Injected Tracer Reveals Differences in Water Transport Rate, Residence Times and Mixing Dynamics in Tree Species of Contrasting Water Management Strategies

IF 3.2 3区 地球科学 Q1 Environmental Science
Mikaela Maneely, Keith Reinhardt, Ryan E. Emanuel, Kevan J. Minick, Jennifer Bahramian, Lauren M. Tucker, Daniel M. Johnson
{"title":"Injected Tracer Reveals Differences in Water Transport Rate, Residence Times and Mixing Dynamics in Tree Species of Contrasting Water Management Strategies","authors":"Mikaela Maneely,&nbsp;Keith Reinhardt,&nbsp;Ryan E. Emanuel,&nbsp;Kevan J. Minick,&nbsp;Jennifer Bahramian,&nbsp;Lauren M. Tucker,&nbsp;Daniel M. Johnson","doi":"10.1002/hyp.70091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Studies have shown that water can reside inside trees for up to several months, but how the duration of long-term stored water relates to species-specific water management strategies is not known. We studied water residence time, tracer velocity, and internal mixing in two tree species with differing water management strategies by injecting deuterated water into Douglas fir (<i>Pseudotsuga menziesii</i>) and trembling aspen (<i>Populus tremuloides</i>) trees and then monitoring tracer concentration daily in leaves for several weeks postinjection. In a companion study, we injected tracer and collected leaves at subdaily timescales to explore subdaily patterns of tracer arrival in canopy leaves. For the first experiment, we hypothesised that the tracer would remain in both species for days to weeks and that the tracer would have a longer residence time in the more isohydric Douglas fir trees. For the subdaily study, we explored if the tracer would arrive at a sharp peak, or be more spread out over time. The tracer resided in the trees 7–11 days for both species. Interestingly, the tracer reached the canopy leaves of aspen sooner yet remained in trees for longer compared to Douglas fir, which exhibited sharp pulses of tracer breakthrough in canopies. Surprisingly, the tracer arrival in aspens occurred in two distinct pulses, separated by 1–2 days. Combined, the results from both experiments suggest that water inside trees may not flow in simple ‘in-up-and-out’ (i.e., piston flow) ways and that complex mixing of water reservoirs and water flow paths may occur in some tree species.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13189,"journal":{"name":"Hydrological Processes","volume":"39 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hydrological Processes","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hyp.70091","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Studies have shown that water can reside inside trees for up to several months, but how the duration of long-term stored water relates to species-specific water management strategies is not known. We studied water residence time, tracer velocity, and internal mixing in two tree species with differing water management strategies by injecting deuterated water into Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) and trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides) trees and then monitoring tracer concentration daily in leaves for several weeks postinjection. In a companion study, we injected tracer and collected leaves at subdaily timescales to explore subdaily patterns of tracer arrival in canopy leaves. For the first experiment, we hypothesised that the tracer would remain in both species for days to weeks and that the tracer would have a longer residence time in the more isohydric Douglas fir trees. For the subdaily study, we explored if the tracer would arrive at a sharp peak, or be more spread out over time. The tracer resided in the trees 7–11 days for both species. Interestingly, the tracer reached the canopy leaves of aspen sooner yet remained in trees for longer compared to Douglas fir, which exhibited sharp pulses of tracer breakthrough in canopies. Surprisingly, the tracer arrival in aspens occurred in two distinct pulses, separated by 1–2 days. Combined, the results from both experiments suggest that water inside trees may not flow in simple ‘in-up-and-out’ (i.e., piston flow) ways and that complex mixing of water reservoirs and water flow paths may occur in some tree species.

Abstract Image

注入示踪剂揭示了不同水分管理策略树种中水分输送速率、停留时间和混合动力学的差异
研究表明,水可以在树木中停留长达几个月,但长期储存水的持续时间与物种特定的水管理策略之间的关系尚不清楚。通过向花旗松(pseudosuga menziesii)和白杨(Populus tremuloides)注入淡水,研究了两种不同水分管理策略树种的水分停留时间、示踪剂速度和内部混合情况,并在注射后数周内每天监测叶片中示踪剂的浓度。在一项伴随研究中,我们注射示踪剂并在亚日时间尺度上收集叶片,以探索示踪剂到达冠层叶片的亚日模式。在第一个实验中,我们假设示踪剂将在两种树种中停留数天至数周,而示踪剂在等水性更强的花旗松树种中停留时间更长。对于亚日常研究,我们探索示踪剂是否会达到一个尖锐的峰值,或者随着时间的推移更分散。示踪剂在两种树种的停留时间均为7 ~ 11天。有趣的是,与花旗松相比,示踪剂到达白杨树冠的时间更早,但在树木中停留的时间更长,花旗松在树冠上表现出明显的示踪剂突破脉冲。令人惊讶的是,示踪剂到达白杨树发生在两个不同的脉冲中,间隔1-2天。综合来看,这两个实验的结果表明,树木内部的水可能不会以简单的“进-上-出”(即活塞流)的方式流动,在某些树种中可能会出现水库和水流路径的复杂混合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hydrological Processes
Hydrological Processes 环境科学-水资源
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
313
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Hydrological Processes is an international journal that publishes original scientific papers advancing understanding of the mechanisms underlying the movement and storage of water in the environment, and the interaction of water with geological, biogeochemical, atmospheric and ecological systems. Not all papers related to water resources are appropriate for submission to this journal; rather we seek papers that clearly articulate the role(s) of hydrological processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信