Primary Sludges Drive the Scalability and Power Production of Hydrothermal Liquefaction for Energy Resource Recovery at Wastewater Treatment Facilities

Carl Abadam*, Alejandro Espino, Katelin Fisher, Derek Belka, Rui Liu and Anjali Mulchandani, 
{"title":"Primary Sludges Drive the Scalability and Power Production of Hydrothermal Liquefaction for Energy Resource Recovery at Wastewater Treatment Facilities","authors":"Carl Abadam*,&nbsp;Alejandro Espino,&nbsp;Katelin Fisher,&nbsp;Derek Belka,&nbsp;Rui Liu and Anjali Mulchandani,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acssusresmgt.4c0036810.1021/acssusresmgt.4c00368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >This research assesses the impact of wastewater sludges from different treatment stages and facility scales on the biocrude power potential from hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL). HTL offers a promising method for energy resource recovery through biocrude production, yet its viability for smaller facilities [&lt;1 million gallons per day (MGD)] remains uncertain. Sludges from facilities of varying scales (0.8, 13, and 76 MGD) were analyzed. We found that the treatment stage influences the energy content and chemical composition more than the facility scale. HTL experiments showed that primary sludges (PS) yield more biocrude than waste-activated sludges (WAS); however, the carbon fractionation remained similar across facility scales. The power generated by PS converted to biocrude was 1.05–1.55 times higher than that if it were converted to methane. Meanwhile, WAS resulted in lower power generation from biocrude than methane. At small plants where primary treatment is not incorporated, HTL is not an ideal energy recovery technology, and instead other waste-management solutions might be better explored. This study emphasizes applying HTL only at plants where it can be truly viable for matching or exceeding the power consumption by evaluating HTL in the context of practical wastewater treatment parameters, e.g., treatment flow, sludge density, energy density, and the realistic conversion potential for energy resource recovery technologies.</p><p >This study highlights the importance of the sludge quantity and quality in determining the scalability of sustainable energy resource recovery for wastewater treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":100015,"journal":{"name":"ACS Sustainable Resource Management","volume":"2 2","pages":"275–283 275–283"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acssusresmgt.4c00368","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Sustainable Resource Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acssusresmgt.4c00368","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research assesses the impact of wastewater sludges from different treatment stages and facility scales on the biocrude power potential from hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL). HTL offers a promising method for energy resource recovery through biocrude production, yet its viability for smaller facilities [<1 million gallons per day (MGD)] remains uncertain. Sludges from facilities of varying scales (0.8, 13, and 76 MGD) were analyzed. We found that the treatment stage influences the energy content and chemical composition more than the facility scale. HTL experiments showed that primary sludges (PS) yield more biocrude than waste-activated sludges (WAS); however, the carbon fractionation remained similar across facility scales. The power generated by PS converted to biocrude was 1.05–1.55 times higher than that if it were converted to methane. Meanwhile, WAS resulted in lower power generation from biocrude than methane. At small plants where primary treatment is not incorporated, HTL is not an ideal energy recovery technology, and instead other waste-management solutions might be better explored. This study emphasizes applying HTL only at plants where it can be truly viable for matching or exceeding the power consumption by evaluating HTL in the context of practical wastewater treatment parameters, e.g., treatment flow, sludge density, energy density, and the realistic conversion potential for energy resource recovery technologies.

This study highlights the importance of the sludge quantity and quality in determining the scalability of sustainable energy resource recovery for wastewater treatment.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信