Xiaoliang Shi, Xi Chen, Hao Ding, Dan Zhang, Xinshuang Wang
{"title":"Ecosystem Services Tradeoffs and Synergies Across Drought Gradients in the Middle Reaches of the Yellow River Basin: A Time Scale Perspective","authors":"Xiaoliang Shi, Xi Chen, Hao Ding, Dan Zhang, Xinshuang Wang","doi":"10.1002/eco.70006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>In the context of global climate change, understanding the tradeoffs and synergies between ecosystem services (ESs) is essential for regional ecological management and sustainable development. This study simulated net primary productivity (NPP) and quick flow (QF) in the Middle Reaches of the Yellow River Basin (MRYRB) in 2000 and 2020, utilizing the Carnegie–Ames–Stanford Approach (CASA) and Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs (InVEST) models to assess ESs related to carbon sequestration (CS) and water yield (WY). The synergistic multi-temporal scale changes in ESs tradeoffs under different drought conditions were assessed by delineating regions with different drought frequencies. The results showed that (1) the mean NPP in the MRYRB increased from 189.03 g C/m<sup>2</sup> in 2000 to 335.94 g C/m<sup>2</sup> in 2020, reflecting a 77.71% rise, while the mean annual QF escalated from 41.20 mm in 2000 to 59.59 mm in 2020, marking an increase of 44.64%; (2) on a monthly scale, the tradeoff and synergy relationships exhibited distinct seasonal variations, with tradeoffs prevailing throughout the year and a shift from tradeoff to synergy in CS and WY during the summer and fall. On an annual scale, synergy was the dominant relationship; (3) the intensity of tradeoffs and synergies varied by drought gradients, with the highest intensity observed in high-frequency drought areas at the monthly scale, whereas, on an annual scale, low-frequency drought areas exhibited the strongest tradeoffs and synergies. This study provides an in-depth analysis of the interactions between ESs under varying drought conditions across different time scales. The findings highlight the distinct differences in tradeoffs and synergies of ESs, offering valuable scientific insights for the coordinated management of regional ecosystems.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55169,"journal":{"name":"Ecohydrology","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecohydrology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eco.70006","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In the context of global climate change, understanding the tradeoffs and synergies between ecosystem services (ESs) is essential for regional ecological management and sustainable development. This study simulated net primary productivity (NPP) and quick flow (QF) in the Middle Reaches of the Yellow River Basin (MRYRB) in 2000 and 2020, utilizing the Carnegie–Ames–Stanford Approach (CASA) and Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs (InVEST) models to assess ESs related to carbon sequestration (CS) and water yield (WY). The synergistic multi-temporal scale changes in ESs tradeoffs under different drought conditions were assessed by delineating regions with different drought frequencies. The results showed that (1) the mean NPP in the MRYRB increased from 189.03 g C/m2 in 2000 to 335.94 g C/m2 in 2020, reflecting a 77.71% rise, while the mean annual QF escalated from 41.20 mm in 2000 to 59.59 mm in 2020, marking an increase of 44.64%; (2) on a monthly scale, the tradeoff and synergy relationships exhibited distinct seasonal variations, with tradeoffs prevailing throughout the year and a shift from tradeoff to synergy in CS and WY during the summer and fall. On an annual scale, synergy was the dominant relationship; (3) the intensity of tradeoffs and synergies varied by drought gradients, with the highest intensity observed in high-frequency drought areas at the monthly scale, whereas, on an annual scale, low-frequency drought areas exhibited the strongest tradeoffs and synergies. This study provides an in-depth analysis of the interactions between ESs under varying drought conditions across different time scales. The findings highlight the distinct differences in tradeoffs and synergies of ESs, offering valuable scientific insights for the coordinated management of regional ecosystems.
期刊介绍:
Ecohydrology is an international journal publishing original scientific and review papers that aim to improve understanding of processes at the interface between ecology and hydrology and associated applications related to environmental management.
Ecohydrology seeks to increase interdisciplinary insights by placing particular emphasis on interactions and associated feedbacks in both space and time between ecological systems and the hydrological cycle. Research contributions are solicited from disciplines focusing on the physical, ecological, biological, biogeochemical, geomorphological, drainage basin, mathematical and methodological aspects of ecohydrology. Research in both terrestrial and aquatic systems is of interest provided it explicitly links ecological systems and the hydrologic cycle; research such as aquatic ecological, channel engineering, or ecological or hydrological modelling is less appropriate for the journal unless it specifically addresses the criteria above. Manuscripts describing individual case studies are of interest in cases where broader insights are discussed beyond site- and species-specific results.