Managing climate change impacts on crops: The influence of soil tillage on a triticale crop under water stress conditions

IF 2.2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Paula Madejón, Elena Fernández-Boy, Engracia Madejón, Laura Morales-Salmerón, María Teresa Domínguez
{"title":"Managing climate change impacts on crops: The influence of soil tillage on a triticale crop under water stress conditions","authors":"Paula Madejón,&nbsp;Elena Fernández-Boy,&nbsp;Engracia Madejón,&nbsp;Laura Morales-Salmerón,&nbsp;María Teresa Domínguez","doi":"10.1111/aab.12947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Water limitations for agriculture will likely become crucial in the next decades in some regions such as the Mediterranean basin with the current climate change projections. In this context, recent evidence suggests that the application of conservation agriculture, which reduces the frequency and intensity of soil tillage, could confer a higher stability of agricultural systems against climate variability. However, not many experiments have addressed the interaction between tillage type and the resistance to drought in rainfed crops. In this work, we evaluated the resistance to drought of triticale (<i>Triticale hexaploide</i> L.) crops managed with different tillage systems: traditional tillage (TT), reduced tillage (RT) and no tillage (NT). A rainfall exclusion experiment was carried out in a typical wheat/legume Mediterranean rotation in SW Spain, in a long-term experiment established in 2008 comparing the three tillage systems. Grain yield and different variables related to plant ecophysiology, root development, biomass allocation and colonisation by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) were evaluated over one crop cycle. Tillage type had a significant influence on soil water storage (SWS), such that soils under NT had, on average, a 16% greater SWS than soils under RT or TT. Grain yield was significantly reduced by rainfall exclusion, in particular in the TT, where drought reduced grain yield by 31%. Gas exchange data also showed that plants in the TT system were more sensitive to drought, such that maximum photosynthesis rates were reduced by 25% because of rainfall exclusion in this tillage system. Drought had a negative impact on root biomass across the three tillage systems, especially in the RT, where a reduction in the root:shoot ratio was observed. The effect of tillage on mycorrhizal colonisation was more evident than the effect of drought; in general, conservation tillage systems (RT and NT) tended to have higher values for all AMF traits compared to the TT. In summary, the NT system tended to exhibit more favourable performance in terms of soil water retention, grain yield stability under drought conditions and mycorrhizal symbiosis, which suggests enhanced resource use efficiency in this system.</p>","PeriodicalId":7977,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Applied Biology","volume":"186 2","pages":"143-156"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aab.12947","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Applied Biology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aab.12947","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Water limitations for agriculture will likely become crucial in the next decades in some regions such as the Mediterranean basin with the current climate change projections. In this context, recent evidence suggests that the application of conservation agriculture, which reduces the frequency and intensity of soil tillage, could confer a higher stability of agricultural systems against climate variability. However, not many experiments have addressed the interaction between tillage type and the resistance to drought in rainfed crops. In this work, we evaluated the resistance to drought of triticale (Triticale hexaploide L.) crops managed with different tillage systems: traditional tillage (TT), reduced tillage (RT) and no tillage (NT). A rainfall exclusion experiment was carried out in a typical wheat/legume Mediterranean rotation in SW Spain, in a long-term experiment established in 2008 comparing the three tillage systems. Grain yield and different variables related to plant ecophysiology, root development, biomass allocation and colonisation by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) were evaluated over one crop cycle. Tillage type had a significant influence on soil water storage (SWS), such that soils under NT had, on average, a 16% greater SWS than soils under RT or TT. Grain yield was significantly reduced by rainfall exclusion, in particular in the TT, where drought reduced grain yield by 31%. Gas exchange data also showed that plants in the TT system were more sensitive to drought, such that maximum photosynthesis rates were reduced by 25% because of rainfall exclusion in this tillage system. Drought had a negative impact on root biomass across the three tillage systems, especially in the RT, where a reduction in the root:shoot ratio was observed. The effect of tillage on mycorrhizal colonisation was more evident than the effect of drought; in general, conservation tillage systems (RT and NT) tended to have higher values for all AMF traits compared to the TT. In summary, the NT system tended to exhibit more favourable performance in terms of soil water retention, grain yield stability under drought conditions and mycorrhizal symbiosis, which suggests enhanced resource use efficiency in this system.

Abstract Image

根据目前的气候变化预测,在地中海盆地等一些地区,农业用水的限制在未来几十年可能会变得至关重要。在这种情况下,最近的证据表明,应用保护性农业(减少土壤耕作的频率和强度)可以提高农业系统的稳定性,抵御气候变异。然而,针对耕作类型与雨浇作物抗旱性之间相互作用的实验并不多。在这项工作中,我们评估了采用传统耕作(TT)、减少耕作(RT)和免耕(NT)等不同耕作制度管理的三棱草(Triticale hexaploide L.)作物的抗旱性。在西班牙西南部一个典型的小麦/豆类地中海轮作区进行了一项排除降雨实验,该实验于 2008 年建立,是一项比较三种耕作制度的长期实验。在一个作物周期内,对谷物产量以及与植物生态生理学、根系发育、生物量分配和丛枝菌根真菌(AMF)定殖有关的不同变量进行了评估。耕作类型对土壤储水量(SWS)有显著影响,例如,NT 土壤的 SWS 平均比 RT 或 TT 土壤高出 16%。降雨排斥会明显降低谷物产量,特别是在 TT 中,干旱会使谷物产量减少 31%。气体交换数据还表明,TT 系统中的植物对干旱更为敏感,因此,在这种耕作系统中,由于降雨排斥,最大光合作用率降低了 25%。干旱对三种耕作制度的根系生物量都有负面影响,尤其是在 RT 制度中,根:芽比有所下降。耕作对菌根定殖的影响比干旱的影响更明显;一般来说,保护性耕作系统(RT 和 NT)的所有 AMF 特性值往往高于 TT。总之,NT 系统在土壤保水性、干旱条件下的谷物产量稳定性和菌根共生方面表现更佳,这表明该系统的资源利用效率更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Applied Biology
Annals of Applied Biology 生物-农业综合
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Applied Biology is an international journal sponsored by the Association of Applied Biologists. The journal publishes original research papers on all aspects of applied research on crop production, crop protection and the cropping ecosystem. The journal is published both online and in six printed issues per year. Annals papers must contribute substantially to the advancement of knowledge and may, among others, encompass the scientific disciplines of: Agronomy Agrometeorology Agrienvironmental sciences Applied genomics Applied metabolomics Applied proteomics Biodiversity Biological control Climate change Crop ecology Entomology Genetic manipulation Molecular biology Mycology Nematology Pests Plant pathology Plant breeding & genetics Plant physiology Post harvest biology Soil science Statistics Virology Weed biology Annals also welcomes reviews of interest in these subject areas. Reviews should be critical surveys of the field and offer new insights. All papers are subject to peer review. Papers must usually contribute substantially to the advancement of knowledge in applied biology but short papers discussing techniques or substantiated results, and reviews of current knowledge of interest to applied biologists will be considered for publication. Papers or reviews must not be offered to any other journal for prior or simultaneous publication and normally average seven printed pages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信