Top pedestrian concerns in Canada mapped on WalkRollMap.org

IF 1.4 4区 社会学 Q2 GEOGRAPHY
Colin Ferster, Karen Laberee, Trisalyn Nelson, Meghan Winters, Marie-Soleil Cloutier, Daniel Fuller
{"title":"Top pedestrian concerns in Canada mapped on WalkRollMap.org","authors":"Colin Ferster,&nbsp;Karen Laberee,&nbsp;Trisalyn Nelson,&nbsp;Meghan Winters,&nbsp;Marie-Soleil Cloutier,&nbsp;Daniel Fuller","doi":"10.1111/cag.70005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Walking is a healthy, sustainable, and economical form of transportation or recreation. Yet in North America walking is not always accessible, safe, or comfortable. A challenge to creating quality pedestrian environments is lack of data on what barriers exist and how barriers vary across communities. Our goal is to characterize pedestrian barriers and concerns at the microscale level. We analyzed 2,588 reports of hazards, missing amenities, or incidents from WalkRollMap.org, a crowdsourced webmap of barriers to walking or rolling. We assigned themes related to actionable infrastructure interventions and summarized data by location, walkability, street type, and characteristics of who reported it (age, gender, and self-reported disability). Most reports were related to crossings (45%), sidewalk quality (29%), and the volume and speed of cars (13%). Reports were more common in more walkable places (likely related to exposure) and on major roads. People living with a disability reported sidewalk concerns at a higher rate than others, while people over 75 years of age were more likely to identify issues related to the volume and speed of cars. Cities should prioritize risk reduction interventions for pedestrian road crossings and sidewalk improvements, especially on major roads in amenity dense walkable places.</p>","PeriodicalId":47619,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Geographer-Geographe Canadien","volume":"69 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cag.70005","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Geographer-Geographe Canadien","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cag.70005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Walking is a healthy, sustainable, and economical form of transportation or recreation. Yet in North America walking is not always accessible, safe, or comfortable. A challenge to creating quality pedestrian environments is lack of data on what barriers exist and how barriers vary across communities. Our goal is to characterize pedestrian barriers and concerns at the microscale level. We analyzed 2,588 reports of hazards, missing amenities, or incidents from WalkRollMap.org, a crowdsourced webmap of barriers to walking or rolling. We assigned themes related to actionable infrastructure interventions and summarized data by location, walkability, street type, and characteristics of who reported it (age, gender, and self-reported disability). Most reports were related to crossings (45%), sidewalk quality (29%), and the volume and speed of cars (13%). Reports were more common in more walkable places (likely related to exposure) and on major roads. People living with a disability reported sidewalk concerns at a higher rate than others, while people over 75 years of age were more likely to identify issues related to the volume and speed of cars. Cities should prioritize risk reduction interventions for pedestrian road crossings and sidewalk improvements, especially on major roads in amenity dense walkable places.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
76
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信