Incomplete mass closure in atmospheric nanoparticle growth

IF 8.5 1区 地球科学 Q1 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Dominik Stolzenburg, Nina Sarnela, Federico Bianchi, Jing Cai, Runlong Cai, Yafang Cheng, Lubna Dada, Neil M. Donahue, Hinrich Grothe, Sebastian Holm, Veli-Matti Kerminen, Katrianne Lehtipalo, Tuukka Petäjä, Juha Sulo, Paul M. Winkler, Chao Yan, Juha Kangasluoma, Markku Kulmala
{"title":"Incomplete mass closure in atmospheric nanoparticle growth","authors":"Dominik Stolzenburg, Nina Sarnela, Federico Bianchi, Jing Cai, Runlong Cai, Yafang Cheng, Lubna Dada, Neil M. Donahue, Hinrich Grothe, Sebastian Holm, Veli-Matti Kerminen, Katrianne Lehtipalo, Tuukka Petäjä, Juha Sulo, Paul M. Winkler, Chao Yan, Juha Kangasluoma, Markku Kulmala","doi":"10.1038/s41612-025-00893-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Nucleation and subsequent growth of new aerosol particles in the atmosphere is a major source of cloud condensation nuclei and persistent large uncertainty in climate models. Newly formed particles need to grow rapidly to avoid scavenging by pre-existing aerosols and become relevant for the climate and air quality. In the continental atmosphere, condensation of oxygenated organic molecules is often the dominant mechanism for rapid growth. However, the huge variety of different organics present in the continental boundary layer makes it challenging to predict nanoparticle growth rates from gas-phase measurements. Moreover, recent studies have shown that growth rates of nanoparticles derived from particle size distribution measurements show surprisingly little dependency on potentially condensable vapors observed in the gas phase. Here, we show that the observed nanoparticle growth rates in the sub-10 nm size range can be predicted in the boreal forest only for springtime conditions, even with state-of-the-art mass spectrometers and particle sizing instruments. We find that, especially under warmer conditions, observed growth is slower than predicted from gas-phase condensation. We show that only a combination of simple particle-phase reaction schemes, phase separation due to non-ideal solution behavior, or particle-phase diffusion limitations can explain the observed lower growth rates. Our analysis provides first insights as to why atmospheric nanoparticle growth rates above 10 nm h<sup>−1</sup> are rarely observed. Ultimately, a reduction of experimental uncertainties and improved sub-10 nm particle hygroscopicity and chemical composition measurements are needed to further investigate the occurrence of such a growth rate-limiting process.</p>","PeriodicalId":19438,"journal":{"name":"npj Climate and Atmospheric Science","volume":"185 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"npj Climate and Atmospheric Science","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-025-00893-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nucleation and subsequent growth of new aerosol particles in the atmosphere is a major source of cloud condensation nuclei and persistent large uncertainty in climate models. Newly formed particles need to grow rapidly to avoid scavenging by pre-existing aerosols and become relevant for the climate and air quality. In the continental atmosphere, condensation of oxygenated organic molecules is often the dominant mechanism for rapid growth. However, the huge variety of different organics present in the continental boundary layer makes it challenging to predict nanoparticle growth rates from gas-phase measurements. Moreover, recent studies have shown that growth rates of nanoparticles derived from particle size distribution measurements show surprisingly little dependency on potentially condensable vapors observed in the gas phase. Here, we show that the observed nanoparticle growth rates in the sub-10 nm size range can be predicted in the boreal forest only for springtime conditions, even with state-of-the-art mass spectrometers and particle sizing instruments. We find that, especially under warmer conditions, observed growth is slower than predicted from gas-phase condensation. We show that only a combination of simple particle-phase reaction schemes, phase separation due to non-ideal solution behavior, or particle-phase diffusion limitations can explain the observed lower growth rates. Our analysis provides first insights as to why atmospheric nanoparticle growth rates above 10 nm h−1 are rarely observed. Ultimately, a reduction of experimental uncertainties and improved sub-10 nm particle hygroscopicity and chemical composition measurements are needed to further investigate the occurrence of such a growth rate-limiting process.

Abstract Image

大气纳米颗粒生长中的不完全质量闭合
大气中新的气溶胶粒子的成核和随后的增长是云凝结核和气候模式持续的大不确定性的主要来源。新形成的颗粒需要迅速生长,以避免被先前存在的气溶胶清除,并与气候和空气质量相关。在大陆大气中,含氧有机分子的凝结往往是快速生长的主要机制。然而,大陆边界层中存在着种类繁多的有机物,这使得通过气相测量来预测纳米颗粒的生长速度具有挑战性。此外,最近的研究表明,由粒径分布测量得出的纳米颗粒的生长速率与气相中观察到的潜在可冷凝蒸汽的依赖关系小得令人惊讶。在这里,我们表明,即使使用最先进的质谱仪和粒度测定仪器,也只能在春季条件下预测北方森林中观察到的10纳米以下尺寸范围内的纳米颗粒生长速率。我们发现,特别是在较温暖的条件下,观测到的生长比由气相冷凝预测的要慢。我们表明,只有简单的颗粒相反应方案、由于非理想溶液行为导致的相分离或颗粒相扩散限制的组合才能解释观察到的较低的生长速率。我们的分析首次揭示了为什么大气中纳米颗粒的生长速率很少高于10 nm h - 1。最终,需要降低实验不确定度,改进10 nm以下颗粒的吸湿性和化学成分测量,以进一步研究这种生长速率限制过程的发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
npj Climate and Atmospheric Science
npj Climate and Atmospheric Science Earth and Planetary Sciences-Atmospheric Science
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
3.30%
发文量
87
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: npj Climate and Atmospheric Science is an open-access journal encompassing the relevant physical, chemical, and biological aspects of atmospheric and climate science. The journal places particular emphasis on regional studies that unveil new insights into specific localities, including examinations of local atmospheric composition, such as aerosols. The range of topics covered by the journal includes climate dynamics, climate variability, weather and climate prediction, climate change, ocean dynamics, weather extremes, air pollution, atmospheric chemistry (including aerosols), the hydrological cycle, and atmosphere–ocean and atmosphere–land interactions. The journal welcomes studies employing a diverse array of methods, including numerical and statistical modeling, the development and application of in situ observational techniques, remote sensing, and the development or evaluation of new reanalyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信