13) and 0.084 (Res-D14) after the 15th generation of selection. Reciprocal cross experiments between Res-D13 and the susceptible strain (Sus-strain), and between Res-D14 and the Sus-strain, showed that the degree of dominance for dinotefuran resistance ranged from 0.34 to 0.57. Analysis of the F<sub>2</sub> population and backcrosses to the parental strains indicated that dinotefuran resistance is a quantitative trait controlled by multiple genes on autosomal chromosomes. We propose that the realized heritability and the mode of inheritance of dinotefuran resistance well explain the slow development of dinotefuran resistance in field <i>N. lugens</i> populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":7977,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Applied Biology","volume":"186 2","pages":"195-203"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Applied Biology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aab.12957","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Insecticide applications for controlling insect pests drive the rapid phenotypic evolution of resistance traits within populations. In two decades, the brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens, has rapidly developed resistance to imidacloprid, a neonicotinoid insecticide, but its resistance to dinotefuran has not developed as quickly. We assume that the genetic mechanism underlying the resistance evolution of N. lugens differs between the imidacloprid- and dinotefuran-resistant phenotypes. Dinotefuran-resistant strains, collected from a paddy field in Kumamoto in 2013 (Res-D13) and 2014 (Res-D14), were subjected to quantitative genetic analysis. The realized heritabilities of dinotefuran resistance were 0.091 (Res-D13) and 0.084 (Res-D14) after the 15th generation of selection. Reciprocal cross experiments between Res-D13 and the susceptible strain (Sus-strain), and between Res-D14 and the Sus-strain, showed that the degree of dominance for dinotefuran resistance ranged from 0.34 to 0.57. Analysis of the F2 population and backcrosses to the parental strains indicated that dinotefuran resistance is a quantitative trait controlled by multiple genes on autosomal chromosomes. We propose that the realized heritability and the mode of inheritance of dinotefuran resistance well explain the slow development of dinotefuran resistance in field N. lugens populations.
期刊介绍:
Annals of Applied Biology is an international journal sponsored by the Association of Applied Biologists. The journal publishes original research papers on all aspects of applied research on crop production, crop protection and the cropping ecosystem. The journal is published both online and in six printed issues per year.
Annals papers must contribute substantially to the advancement of knowledge and may, among others, encompass the scientific disciplines of:
Agronomy
Agrometeorology
Agrienvironmental sciences
Applied genomics
Applied metabolomics
Applied proteomics
Biodiversity
Biological control
Climate change
Crop ecology
Entomology
Genetic manipulation
Molecular biology
Mycology
Nematology
Pests
Plant pathology
Plant breeding & genetics
Plant physiology
Post harvest biology
Soil science
Statistics
Virology
Weed biology
Annals also welcomes reviews of interest in these subject areas. Reviews should be critical surveys of the field and offer new insights. All papers are subject to peer review. Papers must usually contribute substantially to the advancement of knowledge in applied biology but short papers discussing techniques or substantiated results, and reviews of current knowledge of interest to applied biologists will be considered for publication. Papers or reviews must not be offered to any other journal for prior or simultaneous publication and normally average seven printed pages.